Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:37:13.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: THE COASE THEOREM LESSONS FOR THE STUDY OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

STEVEN G. MEDEMA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Coase theorem has occupied a prominent place in economic discourse for the last half-century. The debate over the theorem and the uses to which it has been put are important moments in the history of modern economics, and the analysis of them by the historians of economics sheds light on certain of the tensions in contemporary historiography. This article discusses several aspects of the intellectual history of the Coase theorem, arguing that the study of this history illustrates the necessity of a pluralistic approach, and that attempts to write history from a singular historiographic perspective leave us with histories that are both misleading and incomplete.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baird, C. W. 1975. Prices and Markets: Microeconomics. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1968. “Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation and Liability Rules: A Comment.” Journal of Law and Economics 11: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Loic, and Giraud, Yann B. 2010. “Economics for the Masses: The Visual Display of Economic Knowledge in the United States (1921–1945).” Working Paper, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1594118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics 2 (October): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (October): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1972. “Industrial Organization: A Proposal for Research.” In Fuchs, V. R., ed., Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 59–73.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1981. “The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment.” Journal of Law and Economics 24 (April): 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1993. “Law and Economics at Chicago.” Journal of Law and Economics 36 (April): 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David C. 2004. “The Strange Persistence of the IS-LM Model.” History of Political Economy 36 (Supplement): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooter, Robert, and Ulen, Thomas. 1988. Law and Economics. Homewood, IL: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
“Editorial Addendum to ‘A Note on Rent and the Coase Theorem’ by David Shapiro.” 1977. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 221–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frech, H. E. III. 1979. “The Extended Coase Theorem and Long Run Equilibrium: The Nonequivalence of Liability Rules and Property Rights.” Economic Inquiry 17 (2): 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Yann. 2010. “The Changing Place of Visual Representation in Economics: Paul Samuelson Between Principle and Strategy, 1941–1955.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 32 (June): 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Elizabeth, and Spitzer, Matthew L. 1982. “The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests.” Journal of Law and Economics 25 (1): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W. 1983. “The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932–1970.” Journal of Law and Economics 26, 1(April): 163–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1982. The Applied Theory of Price. Second edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1994. Ronald H. Coase. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1999. “Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 15 (October): 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 2010. “A Case of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, “The Problem of Social Cost,” and the Coase Theorem.” European Journal of Law and Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G., and Samuels, Warren J. 1997. “Ronald Coase and Coasean Economics: Some Questions, Conjectures and Implications.” In Samuels, Warren J., Medema, Steven G., and Schmid, A. Allan, The Economy as a Process of Valuation. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 72–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G., and Zerbe, Richard O. Jr. 2000. “The Coase Theorem.” In Bouckaert, Boudewijn and Geest, Gerrit De, eds., The Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 836–892.Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. 1978. Intermediate Microeconomics: Theory, Issues, and Applications. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Polinsky, A. Mitchell 1974. “Economic Analysis as a Potentially Defective Product: A Buyer’s Guide to Posner’s Economic Analysis of Law.” Harvard Law Review 87: 1655–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, George L. 2010. “The Limits of Antitrust and the Chicago School Tradition.” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 6 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 1972. “The Problem of Social Cost Revisited.” Journal of Law and Economics 15: 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, Stewart J. 1988. “A Coasean Experiment on Contract Presumptions.” Journal of Legal Studies 17: 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, David L. 1974. “A Note on Rent and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Economic Theory 7 (1): 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, David L. 1978. “The Coase Theorem and Quasi Rents: Correcting the Record–Reply.” Public Finance Quarterly 6 (2): 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starrett, David A. 1972. “Fundamental Nonconvexities in the Theory of Externalities.” Journal of Economic Theory 4: 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1959. “The Politics of Political Economists.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 73 (November): 522–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price. Third edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1972. “The Law and Economics of Public Policy: A Plea to the Scholars.” Journal of Legal Studies 1 (January): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1987. The Theory of Price. Fourth edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vogel, Kenneth R. 1987. “The Coase Theorem and California Animal Trespass Law.” Journal of Legal Studies 167: 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O. Jr. 1980. “The Problem of Social Cost in Retrospect.” Research in Law and Economics 2: 83–102.Google Scholar