Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:15:10.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HISTORICISM AND NEOCLASSICISM IN THE KIEV SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS: THE CASE OF ALEKSANDER BILIMOVICH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

ANDREJ SUŠJAN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aleksander Bilimovich (1876–1963) is often considered to have been one of the last representatives of the Kiev School of economics, which was influenced by the German Historical School as well as by the emerging neoclassical theory. After the Soviet revolution, Bilimovich continued his work in exile and was developing his theoretical and methodological views along two lines of the Kiev tradition. On the one side he maintained the historical approach, and on the other side he was inclined towards the deductivist and mathematical approach. The paper thus questions the established view among the historians of Russian economic thought of Bilimovich as a consistent adherent of marginalism. His work bears also several features of historicism.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 199 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anikin, A. 2002. “Russian Economic Science: Enlightenment and First Schools.” Problems of Economic Transition 44 (9/10): 148–154.Google Scholar
Antsiferov, Alexis N., Bilimovich, Alexander D., Batshev, Michael O., and Ivantsov, Dimitry N. 1930. “Rural Economy.” In Russian Agriculture during the War. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–300.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 2002. The Penguin History of Economics. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Barnett, Vincent. 2004. “Tugan-Baranovsky, the Methodology of Political Economy, and the ‘Russian Historical School’.” History of Political Economy 36 (1): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander. 1930. “The Land Settlement.” In Russian Agriculture during the War. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 301–388.Google Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1951. “Investment and Employer’s Reactions.” Economia Internazionale 4 (4): 847–866.Google Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1953. “A Model of the Undulatory Economic Process.” Economia Internazionale 6 (3): 1–31.Google Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1954. “Einige Schemata der fortschreitenden Wirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 14 (2–4): 273–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1955. “Agriculture and Food in Yugoslavia before, during, and after World War II.” In Zagoroff, S. D., Végh, Jenö, and Bilimovich, Alexander D., The Agricultural Economy of the Danubian Countries 1935–45. A Publication of the Food Research Institute, Stanford University, pp. 289–366.Google Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1958. “Kommentare zu einem neuen kreislauftheoretischen Buch.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 18 (1–2): 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovich, Alexander D. 1959. “Concentration of Agriculture in the United States (Trends and Consequences).” Economia Internazionale 12 (3): 495–527.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1907. Zemleustroiteljnyja zadači i zemleustroiteljnoje zakonodateljstvo Rossii. Kiev: Tipografija Imperatorskago Univerziteta sv. Vladimira.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, A. D. 1915. “Pamjati D.I. Pihno.” In Trudy Kievskago juridičeskago obščestva sostojaščago pri Imperatorskom Univeritetu Sv. Vladimira (Za 1911, 1912, 1913 i 1914 gody). Kiev: Tipografija Imperatorskago Univerziteta Sv. Vladimira, pp. i–xiv.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1921. “Nekoliko misli o narodno-gospodarski vedi [Some thoughts about economic science].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav I. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1924a. “Pojem ‘statike’ in ‘dinamike’ v narodno-gospodarski vedi [‘Statics’ and ‘dynamics’ in economics].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav III. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1924b. “Družba, država in gospodarstvo [Society, state and economy].” Slovenski pravnik 38 (5–6): 136–147.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1926. “Položaj delavcev v Jugoslaviji po poročilih inspekcije dela [The position of workers in Yugoslavia according to the reports of work inspectors].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav. V. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 18–51.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1927. Jugoslavien (Königreich der Serben, Kroaten u. Slovenen) (Einzelheft aus dem Band II der “Osteuropäischen Länderberichte”). Breslau: Verlag von M. & H. Marcus.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1928. “Nove metode proučevanja konjunktur in gospodarska prognoza [New methods in the analysis of cycles and economic forecasting].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav. VI. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 1–21. (Cf. Bilimovič 1929e.)Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1929a. “Irving Fishers statistische Methode für die Bemessung des Grenznutzens.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (1): 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1929b. “Grenzkosten und Preis.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (3): 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1929c. Arbeitsrecht des Königreichs der Serben, Kroaten und Slovenen (Jugoslavien) (Sonderdruck aus Zeitschrift für Ostrecht, III. Jahrgang, Heft 3, 369–388). Berlin: Carl Heymanns Verlag [1929].Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksandr. 1929d. Očerk Narodnago Chozjajstva Korolevstva Serbov, Horvatov i Slovencev [An outline of the national economy of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenians]. Belgrad: Izdanje Russkago Naučnago Instituta v Belgrade (Offprint from Trudy IV Suezda Russkih Akademičeskih Organizacij za granicej, pp. 363–370).Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksandr. 1929e. Novyje metody izučenija konjunktur i ekonomičeskij prognoz [New methods in the analysis of cycles and economic forecasting]. Belgrad: Izdanje Russkago Naučnago Instituta v Belgrade (Offprint from Trudy IV Suezda Russkih Akademičeskih Organizacij za granicej, pp. 371–376).Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1930a. “Matematična obdelava statističnih podatkov Okrožnega urada za zavarovanje delavcev v Ljubljani [Mathematical analysis of statistical data of the Bureau for the insurance of workers in Ljubljana].” Slovenski Pravnik 44 (11–12): 282–289.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1930b. Die Preislehre von Othmar Spann (Sonderabzug aus Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche, Jahrgang 54, Heft 4, pp. 57–82). München: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1931a. Nauk o konjunkturah [Business cycles]. In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav VIII (1930–31). Ljubljana: Samozaložba prof. zbora Juridične fakulteta, pp. 1–184.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1931b. Die Preis- und Wertlehre (Sonderabdruck aus Die Wirtschaftstheorie der Gegenwart, pp. 94–113). Wien: Verlag von Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1931c. “Kritische und positive Bemerkungen zur Geldwerttheorie.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 2 (3, 5): 353–375, 695–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, A. 1932. “Karel Engliš. Begründung der Teleologie als Form des empirischen Erkenns.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3 (2): 296–301.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1933a. Uvod v ekonomsko vedo [An introduction to economics]. Ljubljana: Jugoslovanska knjigarna v Ljubljani.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1933b. “Ein neuer Versuch der Bemessung des Grenznutzens.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4 (2): 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, A. 1933c. “John Maynard Keynes: A Treatise on Money.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4 (2): 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1933d. “Meine Antwort an Herrn Prof. Dr. Karel Engliš.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4 (4): 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1934. “Wie können unmessbare psychische Grössen in das Gleichungs-system der wirtschaftlichen Gleichgewichts eingeführt?” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 5 (2): 145–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1935a. “Oblike obrtnih in industrijskih obratov (Odlomek iz gospodarske morfologije) [The forms of craft- and industry-plants (A fragment from economic morphology)].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav XI. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1935b. “Zum Problem des ‘neutralen’ Geldes.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 6 (1): 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1936. Das Kartellrecht Jugoslawiens (Sonderdruck aus Zeitschrift für Osteuropäisches Recht, N.F. 3. Jahrgang, Heft 2, pp. 67–80). Berlin: Carl Heymanns Verlag.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1937a. “Zur Verteidigung der Gleichgewichtsidee.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 8 (2): 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1937b. “Zins und Unternehmergewinn im Gleichungssystem der stationären Wirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 8 (3): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1938. “Einige Bemerkungen zur Theorie der Planwirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 9 (2): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1939a. “Agrarna struktura Jugoslavije [The structure of Yugoslavian agriculture].” In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav XV. Ljubljana: Juridična fakulteta, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1939b. Agrarna struktura Jugoslavije in Slovenije v primeri z agrarno strukturo nekaterih drugih dežel [The structure of agriculture in Yugoslavia and Slovenia in comparison to the structure of agriculture in some other countries]. Ljubljana: Socialno ekonomski institut v Ljubljani (Zbirka študij št. 4).Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1939c. “Die vergleichende Untersuchung von Agrarstrukturen.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 50 (3): 493–522.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1941. Ekonomska tabela Françoisa Quesnaya [Economic Table of François Quesnay]. Ljubljana: Akademija znanosti in umetnosti v Ljubljani.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1942. “Das allgemeine Schema des wirtschaftlichen Kreislaufes.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 10 (2): 199–241. (This article is often (e.g. in Woog 1950) cited under the year 1944, when volume 10 of the journal was republished.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1943. Nekoliko dinamičnih shem gospodarskega procesa [Some dynamic schemes of economic process]. Ljubljana: Akademija znanosti in umetnosti v Ljubljani.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksander. 1944a. “Razvojna tendenca kmetijstva [The developmental tendency of agriculture].”In Zbornik znanstvenih razprav XX. Ljubljana: Pravna fakulteta, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Alexander. 1944b. “Dynamische Wirtschaft und ihre schematische Darstellung.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 11 (1): 45–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksandr D. 1954. Marksizm (Izloženie i kritika) [Marxism (Exposition and Critique)]. San Francisko (San Francisco): Tipografija Luč (Looch Printing and Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Bilimovič, A. D. 1955. Kooperacija v Rosii do, vo vreme i posle boljševikov [Cooperative in Russia before, during and after bolsheviks]. Frankfurt am Main: Posev.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksandr D. 1956. Sovetskaja kooperacija posle vtoroj mirovoj vojny [Soviet cooperative after the Second World War]. Issledovanija i materiali (Serija 2, No. 40). München: Institut zur Erforschung der UdSSR.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, Aleksandr D. 1959. Era pjatiletnich planov v chozjajstve SSSR [Five-year plans in the Soviet economy]. Issledovanija i materiali (Serija 2, No. 71). München: Institut zur Erforschung der UdSSR.Google Scholar
Bilimovič, A. D. 1960. Ekonomičeskij stroj osvoboždennoj Rosii [The economic system of Russia]. München: Izdateljstvo Centralnogo Objedinenija Političeskih Emigrantov iz SSSR (COPE) – Verlag ZOPE.Google Scholar
Bilimowitsch, A. 1911. “Zur Frage der Bewertung der wirtschaftlichen Güter.” Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung XX: 623–698.Google Scholar
Boettcher, Erik. 1957. “Bilimovich, Alexander D., Marxism. (Exposition and Critique.)” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 78 (1): 70*.Google Scholar
Denis, H. 1897. “Die physiokratische Schule und die erste Darstellung der Wirtschafts-gesellschaft als Organismus.” Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung VI: 89–99.Google Scholar
Englis, Karel. 1933. “Zum Problem der teleologischen Theorie der Wirtschaft.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4 (2): 220–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2005. “Alfred Marshall versus the Historical School?” Journal of Economic Studies 32 (4): 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holý, Václav L. 1957. Über die Zeitgebundenheit der Kreislauftheorien von Quesnay, Marx und Keynes. Zürich: Polygraphischer Verlag A.G.Google Scholar
Korickij, E. B. 1997. Mir idej A. D. Bilimoviča [The world of ideas of A. D. Bilimovič], 2 Vols. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Korickij, E. and Šetov, V., A. D. Bilimovič. (http://gallery.economicus.ru/cgiise/gallery/frame_rightn.pl?type=ru&links=./ru/bilimovich/biogr/bilimovich_b1.txt&img=brief.gif&name=bilimovich).Google Scholar
Koropeckyj, I. S. 1984. “Academic Economics in the Nineteenth-Century Ukraine.” In Koropeckyj, I. S., ed., Selected Contributions of Ukrainian Scholars to Economics. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 163–222.Google Scholar
Koropeckyj, I. S. 1990. Development in the Shadow: Studies in Ukrainian Economics. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Koropeckyj, I. S. 1991. “The Contribution of Mykhailo Tuhan-Baranovsky to Monetary Economics.” History of Political Economy 23 (1): 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lossky, N. O. 1951. History of Russian Philosophy. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Rieter, Heinz von. 1983. “Zur Rezeption der physiokratischen Kreislaufanalogie in der Wirtschaftswissenschaft.” In Scherf, Harald, ed., Studien zur Entwicklung der ökonomischen Theorie III. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 55–99.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothschild, K. W. 2004. “The End of an Era: The Austrian Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie in the Interwar Period.” In Barens, I. et al. , eds., Political Events and Economic Ideas. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 247–260.Google Scholar
Screpanti, Ernesto and Zamagni, Stefano. 2005. An Outline of the History of Economic Thought, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seraphim, Hans-Jürgen. 1925. “Neuere russische Wert- und Kapitalzinstheorien.” Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschungen (Herausgegeben von der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Arbeitsgemeinschaft), Abteilung I, Heft 4. Berlin und Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Sheptun, Alla. 2005. “The German Historical School and Russian Economic Thought.” Journal of Economic Studies 32 (4): 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sombart, Werner. 1929. “Nationalökonomie: Ein Überblick.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 30 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Henry William. 1991. The Growth of Economic Thought, 3rd edition. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sušjan, Andrej. 2004. “Ljubljansko obdobje v življenju in delu ekonomista Aleksandra Bilimoviča [The Ljubljana period in the life and work of the economist Aleksander Bilimovič].” Kronika 52 (1): 55–72.Google Scholar
Sušjan, Andrej. 2005. “Nekatere značilnosti ekonomskega opusa Aleksandra Bilimoviča [Some characteristics of the economic works of Aleksander Bilimovič].” Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe 7 (sp. issue): 5–33.Google Scholar
Woog, Henri. 1950. The Tableau Economique of François Quesnay: An Essay in the Explanation of its Mechanism and a Critical Review of the Interpretations of Marx, Bilimovic and Oncken. Bern: A. Francke A. G. Verlag.Google Scholar
Zittel, Bernhard. 1979. “Die UNRRA-Universität in München 1945–1947.” Archivalische Zeitschrift (Böhlau Verlag, Köln, Wien) 75. Band: 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweynert, Joachim. 2002. Eine Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens in Ruβland 1805–1905. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Zweynert, Joachim. 2004. “The Theory of Internal Goods in the Nineteenth-century Russian Classical Economic Thought.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11 (4): 525–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar