Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:28:52.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Begriffsgeschichte: between the Scylla of Conceptual and the Charybdis of Institutional History of Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Matthias Klaes
Matthias Klaes
Affiliation:
Department of Management, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BGUK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to a commonly held view, doctrinal history formed a largely uncontested part of the discipline of economics in the early years of the twentieth century. Economists like Edwin Cannan, Jacob Viner, and Joseph A. Schumpeter were at the same time respected economists and historians of economics. Contemporary historians of economics, on the other hand, tend to feel defensive about their field of study. The questions of why, how, and in which discipline one should pursue the history of economics is hotly debated among practitioners, while the number of universities and curricula still offering history courses is in steady decline. This is matched by a corresponding attitude among orthodox economists aptly summarized by Frank H. Hahn (1992, p. 165): “What the dead had to say, when of value, has long since been absorbed, and when we need to say it again we can generally say it much better.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 153 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Douglas W. 1991. “What Are Transaction Costs?” Research in Law and Economics 14: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen A. and Allen, William R.. 1972. University Economics, 3rd edition. London and Belmont, CA: Prentice-Hall and Wadsworth UK.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude E. M. 1976. “The Question of Linguistic Idealism.” In Anscombe, G. E. M., ed., Collected Papers, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 1995. Interpreting Macroeconomics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry. 1983. “Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction.” Sociology 17 (11): 524–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Barry, Bloor, David, and Henry, John. 1996. Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Birken, Lawrence. 1988. “From Macroeconomics to Microeconomics The Marginalist Revolution in Sociocultural Perspective.” History of Political Economy 20 (Summer): 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birken, Lawrence. 1994. “Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Reply to J. M. Lipkis.” History of Political Economy 26 (Fall): 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. D. Collison. 1960. Economic Thought and the Irish Question, 1817–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1983. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David. 1996. “The Question of Linguistic Idealism Revisited.” In Sluga, Hans and Stern, David G., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein: Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brewer, Anthony. 1996. “[Reply to Henderson]” History of Economics Society Discussion List Archive, 11 November: www.eh.net/Archives/hes/nov-1996/0026.html.Google Scholar
Brugger, Walter. 1976. “Modalität.” In Brugger, W, ed., Philosophisches Wörterbuch. Freiburg: Herder, 18th ed. 1990.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1951. “Inconsistency and Indeterminacy in Classical Economics.” Econometrica 19 (04): 152–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto. 1939. Land und Herrschaft, 5th edition. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1965.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. 1952. “Die alt-europäische ‘Ökonomik’.” In Brunner, O., ed., Neue Wege der Sozialgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1956.Google Scholar
Casson, Mark. 1991. The Economics of Business Culture: Game Theory, Transaction Costs, and Economic Performance. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven N S. 1974. “A Theory of Price Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 17 (04): 53–71.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica N.S. 4 (11): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. and North, Douglass C.. 1998. “Invitation to Join ISNIE.” Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics 1 (Spring): 4.Google Scholar
Dahlman, Carl J. 1979. “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics 22 (10): 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, L. E. 1986. “Comment.” In Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, Kenneth G. 1977. “Competition” in the History of Economic Thought. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. 1996. The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cos t Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method, 8th edition, translated by Solovay, S. A. and Mueller, J. H., edited by Catlin, G. E. G.. New York and London: Free Press and Collier-Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr. and Hébert, Robert F.. 1985. “Consumer Surplus: The First Hundred Years.” History of Political Economy 17 (Fall): 419–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmett, Ross. 1997. “Reflections on ‘Breaking Away’: Economics as Science and the History of Economics as History of Science.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 15: 221–36.Google Scholar
Furubotn, Eirik G and Pejovich, Svetozar. 1974. The Economics of Property Rights. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1992. “Autobiographical Notes with Reflections.” In Szenberg, Michael ed., Eminent Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 1997. “Conjectures and Reputations: The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and the History of Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy 29 (Winter): 695–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, James P. 1996. “Whig History of Economics is Dead—Now What?” History of Economics Society Discussion List Archive, Editorial (November): www.eh.net/HE/hes—list/Editorials/henderson.php.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1935. “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money.” Economica N.S. 2 (02): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1993. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back Into Economics. Cambridge: Polity, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminsky, Howard and Melton, James Van Horn. 1992. “Translators' Introduction.” In Otto Brunner, Land and Lordship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 1998. The Emergence of Transaction Costs in Economics: A Conceptual History. Ph.D. Thesis Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 1999. “The Diffusion of ‘The Nature of the Firm’: A Sociology of Error?” EIPE Seminar in Philosophy and Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 27 10 1999.Google Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 2000a. “The History of the Concept of Transaction Costs: Neglected Aspects.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (06): 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 2000b. “The Birth of the Concept of Transaction Costs: Issues and Controversies.” Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (12): 567–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 2002. Transaction Costs: A Conceptual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1972a. “Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte.” In Koselleck, R., ed., Vergangene Zukunft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1979.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1972b. “Begriffsgeschichte and Social History.” In Koselleck, R., ed., Futures Past, 1979, translated by Tribe, Keith. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Futures Past, translated by Tribe, Keith. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 1996. “Sociophilosophy and the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 61: 83–97.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1971. “History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions.” In Buck, R. C. and Cohen, R. S., eds, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Laurence, Stephen and Margolis, Eric 1999. “Concepts and Cognitive Science.” In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., eds, Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lipkis, Jeff M. 1993. “Historians and the History of Economic Thought: A Response to Lawrence Birken.” History of Political Economy 25 (Spring): 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat Than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, ed. 1994. Natural Images in Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2001. Machine Dreams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehans, Jürg 1987. “Transaction Costs.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave, vol. 4. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1981. Zur Genealogie der Moral. In Schlechta, Karl, ed., Friedrich Nietzsche: Werke in Drei Bänden, vol. 2. München: Hanser.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 1985. “Politik als Handlungsbegriff. Horizontwandel des Politikbegriffs in Deutschland 1890–1933.” Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium 28, Helsinki: Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 1989. “Die Thematisierung der Politik als Phänomen. Eine Interpretation der Geschichte des Begriffs Politik im Frankreich des 20. Jahrhunderts.” Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium 38. Helsinki: Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 1992. “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science.” History of Political Economy 24 (Spring): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 1999a. “Military/Artificial Intelligence: Military Science Policy and Herbert A. Simon,” paper presented at the EIPE Workshop Economists at War, 04 21, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 1999b. “Institutional History of Economics.” EAEPE Newsletter 21 (01): 8.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1980. “Social Uses of Science.” In Rousseau, George S. and Porter, Roy, eds., The Ferment of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1992. “Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate.” History of Science 30 (12): 333–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Harold T. 1971. “The Efficacy of Monetary and Fiscal Policies [Comment].” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 3 (05): 550–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stierle, Karheinz. 1979. “Historische Semantik und die Geschichtlichkeit der Bedeutung.” In Koselleck, Reinhart, ed., Historische Semantik und Begriffsgeschichte. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1950a. “The Development of Utility Theory I.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (08): 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1950b. “The Development of Utility Theory II.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (10): 373–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1978. Land, Labour and Economic Discourse. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1985. “Translator's Introduction.” In Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, translated by Tribe, KeithCambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1979. “Transaction-Cost Economics The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22 (10): 233–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1969. Economics and Policy: A Historical Study. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar