Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:41:28.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HISTORY OF ECONOMICS OR A SELECTED HISTORY OF ECONOMICS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

NUNO PEDRO G. PALMA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Mini-symposium on the Future of History of Economics: Young Scholars' Perspective
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 93 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K. 2001. “The Five Most Significant Developments in Economics of the Twentieth Century.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8 (3): pp. 298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2003. “The Stabilization of Price Theory, 1920-1955.” In Biddle, Jeff, Davis, John B. and Samuels, Warren J., eds., A Companion to the History of Economic Thought, Blackwell. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 308–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. 2000. “What Do We Know About Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1375–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 2001. “No History of Ideas Please, We're Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (1): 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, K. 1971. “After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?” History of Political Economy 3 (2): 225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K. 1988. The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. 2006. “The Uses of the Past.” Working Paper, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Lodewijks, J. 2003. “Research in the History of Economic Thought as a Vehicle for the Defence and Criticism of Orthodox Economics.” In Biddle, Jeff, Davis, John B. and Samuels, Warren J., eds., A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 655–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louçã, F. 2004. “Swinging All the Way: The Education of Doctor Lucas and Foes.” History of Political Economy 36 (4): 689–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. 1998. The Rhetoric of Economics, 2nd edition. Madison, WI: Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar
Moscati, I. 2008. “More Economics, Please: We're Historians of Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (1): pp. 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. 1905. The Life of Reason: or, the Phases of Human Progress, Vol. 1. Reason in Common Sense. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1980.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. and Barnett, W. 2007. Inside the Economist's Mind: Conversations with Eminent Economists. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 1999. “The Randomness of Rational Expectations: A Perspective on Sargent's Early Incentives.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 6 (3): pp. 439–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, M. 1992. “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science.” History of Political Economy 24 (1): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. “Will Economics Ever Have a Past Again?” History of Political Economy 34 (Annual Supplement): pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2006. Economic Science Wars. Jérome A. Blanqui Lecture. Available athttp://www.eshet.net/best/1150129153__blanqui_lecture.pdf.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2007. “Economic Science Wars.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29 (3): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar