Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:38:16.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge Problems and the Problem of Social Cost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Roy E. Cordato
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ronald Coase's 1960 article, “The Problem of Social Cost,” has been one of the most influential works in the development of welfare economics since A. C. Pigou's The Economics of Welfare. Principally, the article made the definition and distribution of property rights a central issue when discussing the efficiency problems of negative externalities. Coase's approach has given rise to most of the economics of tort law and alternative liability rules. It has also led to the development of the “property rights” approach to environmental economics that has found prominence as an alternative to traditional Pigovian analysis.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Fall 1992 , pp. 209 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boettke, Peter. 1989. “Comment on Joseph Farrell, Information and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, no. 2, 195–97.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1969. Cost and Choice, Markham Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1981. “Introduction: L.S.E. Cost Theory in Retrospect,” in Buchanan, and Thirlby, 1981, 1–19.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James and Thirlby, G. F.. 1981. L.S.E. Essays on Cost, New York University Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1938. “Business Organization and the Accountant,” in Buchanan, and Thirlby, 1981, 95–134.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordato, Roy E. 1989. “Subjective Value, Time Passage, and the Economics of Harmful Effects,” Hamline Law Review, 12, no. 2, 229–44.Google Scholar
Cordato, Roy E. 1992. Welfare Economics and Externalities in an Open-Ended Universe, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston and London.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. 1973. “A Theory of Strict Liability,” Journal of Legal Studies, 2, no. 1, 151–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Joseph. 1987. “Information and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, no. 1, 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, John C. 1978. “An Economic Theory of the Evolution of the Common Law,” Journal of Legal Studies, 7, no. 2, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge,” Economica, n.s., 4, 33–54; page numbers refer to reprint in Buchanan and Thirlby 1981, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, 35, no. 4; page numbers refer to reprint in Hayek, 1948.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order, Gateway Editions, South Bend, Indiana, 77–91.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1948. “The Meaning of Competition,” in Hayek, 1948a, 92–106.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1955. The Counter-Revolution of Science, Collier-Macmillan Limited, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation, and Liberty, 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Kirzner, Israel. 1963. Market Theory and the Price System, D. Van Nostrand, Princeton.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Ludwig. 1976. “On the Central Concept of Austrian Economics,” in Edwin, Dolan, ed., The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Sheed and Ward, Kansas City, 126–32.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard. 1985. “Knowledge and Rationality in the Austrian School: An Analytic Survey,” Eastern Economic Journal, 9, no. 4, 309–30.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, R. K.. 1957. “The General Theory of Second-Best,” Review of Economic Studies, 24, no. 1, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1952. The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. Mitchell. 1979. “Controlling Externalities and Protecting Entitlements: Property Right, Liability Rule, and Tax-Subsidy Approaches,” Journal of Legal Studies, 8, no. 1, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A. Mitchell. 1983. An Introduction to Law and Economics, Little Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1973. Economic Analysis of the Law, Little Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Priest, George L. 1977. “The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules,” Journal of Legal Studies, 6, no. 1, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, Mario J. 1980a. “Law Amid Flux: The Economics of Negligence and Strict Liability,” Journal of Legal Studies, 9, no. 2, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, Mario J. 1980b. “The Mirage of Efficiency,” Hofstra Law Review, 8, no. 3, 641–58.Google Scholar
Rubin, Paul H. 1977. “Why is the Common Law Efficient?” Journal of Legal Studies, 6, no. 1, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven. 1980. “Strict Liability vs. Negligence,” Journal of Legal Studies, 4, no. 1, 1–26.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Karen I. 1980. “Does it Matter that Costs are Subjective?” Southern Economic Journal, 46, no. 3, 702–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar