Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:16:29.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emerging Learned Societies: Economic Ideas in Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

James P. Henderson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I found preparing this presidential address a much greater challenge than I had anticipated. After much deliberation, I decided to explore the historical roots of what we are doing now. The History of Economics Society, like other learned societies, holds an annual conference in different cities; members present papers which are discussed; and the Society sponsors a specialist journal—The Journal of the History of Economic Thought. Why? Where did this tradition begin? I turned to several historians of science—I. Bernard Cohen, Thomas S. Kuhn, Richard Yeo, and Ian Hacking—for some background.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Fall 1996 , pp. 186 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annals of the Royal Statistical Society, 1834–1934. 1934. The Royal Statistical Society, London.Google Scholar
Babbage, Charles. 1830. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and on some of its causes. reprint. Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1968. “The Origins and Early Development of the Royal Economic Society,” Economic Journal. 78, no. 310, June, 349–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1985. Revolution in Science, Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1987. “Scientific Revolutions, Revolutions in Science, and a Probabilistic Revolution, 1800–1930.” in The Probabilistic Revolution, 1, edited by Lorenz, Kruger, Daston, Lorraine J., and Michael, Heidelberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, 23–44.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1877. “Considerations adverse to the Maintenance of Section F (Economic Science and Statistics)…,” Journal of the (Royal) Statistical Society, 40, part 3, September, 468–73.Google Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. 1983. “The Origins of British ‘Social Science’: Political Economy, Natural Science and Statistics 1830–1835,” Historical Journal, 26, no. 3, 587–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, Lawrence. 1986. “The Social Science Association, 1857–1886: A Context for mid-Victorian Liberalism,” English Historical Review, January, 101, 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Lawrence. 1987. “A Peculiarity of the English? The Social Science Association and the Absence of Sociology in Nineteenth-Century Britain,” Past and Present, February, no. 114, 133–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, Peter. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall, 1842–1924, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1987. “Was there a Probabilistic Revolution 1800–1930?,” The Probabilistic Revolution, edited by Lorenz, Kruger, Daston, Lorraine J., and Michael, Heidelberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. 1830. A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Greene, London.Google Scholar
Jevons, H. A. 1883. In Methods of Social Reform and Other Papers. Macmillan, London, 179.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard. 1859. Literary Remains, Consisting of Lectures and Tracts on Political Economy of the Late Rev. Richard Jones, edited by William, Whewell, Murray, J., London; reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Journal of the (Royal) Statistical Society. Various issues.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science,” in The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 178–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lithographed Signatures of the Members of the British Association. 1833. Cambridge.Google Scholar
P., M. 1857. “The Birmingham Congress,” Fraser's Magazine, 56, November, no. 335, 619–26.Google Scholar
Morrell, Jack and Arnold, Thackray. 1981. Gentlemen of Science, Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Political Economy Club. Minutes of Proceedings, Roll of Members, and Questions Discussed, 4, 1882; 5, 1899; 6, 1921, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Report of the…Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Various issues.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Adam. 1833. Report of the Third Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, xxvii–xxxii.Google Scholar
Todhunter, Isaac. 1876. William Whewell, D. D. Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, An Account of His Writings, 2 vols.; reprint, Macmillan, London; reprint, Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science. Various issues.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1831. “Jones—on the Distribution of Wealth,” The British Critic, Quarterly Theological Review, and Ecclesiastical Record, 10, July 41–61.Google Scholar
Whewell, William. 1841. “Address,” Report of the Eleventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, xxvii–xxxv. Whewell Papers Collection. Trinity College Library, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard. 1981. “Scientific Method and the Image of Science, 1831–1890” The Parliament of Science: The British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1831–1981, edited by Roy, MacLeod and Peter, Collins, Science Reviews, Northwood.Google Scholar
Yeo, Richard. 1986. “Scientific Method and the Rhetoric of Science in Britain, 1830–1917,” The Politics and Rhetoric of Scientific Method: Historical Studies, edited by Schuster, John A. and Yeo, Richard R.., D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar