Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:17:36.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CONTRIBUTION OF ROBERT TORRENS TO RICARDO’S THEORY OF NATURAL WAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2018

Olivier Rosell
Olivier Rosell*
Affiliation:
University of Picardie.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the anteriority of Robert Torrens’s theory of natural wage to that of David Ricardo. Ricardo was influenced by Torrens’s thinking when writing the chapter on “Wages” of the Principles. For many historians of economic thought, this influence is limited to Torrens’s focus on the socio-cultural aspect of necessity goods, which determine the natural price of labor. While this interpretation is consistent with that of Ricardo, we argue that the anteriority of Torrens to Ricardo more generally focuses on the method used by the latter to justify the indexation of money wages on the money price of subsistence goods. Finally, this paper shows that the tribute paid to Torrens by Ricardo paradoxically explains posterity’s misunderstanding of his theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 201 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benetti, Carlo. 1998. “Robert Torrens.” In Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N., eds., The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics. Volume 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 468–474.Google Scholar
Benetti, Carlo, Bidard, Christian, and Klimovsky, Edith. 2008. “A Classical Model of Equilibrium and Disequilibrium. Bulletin of Political Economy 2 (1): 25–41.Google Scholar
Béraud, Alain. 1992. “Ricardo, Malthus, Say et les controverses de la seconde génération.” In Béraud, Alain and Faccarello, Gilbert, eds., Nouvelle Histoire de la Pensée Economique. Volume 1, Des scolastiques aux classiques. Paris: La découverte, pp. 365–508.Google Scholar
Bidard, Christian, and Klimovsky, Edith, with the collaboration of Carlo Benetti. 2006. Capital, salaire et crises : une approche classique. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Cannan, Edwin. 1903. A History of the Theories of Production and Distribution in English Political Economy from 1776 to 1848. London: P.S. King.Google Scholar
Cantillon, Richard. [1755] 1952. Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. Paris: Institut national d’études démographiques.Google Scholar
Caravale, Giovanni. A. 1985. “Diminishing Returns and Accumulation in Ricardo.” In Caravale, Giovanni A., ed., The Legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 127–188.Google Scholar
Caravale, Giovanni A., and Tosado, Domenico A.. 1980. Ricardo and the Theory of Value, Distribution and Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Casarosa, Carlo. 1978. “A New Formulation of the Ricardian System.” Oxford Economic Papers 30: 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casarosa, Carlo. 1985. “The ‘New View’ of the Ricardian Theory of Distribution and Economic Growth.” In Caravale, Giovanni A., ed., The Legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 45–58.Google Scholar
Corry, Bernard A. 1987. “Robert Torrens.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter K., eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Volume 1. London: Macmillan, pp. 659–660.Google Scholar
De Vivo, Giancarlo. 1987. “Ricardo, David.”In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter K., eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Volume 4. London: Macmillan, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
De Vivo, Giancarlo. 2000. “Introduction.” In De Vivo, Giancarlo, ed., Collected Works of Robert Torrens. Volume 2. Bristol: Thoemmes, pp. vii–xxx.Google Scholar
Depoortère, Christophe. 2008. “Quel modèle d’accumulation du capital chez Ricardo?” Cahiers d’économie politique 55: 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depoortère, Christophe. 2013. “William Nassau Senior and David Ricardo on the Method of Political Economy.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 35: 191–142.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1983. “The Classical Theory of Wages and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices.” American Economic Review 73 (2): 309–313.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1984. “Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx.” Oxford Economic Papers 36 (2): 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R., and Hollander, Samuel. 1977. “Mr. Ricardo and the Moderns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 91 (3): 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1983. “On the Interpretation of Ricardian Economics: The Assumption Regarding Wages.” American Economic Review 73 (May): 314–318.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1987. Classical Economics. Oxford: Basic Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. [1990] 1995. “Ricardian Growth Theory: A Resolution of Some Problems in Textual Interpretation.” In Hollander, Samuel, ed., Ricardo—The New View. London: Routledge, pp. 241–264.Google Scholar
Klimovsky, Edith. 1998. “Trabajo homogéneo y bienes-salario en la Teoría Ricardiana.” In Teoría, estructura y procesos económicos. Essayos en honor al Dr Julio H. G. Olivera. Centro de estudios avanzados de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires: Eudeba, pp. 109–125.Google Scholar
Levy, David. 1976. “Ricardo and the Iron Law: A Correction of the Record.” History of Political Economy 8 (2): 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1861–63] 1975. Theories of Surplus Value. Part II. French translation. Paris: Editions sociales.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [1867] 1906. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. London: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Passinettti, Luigi. 1960. “A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System.” The Review of Economic Studies 27 (2): 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peach, Terry. 1993. Interpreting Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1951–73. The Work and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Edited by Sraffa, Piero in collaboration with Dobb, Maurice H.. Eight volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1958. Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosell, Olivier. 2012. “Repartition du revenu et reproduction du capital : une approche classique.” Ph D thesis. Nanterre, Paris Ouest Nanterre University.Google Scholar
Rosell, Olivier. 2016. “Wages, Competition, and the Surplus of Labour: A Classical Contribution to Explaining Profit.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (1): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosselli, Annalissa. 1985. “The Theory of the Natural Wage.” In Caravale, Giovanni A., ed., The Legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 239–254.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Seligman, Edwin R. A. 1903. “On Some Neglected British Economists.” The Economic Journal 13 (51): 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1822. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Three volumes. London: G. Walkers et al.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1951. “Introduction.” The Work and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Edited by Piero Sraffa in collaboration with Dobb, Maurice H.. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–lxii.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, Georges J. 1952. “The Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution.” Journal of Political Economy 60 (3): 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrens, Robert. 1815. An Essay on the External Corn Trade; containing An Inquiry into the General Principles of that Important Branch of Traffic: an Examination of the Exceptions to which these Principles are liable and a Comparative Statement of the Effects which Restrictions on Importation and Free Intercourse, are respectively calculated to Produce Upon Subsistences, Agriculture, Commerce and Revenue. London: Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, Robert. 1820. An Essay on the Influence of the External Corn Trade upon the Production and Distribution of National Wealth. Second edition. London: Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, Robert. 1829. An Essay on the External Corn Trade with an Appendix on the Means of Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. A new edition. London: Longman et al.Google Scholar
Vidonne, Paul. 1986. La formation de la pensée économique. Paris: Economica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar