Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:02:38.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JOHN STUART MILL AND THE EMPLOYMENT OF MARRIED WOMEN: RECONCILING UTILITY AND JUSTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

NATHALIE SIGOT  and
CHRISTOPHE BEAURAIN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 281 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annas, J. 1977. “Mill and the Subjection of Women.” Philosophy 52. Reprint in Smith, G. W., ed., 1998, vol. IV, pp. 231–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, T. 1980. “Was Bentham a Feminist?” The Bentham Newsletter 4 (May): 26–32. Reprint in Parekh, B., ed., Jeremy Bentham Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge, 1993, vol. IV, pp. 230–38.Google Scholar
Beaurain, Ch. and Sigot, N.. 2009. “L’esclavage et l’asservissement des femmes chez John Stuart Mill: de la contrainte aux choix.” Oeconomia. To be published.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1785–1786. Principles of the Civil Code. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Bowring, J.. Edinbourgh: Tait, 1843, part. II, pp. 297–364.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1823–1832. Constitutional Code. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, edited by Bowring, J.. Edinbourgh: Tait, 1843, parts XVII and XVIII, pp. 1–662.Google Scholar
Bodkin, R. G. 1999. “Women's Agency in Classical Economic Thought: Adam Smith, Harriet Taylor Mill, and J. S. Mill.” Feminist Economics 5 (March): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnette, J. 1997. “An Investigation of the Female-Male Wage Gap During the Industrial Revolution in Britain.” Economic History Review L (2): 257–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos Boralevi, L. 1984. Bentham and the Oppressed. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, W. R. 1989. “Introduction.” In Mill, J. S., The Subjection of Women. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press, pp. v–xxix.Google Scholar
Dimand, R. W., Forget, E. L., and Nyland, Ch.. 2004. “Retrospectives: Gender in Classical Economics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (1): 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. J. 1983. The Forging of the Modern State. Early Industrial Britain 1783–1870. London and New York: Longman, 1987.Google Scholar
Forget, E. 2003. “John Stuart Mill, Harriet Taylor and French Social Theory.” In Dimand, R. and Nyland, Ch., eds, The Status of Women in Classical Economic Thought. Aldershot: E. Elgar, pp. 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1994. “Introduction: Women in Political Economy and Women as Political Economists in Victorian England.” In Groenewegen, P., ed., Feminism and Political Economy in Victorian England. Aldershot: E. Elgar, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Honeyman, K. 2000. Women, Gender and Industrialisation in England, 1700–1870. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jacobs, E. J. 2002. The Voice of Harriet Taylor Mill. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, E. 1989. “The Exclusion of Women from Industry in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 (2): 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. 1999. The Women's Movement and Women's Employment in Nineteenth Century Britain. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 2001. Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. 2007. “The Hesitant Hand: Mill, Sidgwick, and the Evolution of the Theory of Market Failure.” History of Political Economy 39 (3): 331–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendus, S. 1994. “John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor on Women and Marriage.” Utilitas 6 (2). Reprint in Smith, G. W., ed., 1998, vol. IV, pp. 312–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1831. “The Spirit of the Age III.” Examiner 6 Feb. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Newspaper Writings Dec. 1822–July 1831, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986, vol. XXII, pp. 252–58.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1832–3. “On Marriage.” In J. S. Mill, Harriet Taylor Mill, and Helen Taylor, 1831–81, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Robson, J. R.. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965, vols. I–II.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1849–73. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. The Later Letters, edited by Mineka, F. E. and Lindley, D. N.. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972, vols. XIV–XVIII.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1850–73. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Public and Parliamentary Speeches, edited by Robson, J. M. and Kinzer, B. L.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, vols. XXVIII–XXIX.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1859. On Liberty. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Essays on Politics and Society, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, vol. XVIII, pp. 213–310.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861. Utilitarianism. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963, vol. X, pp. 203–259.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1867. “The Admission of Women to the Electoral Franchise.” Speech spoken in the House of Commons, May 20th. In J. S. Mill. 1850–73, vol. XXVIII, pp. 151–62.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1869a. The Subjection of Women. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Essays on Equality, Law and Education, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984, vol. XXI, pp. 249–340.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1869b. “Women's Suffrage.” Speech spoken in a meeting of the London National Society for Women's Suffrage. In J. S. Mill. 1850–73, vol. XXIX, pp. 373–81.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1871. “Women's Suffrage [3].” Speech in The Great Meeting in Favour of Women's Suffrage. In J.S. Mill. 1850–73, vol. XXIX, pp. 402–409.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1873. Autobiography. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Autobiography and Literary Essays, edited by Robson, J. M. and Stillinger, J.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981, vol. I, pp. 5–290.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., Taylor Mill, H., and Taylor, H., 1831–81. Sexual Equality, edited by Robson, A. P. and Robson, J. M.. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mueser, P. 1987. “Discrimination.” In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., eds., The New Palgrave. London: Macmillan, 1991, vol. I, pp. 856–58.Google Scholar
Pinchbeck, I. 1930. Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution 1750–1850. London: Franck Cass, 1977.Google Scholar
Pujol, M. 1992. Feminism and Anti-feminism in Early Economic Thought. Aldershot: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, J. 1985. “Mill's The Subjection of Women: the Methodological Limits of Liberal Feminism.” Review of Politics 47: 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. 1988. Women's Work 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. O. 1987. “Gender Segregation in the Transition to the Factory: The English Hosiery Industry, 1850–1910.” Feminist Studies 13 (1): 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, S. O. 1988. “Gender Antagonism and Class Conflict: Exclusionary Strategies of Male Trade Unionists in Nineteenth-Century Britain.” Social History 13 (2): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. S. 1970. “Sentiment and Intellect. The Story of John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor.” In Mill, J. S. and Taylor Mill, H., Essays on Sex Equality, edited by Rossi, A. S.. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–63.Google Scholar
Seiz, J. A. and Pujol, M. 2000. “Harriet Taylor Mill.” The American Economic Review 90 (2): 476–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, M. L. 1981. “Marital Slavery and Friendship: John Stuart Mill's The Subjection of Women.” Political Theory 9 (2): 229–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, R. B. 1998. Gender in English Society 1650–1850. The Emergence of Separate Spheres? London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, G. W., ed. 1998. John Stuart Mill's Social and Political Thought. Critical Assessments. London: Routledge, 4 vols.Google Scholar
Spitz, E. 1982. “On Shanley ‘Marital Slavery and Friendship.’”Political Theory 10 (3). Reprint in Smith, G. W., ed., 1998, vol. IV, pp. 264–267.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. 1807–39. “Diary.” In Jacobs, J. E., The Voice of Harriet Taylor Mill. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–86.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. 1851. “The Enfranchisement of Woman.” In Mill, J. S. and Taylor Mill, H., Essays on Sex Equality, edited by Rossi, A. S.. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1970, pp. 89–121.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. and Mill, J. S.. 1847–50. “Women's Rights.” In J. S. Mill, H. Taylor Mill and H. Taylor, 1831–81, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. and Mill, J. S.. 1853. “Remarks on Mr. Fitzroy's Bill for the More Effectual Prevention of Assaults on Women and Children.” In J. S. Mill, H. Taylor Mill, and H. Taylor, 1831–81, pp. 92–8.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N. 1991. “John Stuart Mill on Androgyny and Ideal Marriage.” Political Theory 19 (4). Reprint in G. W. Smith, ed., 1998, vol. IV, pp. 268–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williford, M. 1975. “Bentham on the Rights of Women.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1): 167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar