Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:33:21.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Macroeconomics of Margaret Thatcher

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Extract

The government of Margaret Thatcher forms a revealing case study of how economic ideas become entwined with the political and economic history of any country where attempts are made to apply them. As each of the papers in this symposium points out, Thatcher and her government became inextricably associated with “monetarism.” They were influenced by a range of economists, including Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek, but the policies that went under the label of monetarism ended up being very different from what one would expect from reading the academic literature on monetarism. Though it shared important features, Monetarism came to mean something very diferent from, for example, Friedman's quantity theory. More significantly, the meaning of monetarism and the way it was applied changed signi cantly during the government's period in office. Many of these changes were in response to specific economic problems that the government was forced to confront. To understand the way economic ideas developed, and why monetarism was interpreted in the way it was, therefore, it is important to understand the macroeconomic history of the period. That is the purpose of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, Roger E. 1983. Macroeconomics and the British Economy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 1991. Applied UK Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bean, C. and Symons, J.. 1989. “Ten Years of Mrs. T.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 1361 (see also the comments by W. D. Nordhaus and W. Eltis, pp. 61–71).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buiter, Willem and Miller, Marcus. 1981. “The Thatcher Experiment: The First Two Years.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2): 269332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buiter, Willem and Miller, Marcus. 1983. “Changing the Rules: Economic Consequences of the Thatcher Regime.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2): 305–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Geoffrey. 1994. Conflict of Loyalty. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher 1991. The Economy Under Mrs Thatcher, 1979–90. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lawson, Nigel. 1995. The View From No. 11: Memoirs of a Tory Radical. London: Corgi Books.Google Scholar
Layard, P. R. G. and Nickell, S.. 1989. “The Thatcher Miracle?American Economic Review 79 (2): 215–20.Google Scholar
Miles, David. 1992. “Housing and the Wider Economy in the Short and Long Run.” National Institute Economic Review (02): 6477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Margaret. 1993. The Downing Street Years. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Van Ark, Bart. 1990. “Comparative Levels of Manufacturing Labour Productivity in Postwar Europe.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (4): 343–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar