Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-vfwnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T06:15:48.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium Methodology as Seen from a Hayekian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Hansjoerg Klausinger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ninetieth birthday of Friedrich August von Hayek provides a timely opportunity to reflect upon his contributions to economic thought, not just as a part of the history of ideas but rather as a challenge to today's modes of theorizing.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baird, C.W. 1987. “The Economics of Time and Uncertainty: A Review,” Review of Austrian Economics, 1, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, N.P. 1979. Hayek's Social and Economic Philosophy, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, S. 1989. “Hayek on Knowledge, Equilibrium and Prices,” in Friedrich August von Hayek zum 90. Geburtstag, Vienna: Wirtschafts-politische Blaetter.Google Scholar
Butos, W.N. 1985. “Hayek and General Equilibrium Analysis,” Southern Economic Journal, 52, 332–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B.J. 1988. “Hayek's Transformation,” History of Political Economy, 20, 513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, T. and Fink, R., 1985. “Inconsistent Equilibrium Constructs: the Evenly Rotating Economy of Mises and Rothbard,” American Economic Review, 75, 866–69.Google Scholar
Cowen, T. and Kroszner, R. 1987. “The Development of the New Monetary Economics,” Journal of Political Economy, 95, 567–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, M. and Steedman, I., 1989. Agonising over Equilibrium: Hayek and Lindahl, Paper delivered at the 3ème Colloque de l'Association Charles Gide in Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Desai, M. 1982. “The Task of Monetary Theory: the Hayek-Sraffa-Debate in a Modern Perspective,” in Baranzini, M. 1982. Ed. Advances in Economic Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frydman, R. 1983. “Individual Rationality, Decentralization, and the Rational Expectations Hypothesis,” in Frydman, R. and Phelps, E.S. 1983. Eds. Individual Forecasting and Aggregate Outcomes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garrison, R. W. 1985. “Intertemporal Coordination and the Invisible Hand: An Austrian Perspective on the Keynesian Vision,” History of Political Economy, 17, 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S. 1981. “The Political Economy of F.A. Hayek,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 14, 470–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F.H. 1973. “On Transactions Costs, Inessential Sequence Economies and Money,” Review of Economic Studies, 40, 449–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. 1982. “Monetary Trends in the United States and in the United Kingdom: A Review from the Perspective of New Developments in Monetary Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1552–56.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. 1928. “Das intertemporale Gleichgewichtssystem der Preisde und die Bewegungen des Geldwertes,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 28; as translated in Hayek, 1984, 71–117.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1931. Prices and Production, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1932. “Money and Capital: A Reply,” Economic Journal 42, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1933a. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1933b. “Ueber ‘neutrales Geld’” Zeitschrift fuer Nationaloekonomie 4; as translated in Hayek, 1984, 159–62.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1933c. Ed. Beitraege zur Geldtheorie, Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1935. “Preiserwartungen, monetäre Stoerungen und Fehlinvestitionen,” Nationaloekonomisk Tidsskrift, 73, as translated in Hayek, 1939, 135–56.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge,” Economica N.S., 4, as reprinted in Hayek, 1948a, 33–56.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1939. Profits, Interest and Investment, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, 35; as reprinted in Hayek, 1948a, 77–91.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A..1948a. Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1948b. “The Meaning of Competition,” in Hayek, 1948a, 92–106.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1969. “Three Elucidation of the ‘Ricardo Effect.’” Journal of Political Economy, 77; as reprinted in Hayek, 1978, 165–78.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1983. Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1976a. Denationalization of Money, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1976b. Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. London. Routlege and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A.. 1984. Money, Capital and Fluctutations, Early Essays, edited by McCloughry, R.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T.W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics, New York-London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1934. “The Determinateness of Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, 2; as reprinted in Kaldor, N. 1960, Essays on Value and Distribution, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I.. 1986a. Ed. Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on his Eightieth Birthday, New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, I.. 1986b. “Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich von Hayek: the Modern Extension of Austrian Subjectivism,” in Leser, N. 1986. Ed. Die Wiener Schule der Nationaloekonomie, Vienna: Boehlau.Google Scholar
Klausinger, H. 1989a. “On the History of Neutral Money,” in Walker, D. A. 1989. Ed. Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, vol. 2. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Klausinger, H.. 1989b. “Hayek and New Classical Economics on Equilibrium Analysis. Some Second Thoughts,” Jahrbuch fuer Sozialwissenschaft, 40, 171–86.Google Scholar
Koopmans, J. 1933, “Zum Problem des neutralen Geldes,” in Hayek, 1933c, 211–359Google Scholar
Lachmann, L.M. 1976. “From Mises to Shackle: an Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society,” Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 54–62.Google Scholar
Lachmann, L.M.. 1977. Capital, Expectations and the Market Process, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Lavoie, D. 1985. Rivalry and Central Planning, The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A. 1987. “Effective Demand Failures,” Swedish Journal of Economics, 75; reprinted in Leijonhufvud, 1981, 103–30.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, A.. 1981. Information and Coordination, Essays in Macroeconomic Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.E. 1980. “Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 12, 696–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R.E.. 1984. “Money in a Theory of Finance,” Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, 21, 9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menger, C. 1985 [1883]. Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, New York, London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Milgate, M. 1979. “On the Origin of the Notion of ‘Intertemporal Equilibrium.’” Economica, 46, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1939. Monetary Equilibrium, reprint, New York: Augustus Kelly 1965.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, G.P. 1986. “Money: Menger's Evolutionary Theory,” History of Political Economy, 18, 601–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Driscoll, G.P. and Rizzo, M.J.. 1985. The Economics of Time and Uncertainty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paque, K.H. 1985. “How Far Is Vienna from Chicago? An Essay on the Methodology of Two Schools of Dogmatic Liberalism,” Kyklos, 38, 412–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, M. 1989, “What Is Wrong with the New Institutional Economics (and What Is Still Wrong with the Old)?,” Review of Political Economy, 1, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearmur, J. 1986. “The Austrian Connection: Hayek's Liberalism and the Thought of Carl Menger,” in Grassl, W. and Smith, B.. Eds. 1986. Austrian Economics, Historical and Philosophical Background, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Steiger, O. 1987. “Lindahl, Eric Robert,” The New Palgrave; A Dictionary of Economics, 3, 194–98.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. 1986. “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: a Critical Examination of F.A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution,” Economics and Philosophy, 2, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V.. 1989. “Carl Menger's Evolutionary and John R. Commons' Collective Action Approach to Institutions: a Comparison,” Review of Political Economy, 1, 334–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, N. 1980. “The Overlapping Generations Model of Fiat Money,” in Kareken, J.J. and Wallace, N. 1980. Eds. Models of Monetary Economies, Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
E.R., Weintraub 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis, Studies in Appraisal, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar