No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Herbert Spencer and the Political Economy of Mean-Spiritedness Revived
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2009
Extract
In recent years the reputation of Herbert Spencer (1820-1903) has undergone a transformation. Indeed, until the mid-1970s the answer to the rhetorical question, “Who reads Spencer now?” would surely have been “hardly anyone.” However, since then sociologist Jonathan Turner, intellectual historian Robert Bannister, political scientist Robert Perrin and dozens of economists and humanists have contributed to reconsideration of his role in nineteenth-century thought. They have also reinterpreted the corpus of his work and suggested new ways to utilize his contributions as a social theorist. Most important for our purposes is their effort to demonstrate that his stances on policy issues were not as mean-spirited as his critics have claimed. Indeed, Bannister, for example, forcefully argues that neither Spencer nor his American contemporary, William Graham Summer, were as consistently in favor of laissez faire or as harsh in their attitudes toward the underprivileged and the lower classes as scholarly convention once had it.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999
References
REFERENCES
Allet, John. 1987. “New Liberalism, Old Prejudices: J.A. Hobson and the ‘Jewish Question’.” Jewish Social Studies 49 (2): 99–114.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. 1970. “The Survival of the Fittest is our Doctrine: History or Histrionics?” Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (July-September): 377–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannister, Robert C. 1988. Social Darwinism: Science and Myth. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Beeghly, Leonard. 1983. “Spencer's Theory of Kinship Evolution and the Status of Women.” Sociological Perspectives 26 (July): 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, David. 1996. The Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer, Vol. II, reprint of 1908 ed. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Mark. 1978. “Herbert Spencer and the Myth of Laissez-Faire.” Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (April): 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grày, T.S. 1985. “Herbert Spencer Individualist or Organicist?” Political Studies 33 (June): 236–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, Valeric. 1988. “Is Spencer's Theory an Evolution Theory?” American Journal of Sociology 93 (March): 1200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiskes, Richard P. 1983. “Spencer and the Liberal Idea of Community.” Review of Politics 45 (October): 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, William. 1972. “Herbert Spencer's Theory of Welfare and Public Policy.” History of Political Economy 4 (Spring): 207–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pèel, J.D.Y. 1971. Herbert Spencer: The Evolution of a Sociologist. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Perrin, Robert G. 1983. Herbert Spencer: A Primary and Secondary Bibliography. New York: Garland Publishers.Google Scholar
Perrin, Robert G. 1976. “Herbert Spencer's Four Theories of Social Evolution.” American Journal of Sociology 81 (May): 1339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pheby, John. ed. 1994. J.A. Hobson After Fifty Years. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1972. An Imperial War and the British Working Class. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1904. Social Statics, abridged and revised; together with The Man Versus the State. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Letter and Enclosure, Spencer to John A. Hobson, 03 29, 1901, Archives, John A. Hobson Papers, Brynmor Jones Library. University of Hull, Hull, England.Google Scholar
Ta`lor, M.W. 1992. Men Versus the State: Herbert Spencer and Late Victorian Individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. 1985. Herbert Spencer: A Renewed Appreciation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, David. 1978. The Political and Social Thought of Herbert Spencer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar