Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:50:52.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classical Economic Man: was he Interested in Keeping Up with the Joneses?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

William S. Kern
William S. Kern
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the significant contributions of the The Wealth of Nations was to bring to the consciousness of economists the centrality of the pursuit of self-interest in economic affairs. Following the publication of the The Wealth of Nations, economists increasingly assumed that the pursuit of self-interest was the prime psychological drive of mankind. As economics developed, modifications of the self-interest postulate occurred. Economists began to formally model the pursuit of self-interest and a specific form of the pursuit of self-interest ultimately came to dominate economists' thinking. Specifically, economists have taken a methodologically individualistic approach to this question. With rare exception, economists presume that the individual pursues self-interest more or less in “isolation.” As Frank Knight pointed out, the purely rational action of the economic man requires the complete absence of personal relations, in effect requiring persons to treat each other as vending machines (Knight 1960, p. 73). Robinson Crusoe alone on his island is thus the epitome of the economic man assumed by neoclassical economic theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 353 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, Syed. 1996. “On John Rae's Controversial Contributions to Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (Fall): 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1996. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Janet. 1998. “Mr. J. Stuart Mill, M.P., and the Character of the Working Classes.” In Eisenach, Eldon J., ed., Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22(2): 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzau, Arthur. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. Homewood, IL: Irwin Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert. 1985. Choosing the Right Pond. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert. 1999. Luxury Fever: Money and Happiness in an Era of Excess. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Furniss, Edgar. 1957. The Position of the Laborer in a System of Nationalism. New York: Kelley and Millman.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1759. The Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank. 1960. Intelligence and Democratic Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, 9th edition. London: Ballantyne Press, 1888.Google Scholar
Mason, R. 1998. The Economics of Conspicuous Consumption: Theory and Thought Since 1700. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
McCleary, G. F. 1953. The Malthusian Population Theory. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Google Scholar
McCullochJohn, R. John, R. 1864. The Principles of Political Economy, 5th edition. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Rae, John. 1834. Statement of Some New Principles of Political Economy. In R. Warren James, John Rae, Political Economist. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: J. M. Dent and Sons Ltd. 1973.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1836. An Outline of the Science of Political Economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Senior, Nassau. 1928. Industrial Efficiency and Social Economy. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. The Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library, 1937.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1987. The Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Whately, Richard. 1831. Introductory Lectures on Political Economy. London: B. Fellows.Google Scholar