Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:45:16.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE HUMEAN FOUNDATIONS OF ADAM SMITH'S THEORY OF PROPERTY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, Christopher J. 1997. Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. 1990. “Hume's Account of Property.” Reason Papers 15 (Summer): pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1981. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1993. “The Structure of Hume's Political Theory.” In Fate Norton, David, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, ed. 1994. Hume: Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1996. Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1777. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, third edition, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., revised by P. H., Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1739/1740. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Fate Norton, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Livingston, Donald W. 1984. Hume's Philosophy of Common Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montes, Leonides. 2003. “Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossner, E. C. 1980. The Life of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Otteson, James R. 2002. Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1972-73. “Hume and Adam Smith on Justice and Utility.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s., 73: 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1977. “‘The True Old Humean Philosophy’ and its Influence on Adam Smith.” In Morice, G. P., ed., David Hume: Bicentenary Papers. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1985. Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 2001. Concepts of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Skinner, A. S. and Campbell, R. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1776.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D., and Stein, P. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. and Gordon, Barry. 1992. “Economic Justice in the Natural Law Tradition: Thomas Aquinas to Francis Hutcheson.Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (Spring): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1995. “Natural Jurisprudence and the Theory of Value in Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 27 (4): 755–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 1997. Economics as a Moral Science: The Political Economy of Adam Smith. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey T. 2008. “Law and Economics in the Protestant Natural Law Tradition: Samuel Pufendorf, Francis Hutcheson, and Adam Smith.Journal of the History of Economic Thought forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar