Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:23:20.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MCCARTHYISM AND THE MATHEMATIZATION OF ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

E. Roy Weintraub
E. Roy Weintraub*
Affiliation:
Emeritus Professor of Economics, Duke University, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historians of the social sciences and historians of economics have come to agree that, in the United States, the 1940s transformation of economics from political economy to economic science was associated with economists’ engagements with other disciplines—e.g., mathematics, statistics, operations research, physics, engineering, cybernetics—during and immediately after World War II. More controversially, some historians have also argued that the transformation was accelerated by economists’ desires to be safe, to seek the protective coloration of mathematics and statistics, during the McCarthy period. This paper argues that that particular claim 1) is generally accepted, but 2) is unsupported by good evidence, and 3) what evidence there is suggests that the claim is false.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 571 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amadae, Sonia M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 2014. “Hans Apel, Samuelson’s Economics, and Academic Freedom, 1950–57 (Version 2).” Discussion paper. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E., and Fontaine, Philippe. 2014. “Contested Identities: The History of Economics since 1945.” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe, eds., A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellman, Richard E. 1984. Eye of the Hurricane: An Autobiography. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Thomas. 1997. “Politics, Intellect, and the American University, 1945–1995.” Daedalus 126 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
Binmore, Kenneth. (2012). “Book Review of Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960.” History of Political Economy 44 (3): 546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1999. “The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics after World War II?” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Creedy, John, eds., From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 257–280.Google Scholar
Brazer, Marjorie C. 1981. “The Economics Department of the University of Michigan: A Centennial Retrospective.” In Hymans, Saul H., ed., Economics and the World Around It. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 133–275.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1988. “Instead of a Philosophy of Life.” The American Economist 32 (2): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1993. “Wisconsin 1947–1957: Reflections and Confessions.” In Lampman, Robert J., ed., Economists at Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 130–138.Google Scholar
Buckley, William F. 1951. God and Man at Yale. New York: Regnery Publishing.Google Scholar
Carleton, Don E. 1985. Red Scare! Right-wing Hysteria, Fifties Fanaticism, and Their Legacy in Texas. Austin: Texas Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Colander, David C., and Landreth, Harry, eds. 1996. The Coming of Keynesianism to America: Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
de Antonio, Emile, and Talbot, Daniel. 1964. Point of Order! New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Düppe, Till, and Roy Weintraub, E.. 2014. Finding Equilibrium: Arrow, Debreu, McKenzie and the Problem of Scientific Credit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1991. “Political Science in the United States Past and Present.” In Easton, David and Schelling, Corinne S., eds., Divided Knowledge: Across Disciplines, across Cultures. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
Fones-Wolf, Elizabeth A. 1994. Selling Free Enterprise: The Business Assault on Labor and Liberalism, 1945–60. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, Mary. 1975. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865-1905. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Sciences: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giraud, Yann. 2014. “Negotiating the ‘Middle of the Road’ Position: Paul Samuelson, MIT, and the Politics of Textbook Writing, 1945–55.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., MIT and the Transformation of American Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 134–152.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd. 1999. “The Patrons of Economics in a Time of Transformation.” In Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, eds., From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 53–81.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David. A. 2002. “Religion, Ethnicity, and Politics in American Philosophy: Reflections on McCumber’s Time in the Ditch.” Philosophical Studies 102: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Philo A. 1997. “McCarthyism and the Professoriate: A Historiographic Nightmare?” In Smart, John C. and Tierney, William, eds., Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 12. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 610–627.Google Scholar
Hymans, Saul H., ed. 1982. Economics and the World Around It. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Klausner, Samuel Z., and Lidz, Victor M., eds. 1986. The Nationalization of the Social Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Thielens, Wagner. 1958. The Academic Mind: Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Fredric. 2009. A History of Heterodox Economics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIver, Robert M. 1955. Academic Freedom in Our Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marschak, Thomas. 2016. Email to E. Roy Weintraub, March 10.Google Scholar
McCormick, Charles H. 1989. This Nest of Vipers: McCarthyism and Higher Education in the Mundell Affair, 1951–52. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
McCumber, John. 2001. Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip E. 2002. Machine Dreams. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco. 2001. Adventures of an Economist. NewYork: TEXERE LLC.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 2003. “Economics.” In Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, eds., The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 7: The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., and Rutherford, Malcolm, eds. 1999. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rancan, Antonella. 2008. “Academic McCarthyism at the University of Illinois: An Integration.” Working Paper, CHOPE, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol. 2000. Certainties and Doubts. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Reisch, George A. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed the Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W. 2002. The Age of McCarthyism. Second edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
Selcraig, James T. 1982. The Red Scare in the Midwest, 1945–1955. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Research Press.Google Scholar
Solberg, Winton, and Tomilson, Robert. 1997. “Academic McCarthyism and Keynesian Economics: The Bowen Controversy at the University of Illinois.” History of Political Economy 29 (1): 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, George R. 1950. The Year of the Oath. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Streeten, Paul P. 2000. “What’s Wrong with Contemporary Economics?” The Pakistan Development Review 39 (3): 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thielens, Wagner. 1996. “McCarthyism and Academic Freedom: Why Wasn’t the Damage Worse? Some Answers from the Academic Mind.” William Mitchell Law Review 22: 421–450.Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel. 1958. “Mind and Market in Academic Life.” The Griffin 7 (13): 4–17.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2014a. “MIT’s Openness to Jewish Economists.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., MIT and the Transformation of American Economics. Durham NC: Duke University Press, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, ed. 2014b. MIT and the Transformation of American Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar