Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:27:13.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JAMES MILL ON INTEMPERANCE AND INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Victor Bianchini
Victor Bianchini*
Affiliation:
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, PHARE.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

James Mill’s account of the decision process is part of his theory of the human mind, which in turn is the cornerstone of his theory of education. Mill believed the end of education was to produce happiness, and that this happiness required action by the individual. A problem, as Mill saw it, was that intemperance might interfere with the decision process, causing individuals to take actions that do not promote their greatest happiness. This paper provides an interpretation of this process from a formal perspective, in the light of Mill’s view on intemperance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 21 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bain, Alexander. 1882. James Mill: A Biography. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S., and Mulligan, Casey B.. 1997. “The Endogenous Determination of Time Preferences.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (3): 729–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. [1789] 1948. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Reprint of 1823 edition. New York: Hafner Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, George S. 1881. Hartley and James Mill. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searl, & Rivington.Google Scholar
Burston, W. H. 1969. James Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burston, W. H. 1973. James Mill on Philosophy and Education. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Francis Alexander. 1931. James & John Stuart Mill on Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1959. “James Mill on Education.” University of Auckland Bulletin 54, Education Series 1.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1961. “Useful Learning: Bentham’s Chresthomatia with Particular Reference to the influence of James Mill on Bentham.” University of Auckland Bulletin 56, Education Series 3.Google Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1962. “The Scottish Education of James Mill.” History of Education Quarterly 2 (3): 152–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, Ian. 1964. “The Second Founder of Association Psychology.” University of Auckland Bulletin 69, Education Series 4.Google Scholar
Crainich, David, Eeckhoudt, Louis, and Rey, Beatrice. 2011. “A propos de la temperance.” Revue économique 62: 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, Gérard. 1954. “Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function.” In Coombs, Clyde H., Davis, Robert L., and Thrall, Robert M., eds., Decision Processes. New York: Wiley, pp. 159–165.Google Scholar
Fenn, Robert A. 1987. James Mill’s Political Thought. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Fenn, Robert A., ed. 2010. James Mill’s Common Place Books. Sussex: University of Sussex. http://intellectualhistory.net/mill. Accessed 31 October 2015.Google Scholar
Halévy, Elie. [1901–1904] 1995. La formation du radicalisme philosophique. Volumes 2 and 3. Les classiques des sciences sociale. Electronic version by Toussaint, Réjeanne and Simonet, Jean-Marc. Paris: Presse Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. 1963. James Mill and the Art of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1739–1740] 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A. [1888] and Nidditch, P. H. [1978]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling. C. 1960. “Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience.” Econometrica 28 (2): 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidus, André. 2010. “The Valuation of Decision and Individual Welfare: A Humean Approach.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidus, André, and Sigot, Nathalie. 2000. “Individual Utility in a Context of Asymmetric Sensitivity to Pleasure and Pain: An Interpretation of Bentham’s Felicific Calculus.” European Journal of History of Economic Thought 7 (1): 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgate, Murray, and Stimson, Shannon C.. 1993. “Utility, Property, and Political Participation: James Mill on Democratic Reform.” The American Political Science Review 87 (4): 901–911.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1804. An Essay of the Impolicy of a Bounty on the Exportation of Grain; and on the Principles which ought to regulate the Commerce of Grain. London: C. and R. Baldwin.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1813. “Education of the Poor.” Edinburgh Review 21 (February): 207–219.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1816a. “Bank for Savings.” In Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1816–1824). Volume 2. Edinburgh: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., pp. 91–101.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1816b. “Benefit Societies.” In Supplement to the 4th, 5th & 6th editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1816–1824). Volume 2. Edinburgh: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., pp. 263–269.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1818] 1825. “Colony.”Reprinted from the Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1819] 1825. “Education.”Reprinted from the Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1820] 1825. “Government.”Reprinted from the Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1821] 1825. “Liberty of the Press.”Reprinted from the Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. London: J. Innes.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1825. “The Edinburgh Review on Parliamentary Reform.” Westminster Review 4: 194–233.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1826a] 1995. Elements of Political Economy. Third edition(first edition in 1821). Reprints of the 1844 edition. Routledge: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826b. “Summary Review of the Conduct and Measures of the Seventh Imperial Parliament.” In Parliamentary History and Review. London, pp. 772–802.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1826c. “State of the Nation.” The Westminster Review 6 (12): 249–278.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1829] 1967. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Second edition [1869], with illustrative and critical notes by Bain, Alexander, Findlater, Andrew, Grote, George, and Mill, John Stuart. Two volumes. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1835. Fragment on Mackintosh. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 1836a. “Aristocracy.” London Review II (January): 283–306.Google Scholar
Mill, James. [1836b] 1966. “Whether Political Economy Is Useful?” London Review 2 (January): 553–572.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 2010a. “Aristocracy.” In Fenn, Robert A., ed., James Mill’s Common Place Books. Sussex: University of Sussex, vol. 1, ch. 9.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 2010b. “Education.” In Fenn, Robert A., ed., James Mill’s Common Place Books. Sussex: University of Sussex, vol. 3, ch. 2.Google Scholar
Mill, James. 2010c. “The Liberty of the Press.” In Fenn, Robert A., ed., James Mill’s Common Place Books. Sussex: University of Sussex, vol. 1, chs. 2 and 3, and vol. 2, ch. 1.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1873] 1981. Autobiography. In Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack, eds., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill Volume I, Autobiography and Literary Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Orain, Arnaud. 2003. “Decline and Progress: The Economic Agent in Condillac’s Theory of History.” European Journal of History of Economic Thought 10 (3): 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigot, Nathalie. 1995. “L’utilitarisme benthamien à la rencontre de l’économie classique.” Doctorat de sciences économiques, université paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Sockwell, William. D. 1994. Popularizing Classical Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wärneryd, Karl-Erik. 2008. “Economics and Psychology: Economic Psychology according to James Mill and John Stuart Mill.” Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 777–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1966. James Mill: Selected Economic Writings. Edinburgh: Oliver Boyd for the Scottish Economic Society.Google Scholar