Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:28:56.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Macroeconometric Models and the Methodology of Macroeconomics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

John Lodewijks
John Lodewijks
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“The stimulation given by the General Theory to the construction and testing of aggregative models may well prove to be Keynes's chief contribution to economics in the longer perspective of historical judgement.”

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989 , pp. 33 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, F. Gerard and Rowe, David M.. 1973. Forecasts and Simulations from the Wharton Econometric Model: 1973–1974 Edition. New Jersey: General Learning PressGoogle Scholar
Ando, , Albert, , Fisher, Franklin M., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1963. Essays on the Structure of Social Science Models. Cambridge: The M.I.T. PressGoogle Scholar
Anon, . 1972. Of Men and Models. Brookings Bulletin, Summer pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
Ball, R.J. 1981. On Lawrence R. Klein's Contributions to Economics The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 83:1 pp. 81–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1957. A New Look at Institutionalism AER:P+P 47:205 pp. 1–12Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Martin. 1972. Sensitivity Analysis for Econometricians. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business. Autumn. 11:4 pp. 57–66Google Scholar
Burns, Arthur F. 1949, Comments. AER:P+P 39:305 pp. 77–83Google Scholar
Burns, Arthur F. (ed.) 1952. Wesley C. Mitchell: The Economic Scientist New York: NBERGoogle Scholar
Burns, Arthur F. 1954. The Frontiers of Economic Knowledge NBER Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, Neil. 1981. Review of Blaug's The Methodology of Economics Economic Journal, 09Google Scholar
Duesenberry, James S, Gary, Fromm, Klein, Lawrence R., and Edwin, Kuh (eds.) 1965. The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the Unites States Chicago: McNallyGoogle Scholar
Duggal, V.G. et al. 1974. The Wharton Model Mark III: A Modern IS-LM Construct. International Economic Review, vol. 15:3, 10, pp. 572–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Otto. 1978. The Data Resources Model: Historical Perspective and an Overview in The Great Recession. Data Resources Series No. 3, New York: North HollandGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Otto 1983. The DRI Model of the US Economy. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, Otto and Gary, Fromm. 1968. The Price Equation. AER 58:512 pp. 1159–1183Google Scholar
Evans, Michael K. 1969. Macroeconomic Activity: An Econometric Approach. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Fair, Ray C. 1974. 1976. A Model of Macroeconomic Activity Cambridge: Ballinger Vol. I. Vol II.Google Scholar
Fels, Rendings and Siegfried, John J. (eds.), 1974, Recent Advances in Economics AEA Illinois: IrwinGoogle Scholar
Fisher, G.S. 1952. Some Comments on Stochastic Macro-Economic Models. AER 42:409 pp. 528–539Google Scholar
Frazer, William J. Jr. 1973. Crisis in Economic Theory. Gainesville: University of Florida PressGoogle Scholar
Fromm, Gary and Lawrence R., Klein. 1965. The Brookings-S.S.R.C. Quarterly Econometric Model of the U.S.: Model Properties. AER:P+P 55:205 pp. 348–361Google Scholar
Fromm, Gary, and Paul, Taubman. 1968. Policy Simulation with an Econometric Model. Washington D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Robert A. 1949. Business Cycles in the Interwar Period: the ‘Quantitative-Historical’ Apporach AER:P+P 39:305 pp. 47–63Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert A. and Klein, Lawrence R. (eds.). 1965. Readings in Business Cycles AEA. Illinois: IrwinGoogle Scholar
Grahl, J. 1979. Econometric Methods in Macroeconomics: A Critical Appraisal, in Green, F. and Nore, P.Issues in Political Economy, London: Macmillan, pp. 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried (ed.). 1944. Readings in Business Cycle Theory. AER Illinois: IrwinGoogle Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1963. Prosperity and Depression. New York: AtheneumGoogle Scholar
Haley, Bernard F. 1953. Some Contemporary Tendencies in Economic Research. AER:P+P 43:205 pp. 417–428Google Scholar
Hansen, Alvin H. and Clemence, Richard V. (eds.). 1953. Readings in Business Cycles and National Income New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
Hickman, Bert G. (ed.). 1965. The Quantitative Planning of Economic Policy. Washington D.C.: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Abraham. 1976. The a posteriori method and the creation of new theory: W.C. Mitchell as a case study. History of Political Economy 8:2Summer pp. 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intriligator, Michael D. 1980. Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications New Delhi: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Harry G. 1961. The General Theory after Twenty-Five Years AER:P+P 51:205 pp. 1–17Google Scholar
Johnston, J. 1972. Econometric Methods Tokyo: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1935. A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles. Econometrica. 3, pp. 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelejian, Harry H. and Wallace E., Oates. 1974. Introduction to Econometrics New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. 1984. Conversations with Economists. New Jersey: Rowman and AllanheldGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence R. 1947. The Use of Econometric Models as a Guide to Economic Policy. Econometrica, 15. pp. 111–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence R. 1981. Econometric Models as Guides for Decision-Making. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Klein, Lawrence R. 1986. Economic Policy Formation: Theory and Implementation, in Griliches, Z. and Intriligator, M.D. (eds.). Handbook of Econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland, vol. 3 ch. 35Google Scholar
Klein, Lawrence R. and Edwin, Burmeister (eds.) 1976. Econometric Model Performance, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, Jan and Ramsey, James B. (eds.) 1981. Large-Scale Macro-econometric Models Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1965. Measurement without Theory. (1947) in Gordon, and Klein, pp. 186–203Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1965. A Reply. (1949) in Gordon, and Klein, pp. 218–225Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1949. The Econometric Approach to Business Fluctuations. AER:P+P, 39:305 pp. 64–72Google Scholar
Kuh, Edwin. 1965. Econometric Models: Is a New Age Dawning? AER:P+P 55:205 pp. 362–369Google Scholar
Leamer, Edward E. 1983. Lets Take The Con Out of Econometrics AER, 73:103 pp. 31–43Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. 1981. Studies in Business-Cycle Theory. Massachusetts: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr and Sargent, Thomas J.. 1978. After Keynesian Macroeconomics in Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, After the Phillips Curve Conference Series No. 19 06. Comments by Friedman, Benjamin M. pp. 73–80 and Robert M. Solow pp. 203–209Google Scholar
McGinley, Laurie. 1983. Clouded Vision. Wall Street Journal 02 17Google Scholar
Nerlove, Marc. 1962. A Quarterly Econometric Model for the United Kingdom. AER, 52:103 p. 154–176Google Scholar
Ruggles, Richard. 1952. Methodological Developments in Haley, B.F. (ed.) A Survey of Contemporary Economics, vol. II, Illinois: Irwin. pp. 408–457Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1939. Interactions Between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration. Review of Economics and Statistics, 21, 05. pp. 75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, Henry W. 1966. The Development of Economic Thought. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Spivey, W. Allen and Wrobleski, William J.. 1979. Econometric Model Performance in Forecasting and Policy Assessment. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar
Stein, Herbert. 1984. Presidential Economics. New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
Suits, Daniel B. 1963. The Theory and Application of Econometric Models. Training Seminar No. 3, Athens: Center of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1935. Annual Survey: Suggestions on Quantitative Business Cycle Theory. Econometrica, 3, pp. 241–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, John H. 1948. An Appraisal of Keynesian Economics. AER:P+P, 38:205 pp. 273–290Google Scholar