Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:34:24.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Inertia and Economic Dynamics: Pareto on Business Cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Mauro Boianovsky  and
Vincent J. Tarascio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the second volume of his Cours, published a hundred years ago, Vilfredo Pareto (1897, section 928) put forward what was probably the first mathematical model of the business cycle. Apart from Knut Wicksell's (1899) review of Pareto's book and Jess Benhabib's (1979) short article (partly based on Wicksell's comments), Pareto's model has gone unnoticed. According to the view advanced by Pareto in the 1890s, concepts from physics are essential, not only in the realm of static equilibrium, but also in the investigation of economic dynamics. The model follows a new presentation by Pareto of his equations of general equilibrium, where he attempted to take into account the influence of “inertia” (habit) by applying d'Alembert's principle of mechanics. He concludes that the solution to the consumption equations has a cyclical pattern and uses that to explain business cycles as oscillations in aggregate production driven by changes in consumption.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 5 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amoroso, L. 1935. “La Dynamique de la Circulation,” Econometrica, 3, 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoroso, L. 1938. “Vilfredo Pareto,” Econometrica, 6, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoroso, L. 1942. Meccanica Economica: lezione tenute nell'ano academico 1940–41, Bari, Macri.Google Scholar
Amoroso, L. 1965. “Pareto Matematico ed Economista,” introduction to Pareto 1965, ix–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Becker, G. 1992. “Habits, Addictions, and Traditions,” Kyklos, 45, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J. 1979. “Pareto vs Wicksell on Adjustment Costs in Consumption: A Reformulation,” Economics Letters, 2, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boianovsky, M. 1995. “Wicksell's Business Cycle,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2, 375–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L. von. 1898. “Die Grenznutzentheorie als Grundlage einer ultraliberalen Wirtschaftspolitik,” Schmollers Jahrbuch, 22, 1177–1216.Google Scholar
Boumans, M. 1993. “Paul Ehrenfest and Jan Tinbergen: A Case of Limited Physics Transfer,” in Marchi, N. de, ed., 1993, 131–156.Google Scholar
Busino, G., ed. 1966–1974. Vilfredo Pareto: Œuvres Complètes, Genève, Droz.Google Scholar
Busino, G. 1989. L'Italia di Vilfredo Pareto, Banca Commerciale Italiana, Milan.Google Scholar
Busino, G., ed. 1991. Pareto Oggi, 11 Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
Chipman, J. S. 1976. “The Paretian Heritage,” Revue Européene des Sciences Sociales, 14, 65–171.Google Scholar
Cirillo, R. 1979. The Economics of Vilfredo Pareto, Frank Cass, London.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1993. “Analogy, Homology, and Metaphor in the Interactions between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, Especially Economics,” in Marchi, N. de, ed., 1993, 7–44.Google Scholar
Creedy, F. 1934. “On Equations of Motion of Business Activity,” Econometrica, 2, 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, N. de, ed., 1993. Non-Natural Social Sciences: Reflecting on the Enterprise of “More Heat than Light,” Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
Demaria, G. 1952. “Demaria on Pareto,” in Spiegel, H. W., ed., The Development of Economic Thought, Wiley, New York, 628–651.Google Scholar
des Essars, P. 1895. “La Vitesse de la circulation de la monnaie,” Journal de la Societé de Statistique de Paris, 36, April.Google Scholar
Dimand, R. 1988. “Early Mathematical Theories of Business Cycles,” in Moggridge, D. E., ed., Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, 4, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. 1991. “Il metodo degli equilibri successive di Pareto I il problema della dinamica economica,” in Busino, G., ed., 1991, chapter 3.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1903. “Review of Pareto's Anwendungen der Mathematik auf Nationalökonomie,” Economic Journal, 13, 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Freeman, C. 1987. “Long Swings in Economic Growth,” in Eatwell, J.et al., ed., The New Palgrave, 3, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Freund, J. 1974. Pareto: La Theorie de l'équilibre, Seghers, Paris.Google Scholar
Gelderen, J. van. 1913. “Springvloed: beschouwingen over industrielle ontwikkeling en prijsbeweging,” Die Nieuwe Tijd, 18, 253–277, 369–84, 445–464.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. A. E. and J., Presley. 1994. “Real Business Cycles Theory: A Restatement of Robertsonian Economics?,” Economic Notes, 23, 275–291.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. 1991. “L'analogia meccanica nel pensiero di Pareto,” in Busino, G., ed., 1991, chapter 4.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. 1994. “Physical Metaphors and Models in Pareto's Thought,” Archives Internationales d'Historie des Sciences, 44, 63–91.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G.. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Juglar, C. 1889. Des Crises Commerciales, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Keppler, J. H. 1994. “Luigi Amoroso (1886–1965): Mathematical Economist, Italian Corporatist,” History of Political Economy, 26, 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanczos, C. 1962. The Variational Principles of Mechanics, 2d. ed., University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Lindahl, E., ed., 1958. Knut Wicksell—Selected Papers on Economic Theory, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehans, J. 1992. “Juglar's Credit Cycle,” History of Political Economy, 24, 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, V. 1892. “Considerazioni sui Principii Fondamentali Dell'Economia Politica Pura,” Giornale degli Economisti, 4, May, 389–420.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1893. “Considerazioni sui Principii Fondamentali Dell'Economia Politica Pura,” Giornale degli Economisti, 7, October, 279–321.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1896–1897. Cours D'Economie Politique, Droz, Genève, 1964.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1897a. “The New Theory of Economics,” in Busino, G., ed., 1974, 16, 132–144.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1897b. “Il Compito della Sociologia fra la Scienze Sociali,” in Mongardini, C., ed., Vilfredo Pareto: Dell'Economia alla Sociologia, Bulzoni, Roma, 1973, 93–104.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1897c. “Quelques Exemples d'Application des Mèthodes d'Interpolation à la Statistique”, in Busino, G., ed. 1966, 8, 76–88.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1898. “Comment se pose le problème de l'économie pure,” Revue Européene des Sciences Sociales, 1, 1963, 121–130.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1901. “Note sulle Equazioni Dell'Equlibrio Dinamico,” Tipografia Garagnani, Bologna, reprint from Giornale degli Economisti, September.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1902a. “Anwendungen der Mathematik auf Nationalökonomie,” in Busino, G., ed., 1966, 8, 126–152.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1902b. “L'Economie Pure,” in Busino, G. ed., 1966, 9, 124–136.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1906. Manuale di Economia Politica, Bizzani, Roma, 1965.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1907a. “Crise Financiére ou Economique?,” in Lettres D'Italie, Droz, Genève, 1967, 159–161.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1907b. “Crise Future,” in Lettres D'Italie, Droz, Genève, 1967, 162–164.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1909. Manual of Political Economy, translated by A. S. Schwier, Macmillan, London, 1971.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1911. “Rentiers et Spéculateurs,” in Busino, G., ed., 1966, 6, 273–279.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1913. “Alcune relazioni tra lo stato sociale e le variazioni della prosperitá economica,” Rivista Italiana di Sociologia, 7, 501–518.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1916. The Mind and Society: A Treatise on General Sociology, 4, translated by A. Bongiorno and A. Livingston, Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1935.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1917. “Forme di Fenomeni economici e previsioni,” Fatti e Teorie, Vallecchi, Firenze, 1920, 87–103.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1918. “Economia Sperimentale,” in Demaria, G., ed., Vilfredo Pareto: Scritti Teorici, R. Malfasi, Milano, 1952, 573–590.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1937. The Structure of Social Action, 1, Free Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1949. “Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923),” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63, 147–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. 1950. “The Development of Utility Theory,” in Essays in the History of Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965.Google Scholar
Tarascio, V. J. 1968. Pareto's Methodological Approach to Economics, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Tarascio, V. J. 1969. “The Monetary and Employment Theories of Vilfredo Pareto,” History of Political Economy, 1, 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1929. “Konjunkturforschung und Variationsrechnung,” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 61, 533–541.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1899. “Vilfredo Pareto's Cours d'économie politique, 2,” in Lindahl, 1958, 151–158.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1901. Lectures on Political Economy, 1, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1907. “The Enigma of Business Cycles,” International Economic Papers, 1953, 3, 58–74.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1913. “Vilfredo Pareto's Manuel d'Économie politique, 2,” in Lindahl, 1958, 159–175.Google Scholar