Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:31:49.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Keeping Whig History Honest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Paul A. Samuelson
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barton, John, 1817. Observations on the Circumstances Which Influence the Condition of the Labouring Classes of Society. London: Arch.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Edward H., 1933. Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R., 1932. Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel, 1987. Classical Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurdos, Cigdem, 1988. “The ‘Whig Historian’ Adam Smith: Paul Samuelson's Canonical Classical Model,” History of Economics Society Bulletin, Spring.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Bertil, 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1961. “Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory,Oxford Economic Papers 13, 5358.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A., 1959, “A Modern Treatment of the Ricardian Economy,Quarterly Journal of Economics 73, 135, 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Literature 16, 14151434. Reproduced as Ch. 340, Vol. V. Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Crowley, K. (ed.) (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1982. “Quesnay's ‘Tableau Économique’ as a Theorist Would Formulate It Today,” in Classical and Marxian Political Economy: Essays in Honor of Ronald L. Meek. London: Macmillan. Reproduced as Ch. 343, Vol. V, Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Crowley, K. (ed.) (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1982. “Marx as Mathematical Economist: Steady-State and Exponential-Growth Equilibrium,” in Horwich, G. and Samuelson, P. (eds.) Trade, Stability and Macroeconomic Essays in Honor of Lloyd A. Metzler. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Reproduced as Ch. 225 in Collected Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Vol. 4, 1977.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1987. “Out of the Closet: A Program for Whig History of Economic Science.History of Economics Society Bulletin, Fall.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A., 1911 (1934 English translation). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. Edwin Cannan edition, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1951. Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press for Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
von Thúnen, J. Heinrich, 1826. The Isolated State, first German edition.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress,Economic Journal 38, 527542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar