Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:18:48.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

McCulloch, Scrope, and Hodgskin: Nineteenth-Century Versions of Julian Simon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

William S. Kern
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5023.

Extract

In The Ultimate Resource (1981, 1996), and in many other publications over the last several decades, Julian Simon put forth controversial views regarding the connection between natural resource scarcity, population growth, and economic progress. Simon argued, in contrast to those espousing the limits to growth, that natural resources were not getting scarcer, but more abundant, and that a large and growing population was an asset rather than a liability in the pursuit of economic growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright The History of Economics Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter. 1992. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica 60 (2): 32352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions. In Nelson, R. R., ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press for the NBER.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1996. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1981. Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long-Term Trends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1990. Economic and Demographic Relationships in Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Henry C. 1847. The Past, The Present & The Future. New York: Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
Foley, D. 2000. Stabilization of Human Population Through Economic Increasing Returns. Economics Letters 68 (3): 30917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Henry. 1879. Progress and Poverty. New York: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, 1938.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene and Helpman, Elhanan. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. 1971. American Inventiveness: 18701920, Journal of Political Economy 79 (3): 66167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1827. Popular Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1966.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1997. The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, J. 1995. The Origins of Thomas Hodgskin's Critique of Political Economy. History of Political Economy 27 (3): 493515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. Gale. 1999. Population and Economic Development. China Economic Review 10 (1): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karayiannis, A. 1998. Supply-Push and Demand-Pull Factors of Technological Progress in the Early Decades of the 19th Century (18001840). History of Economic Ideas 6 (2): 4568.Google Scholar
Kelley, Allen. 1972. Scale Economies, Inventive Activity, and the Economics of American Population Growth. Explorations in Economic History 10 (1): 3552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, M. 1993. Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (30): 681716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1960. Population Change and Aggregate Output. In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Ronald. 1988. Induced Population Growth and Induced Technological Progress: Their Interaction in the Accelerating Stage. Mathematical Population Studies I (3): 26588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, J.R. 1864. The Principles of Political Economy, 5th edition. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1970. J. R. McCulloch: A Study in Classical Economics. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Petty, William. 1683. Another Essay in Political Arithmetic. In Hull, Charles H., ed., Economic Writings of Sir William Petty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1889.Google Scholar
Romer, P. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 100237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous Technical Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, part II): S71S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scrope, G. P. 1833. Principles of Political Economy Deduced from the Natural Laws of Social Welfare and Applied to the Present State of Britain. New York: Kelley, 1969.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1836. Outline of the Science of Political Economy. New York: Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1977. The Economics of Population Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1981. The Ultimate Resource. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. 1986. Theory of Population and Economic Growth. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1989. The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1990. Population Matters. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1995. The State of Humanity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1998. The Economics of Population: Classic Writings. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. 1976. The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith. Journal of Political Economy 84 (6): 11991213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T. 2001. Environmental Economics and Policy. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar