Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:07:14.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Progressivism and Institutionalism: Albert Benedict Wolfe on Eugenics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2013

Luca Fiorito
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Albeit concerned with the biological element in social evolution, Albert B. Wolfe was among the very few economists of the progressive era who openly expressed their concerns about certain implications of eugenic rhetoric for the social science. Specifically, Wolfe questioned the strong hereditary boundaries that more extreme eugenicists suggested about human beings. A careful examination of Wolfe’s writings reveals that his reaction was rooted in the belief that many of the social problems that eugenicists attributed to hereditary limitations were actually imputable to the influence that the social, economic, and physical environment exercised on the individuals.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 449 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asso, Pier Francesco, and Fiorito, Luca. 2004. “Human Nature and Economic Institutions: Instinct Psychology, Behaviorism, and the Evolution of American Institutionalism.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (4): 445–477.Google Scholar
Ayres, Clarence E. 1944. The Theory of Economic Progress. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Carver, Thomas N. 1912. The Religion Worth Having. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cooke, Kathy J. 1998. “The Limits of Heredity: Nature and Nurture in American Eugenics before 1915.” Journal of the History of Biology 31 (2): 263–278.Google Scholar
Davenport, Charles B. 1911. Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Z. Clark. 1924. “Wolfe’s Conservatism, Radicalism, and Scientific Method.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38 (4): 682–686.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1959. The Economic Mind in American Civilization. Volumes 4 and 5. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
East, Edward M., and Jones, Donald F.. 1919. Inbreeding and Outbreeding; Their Genetic and Sociological Significance. Philadelphia, London: J.B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock. 1912. The Task of Social Hygiene. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Fiorito, Luca. 2009. “Frank Knight, Pragmatism and American Institutionalism: A Note.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16 (3): 475–487.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1904. “Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims.” American Journal of Sociology 10 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Goddard, Henry H. 1912. The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H. 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 9 (1): 309–318.Google Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E. 1982. “The Refractory Model: The Logistic Curve and the History of Population Ecology.” Quarterly Review of Biology 57 (1): 27–52.Google Scholar
Kingsland, Sharon E. 1995. Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. 1986. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “More Merciful and Not Less Effective: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 709–734.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2005a. “Mistaking Eugenics for Social Darwinism: Why Eugenics Is Missing from the History of American Economics.” History of Political Economy 37 (supplement): 200–233.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2005b. “Retrospectives: Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 207–224.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2009. “American Economic Reform in the Progressive Era: Its Foundational Beliefs and Their Relationship to Eugenics.” History of Political Economy 41 (1): 109–141.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. Forthcoming. “From the Progressives to the Institutionalists: What the First World War Did and Did Not Do to American Economics.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology.Google Scholar
Little, Michael A., and Garruto, Ralph M.. 2010. “Raymond Pearl and the Shaping of Human Biology.” Human Biology 82 (1): 77–102.Google Scholar
McDougall, William. 1924. “Review of Conservatism, Radicalism and Scientific Method: An Essay in Social Attitudes by A. B. Wolfe.” American Economic Review 14 (4): 714–718.Google Scholar
Mezzano, Michael. 2005. “The Progressive Origins of Eugenics Critics: Raymond Pearl, Herbert S. Jennings, and the Defense of Scientific Inquiry.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 4 (1): 83–97.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond. 1924. Studies in Human Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond. 1925. The Biology of Population Growth. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond. 1927. “The Biology of Superiority.” American Mercury 12 (November): 257–266.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond, and Reed, Lowell J.. 1920. “On the Rate of Growth of the Population of the United States since 1790 and its Mathematical Representation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 6 (6): 275–288.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond. 1923. “On the Mathematical Theory of Population Growth.” Metron 3 (1): 6–19.Google Scholar
Pearl, Raymond. 1924. “The Probable Error of Certain Constants of the Population Growth Curve.” American Journal of Hygiene 4 (3): 237–240.Google Scholar
Prasch, Robert. 1999. “American Economists in the Progressive Era on the Minimum Wage.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2): 221–230.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Edmund. 2002. “Carving Up Population Science: Eugenics, Demography, and the Controversy over the ‘Biological Law’ of Population Growth.” Social Studies of Science 32 (5/6): 857–899.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1991 The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1999. “Institutionalism as ‘Scientific’ Economics.” In Backhouse, Roger and Creedy, John, eds., From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D. P. O’Brien. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 223–242.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 2005. “Comments on Four Papers on Economics and Human Heterogeneity.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64 (3): 881–886.Google Scholar
Saleeby, Caleb W. 1909. Parenthood and Race Culture: An Outline of Eugenics. London: Cassell and Co.Google Scholar
Seager, Henry R. 1913. “The Minimum Wage as Part of a Program for Social Reform.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 48 (July): 3–12.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soloway, Richard A. 1995. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1898. “The Instinct of Workmanship and the Irksomeness of Labor.” American Journal of Sociology 4 (2): 187–201.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein B. 1914. The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Webb, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice. 1897. Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans Green, 1920.Google Scholar
Watson, John B. 1913. “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It.” Psychological Review 20 (2): 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, John B. 1925. Behaviorism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1906. The Lodging House Problem in Boston. New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1910. “Review of Responsibility for Crime: An Investigation of the Causes of Crime and a Means of its Prevention by Philip A. Parsons.” Journal of Political Economy 18 (2): 147–149.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1911a. “Review of Parenthood and Race Culture by C.W. Saleeby.” American Journal of Sociology 17 (1): 131–133.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1912. “Review of The Religion Worth Having by Thomas Nixon Carver.” American Economic Review 2 (3): 679–681.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1913a. “Review of The Task of Social Hygiene by Havelock Ellis.” American Journal of Sociology 19 (3): 395–398.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1913b. “Review of Problems in Eugenics; Heredity and Eugenics by W. E. Castle, J. M. Coulter, C. B. Davenport, E. M. East, W. L. Tower; Heredity in Relation to Eugenics by Charles B. Davenport; The Social Direction of Human Evolution by William E. Kellicott; The Kallikak Family by H. H. Goddard; Race Improvement or Eugenics by La Reine Helen Baker; The Task of Social Hygiene by Havelock Ellis.” American Economic Review 3 (1): 165–170.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B, ed. 1916. Readings in Social Problems. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1917. “Some Phases of the Minimum Wage: Discussion.” American Economic Review 7 (1): 275–281.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1919. “Some Psychological Aspects of Industrial Reconstruction.” Publication of the American Sociological Society XIV: 64–78.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1921a. “Review of Immigration and Americanization by Philip Davis.” American Economic Review 11 (1): 130–132.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1921b. “The Motivation of Radicalism.” Psychological Review 28 (4): 280–300.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1922a. “Emotion, Blame, and the Scientific Attitude in Relation to Radical Leadership and Method.” International Journal of Ethics 32 (2): 142–159.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1922b. “Some Sources of Sentiments Against Birth Control.” In Birth Control, What it Is, How it Works, What it Will Do, Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference, New York, 11, 12 November 1921. New York: Graphic Press, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1923a. “Individualism and Democracy.” International Journal of Ethics 33 (4): 398–415.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1923b. “The Role of Sympathy and Ethical Motivation in Scientific Social Research.” Journal of Philosophy (20) 9: 225–234.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1923c. Conservatism, Radicalism, and Scientific Method: An Essay on Social Attitudes. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1923d. “Eugenics and Social Attitudes.” In Davenport, Charles B., ed., Eugenics in Race and State. Scientific Papers of the Second International Congress of Eugenics. Held at American Museum of Natural History, New York, 22–28 September 1921. Volume 2. Baltimore: Williams & Williams, pp. 413–418.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1924a. “Functional Economics.” In Tugwell, Rexford G., ed., The Trend of Economics. New York: Alfred Knopf, pp. 443–482.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1924b. “Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 13 (1): 142–145.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1925. “Review of Studies in Human Biology by Raymond Pearl.” American Economic Review 15 (3): 542–545.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1926. “Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 16 (1): 246–247.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1927a. “Review of The Biology of Population Growth by Raymond Pearl.” American Economic Review 17 (2): 347–350.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1927b. “Is There a Biological Law of Human Population Growth?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 41 (4): 557–594.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1928. “The Population Problem Since the World War: A Survey of Literature and Research.” Journal of Political Economy 36 (5): 529–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1928b. “The Population Problem Since the World War: A Survey of Literature and Research (Continued).” Journal of Political Economy 36 (6): 662–685.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1929. “The Population Problem Since the World War: A Survey of Literature and Research (Concluded).” Journal of Political Economy 37 (1): 87–120.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1946. “Review of The Theory of Economic Progress by Clarence E. Ayres.” Political Science Quarterly 59 (4): 622–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Albert B. 1946. “Discussion.” American Economic Review 36 (2): 848–852.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1925. “The Trend of Economics, as Seen by Some American Economists.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 39 (2): 155–183.Google Scholar