Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:31:21.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monopoly and Market Irregularities in Medieval Economic Thought: Traditions and Texts to A.D. 1500

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Odd Langholm
Odd Langholm
Affiliation:
Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a study of pre-classical monopoly theory published in 1951, Raymond de Roo ver started by briefly examining the doctrines held by the medieval scholastics. His analysis met with favorable response and was confirmed and further developed by later historians. The most satisfactory statement may still be that of Barry Gordon in his monograph on early economics. The consensus of these scholars can be summarized as follows. Medieval authors looked askance at the attempts by the guilds to establish minimum prices. They recognized the expediency of government grants of monopoly and regulation of prices of certain commodities. They strongly condemned private monopolies established for personal gain, as well as collusion among sellers for that purpose, price discrimination, engrossing, forestalling, regrating, and other forms of speculation. The just price was the current, competitive market price, free of all irregularities of these kinds and free of fraud and duress. Gordon adds that the schoolmen also sometimes referred to labor and cost factors, rather than the market, as estimates of the just price. These estimates were not necessarily contradictive but mutually supportive. They applied when the market was not working smoothly and when there was no market in operation at the time and place of the sale. When an exchange is concluded in a competitive market under normal circumstances, the going price can hardly be said to be unjust. It may sometimes seem uncharitable. There will always be some who cannot afford to pay the competitive price. Poor relief in medieval society, however, was mainly a matter of almsgiving. Unlike commutative justice, charity is not a workable ethical norm in the marketplace.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 395 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Manuscript primary sources

Alanus Anglicus. Apparatus in Compilationem primam. Bamberg SB Can.19.Google Scholar
Durand of Champagne, Summa collectionum pro confessionibus audiendis. Paris BN lat.3264.Google Scholar
Guido of Vergnano, Super Politicam. Venice BMarc. lat. VI.94.Google Scholar
Huguccio, Summa decretorum. Paris BN lat.3892.Google Scholar
John of Faenza, Summa super Decretum. Bamberg SB Can.37.Google Scholar
John of God, Liber poenitentiarius. Cambridge UL Kk.4.20.Google Scholar
Laurence of Spain, Glossa Palatina. B Vat Pal. lat.658.Google Scholar
Matthew of Cracow, De contractibus. Vienna NB CVP 4691.Google Scholar
Monaldus of Capodistria, Summa casuum conscientiae. Florence BLaur S.Croce Plut VIII, sin 3.Google Scholar
Peter, Quesnel, Directorium iuris in foro conscientiae et iudiciali. Florence BLaur S.Croce Plut III, sin 2.Google Scholar
Sicard of Cremona, Summa super Decretum. Bamberg SB Can.38.Google Scholar
Summa Bambergensis super Decretum. Bamberg SB Can.42.Google Scholar
Summa Monacensis super Decretum. Munich SB Clm 16084.Google Scholar
Ulrich of Strasbourg, De summo bono. Erlangen UB Lat.530/1–2.Google Scholar
Walter, Burley, Expositio super libros Politicorum. Paris BMaz 3496.Google Scholar
William of Cayeux, Summa. Bruxelles BR 2486.Google Scholar
William, Doune, Memoriale presbiterorum. Cambridge Corpus Cristi 148.Google Scholar
William of Rennes, Glossa in Summa Raimundi. Florence BNaz Conv. Soppr. G.VII.927.Google Scholar

Printed primary sources

Albert the Great, Politica, in Opera Omnia (Borgnet edition), Vol. 8.Google Scholar
Albert the Great, Super IV Sententiarum. Vols. 29–30.Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales, Summa theologica. 4 vols in 5. Quaracchi 1924–48.Google Scholar
Ambrose of Milan, De officiis ministrorum. PL 16.Google Scholar
Antonino of Florence, Summa theologica, 4 vols. Verona 1740.Google Scholar
Antonino of Florence, Confessionale “Defecerunt.” Milan 1472.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Alexander, De usuris. Bologna 1486.Google Scholar
Astesanus of Asti, Summa de casibus conscientiae. Lyon 1519.Google Scholar
Azo, Summa Iuris Civilis. Basel 1563.Google Scholar
Bartolomeo of San Concordio, Summa de casibus conscientiae. Venice 1482.Google Scholar
Bartolus of Sassoferrato, In primam Codicis partem. Basel 1588.Google Scholar
Bernardino of Siena, Quadragesimale de Evangelio aeterno, in Opera Omina, Vols. III–V. Quaracchi 1956.Google Scholar
Bernardino of Siena, Prediche volgari (Florence 1424), ed. C. Cannarozzi, 2 vols. Florence 1934.Google Scholar
Bernardino of Siena, Prediche volgari (Siena 1427), ed. C. Delcorno, 2 vols. Milan 1989.Google Scholar
Buridan, John, Quaestiones super octo libros Politicorum Aristotelis. Paris 1489.Google Scholar
Caimi, Bartolomeo, Interrogatorium sive confessionale. Milan 1474.Google Scholar
Capitularia Regum Francorum, ed. A. Boretius, 2 vols., in Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Legum II. Hannover 1883–97.Google Scholar
Carletti, Angelo, Summa de casibus conscientiae. Venice 1487.Google Scholar
Decretum Gratiani cum Glossa ordinaria. Basel 1512.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John, Quaestiones in quartum librum Sententiarum. Paris 1894.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome, De regimine principum. Rome 1556.Google Scholar
Henry of Hesse, De contractibus. Cologne 1484.Google Scholar
Hostiensis (Henry of Susa), Summa aurea. Lyon 1537.Google Scholar
Hostiensis (Henry of Susa), Apparatus super Decretales. Strasbourg 1512.Google Scholar
Innocent IV, In quinque libros Decretalium commentaria. Lyon 1562.Google Scholar
John of Erfurt, Summa confessorum. Frankfurt/M 1980.Google Scholar
John of Freiburg, Summa confessorum. Lyon 1518.Google Scholar
Nider, John, De contractibus mercatorum. s.l.a. (Hain 11824).Google Scholar
Odofredus, In primam Codicis partem praelectiones. Lyon 1550.Google Scholar
Oresme, Nicole, Tractatus de origine, natura, iure et mutationibus monetarum. London 1956.Google Scholar
Oresme, Nicole, Le livre de Politiques d'Aristote. Philadelphia 1970.Google Scholar
Pacifico of Cerano, Somma Pacifica. Milan 1479.Google Scholar
Placentinus, Summa Codicis. Mainz 1536.Google Scholar
Raniero of Pisa, Pantheologia. Venice 1585.Google Scholar
Raymond of Peñafort, Summa de paenitentia. Rome 1976.Google Scholar
Rufinus, Summa decretorum. Paderborn 1902.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas, Sententia libri Politicorum, in Opera Omnia (Leonine edition), Vol. 48.Google Scholar
Thomas, Aquinas, Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, in Opera Omnia (Parma edition), Vols. 6–7.Google Scholar
Trovamala, Battista, Summa Rosella. Pavia 1489.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

De Roover, Raymond (1951) Monopoly Theory Prior to Adam Smith: A Revision, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65 (11), pp. 492–524.Google Scholar
Gordon, Barry (1975) Economic Analysis before Adam Smith: Hesiod to Lessius (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd (1992) Economics in the Medieval Schools (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd (1998) The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Langholm, Odd (2003) The Merchant in the Confessional (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar