Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:00:56.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE BEGINNINGS OF A ‘COMMON-SENSE’ APPROACH TO PORTFOLIO THEORY BY NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH FINANCIAL ANALYSTS PAUL LEROY-BEAULIEU AND ALFRED NEYMARCK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Cécile Edlinger  and
Antoine Parent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is an addition to the revisited history of financial economics. While Markowitz (1952, 1959), Roy (1952), and Tobin (1958) are recognized as the founding fathers of Modern Portfolio Theory, we recall that its origins should be traced prior to 1914. We consider two, turn-of-the-century, French, financial analysts and suggest that notions such as risk aversion and risk premium, international diversification and correlation, specific and systematic risks and arbitrage were common sense for Leroy-Beaulieu (1906) and Neymarck (1913). The contribution of these authors to the development of Modern Portfolio Theory—long before the 1950s—should not be underestimated.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 23 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arbulu, Pedro. 1998. “La Bourse de Paris au 19e siècle: l’exemple d’un marché émergent devenu efficient.” Revue d’économie financière 49 (5): 213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbulu, Pedro. 2007. “Le marché parisien des actions au 19e siècle.” In Gallais-Hamono, Georges, ed., Le marché financier français au 19e siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de la Sorbonne, vol. 2: pp. 365–458.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Arzac, Enrique R. and Bawa, Vijay S.. 1977. “Portfolio Choice and Equilibrium in Capital Markets with Safety-First Investors.” Journal of Financial Economics 4: 277–288.Google Scholar
Bachelier, Louis. 1900. “Théorie de la spéculation.” Annales Scientifiques de l’E.N.S. 3 (17): 21–86.Google Scholar
Bachelier, Louis. 1912. Calcul des probabilités. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Peter L. 1992. Capital Ideas. The Improbable Origins of Modern Wall Street. New York: The Free Press (Macmillan).Google Scholar
Black, Fischer. 1972. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” The Journal of Business 45 (3): 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. “La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progrès de la raison.” Sociologie et sociétés 7 (1): 91–118.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves. 1992. “L’économie politique et les mathématiques en France 1800-1940.” Histoire et mesure 7 (1–2): 25–52.Google Scholar
Breton, Yves, and Lutfalla, Michel. 1991. L’économie politique en France au XIXe siècle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Broihanne, Marie-Hélène, Merli, Maxime, and Roger, Patrick. 2004. Finance Comportementale. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Cavelier, Marcel. [1924] 1934. La gestion des fortunes mobilières. Paris: Librairie Delagrave.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W. 2007. “Irving Fisher and His Students as Financial Economists.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Twentieth-Century Contributions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 45–59.Google Scholar
Dimand, Robert W., and Ben-El-Mechaiekh, Hichem. 2006. “Louis Bachelier.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 225–237.Google Scholar
Donner, Otto. 1941. La science de la Bourse: les facteurs de la formation des cours. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Edlinger, Cécile, Merli, Maxime, and Parent, Antoine. 2011. “La diversification des portefeuilles français à la veille de 1914 ou l’image écornée du rentier français du 19e siècle.” Revue d’Economie Politique 121 (6): 915–934.Google Scholar
Edlinger, CécileMaxime, MerliAntoine, Parent. 2013. “An Optimal World Portfolio on the Eve of World War One: Was There a Bias to Investing in the New World Rather than in Europe?” The Journal of Economic History 73 (2): 500–532.Google Scholar
Fowler, John F. 1928. American Investment Trust. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, William N. and Ukhov, Andrey D.. 2006. “British Investment Overseas 1870–1913: A Modern Portfolio Theory Approach.” Review of Finance, Oxford University Press for European Finance Association 10 (2): 261–300.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1935. “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money.” Economica, New series 2 (5): 1–19.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1962. “Liquidity.” The Economic Journal 72 (288): 787–802Google Scholar
Hutson, Elaine. 2005. “The Early Managed Fund Industry: Investment Trusts in Nineteenth Century Britain.” International Review of Financial Analysis 14: 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2004. “Eléments biographiques inédits sur Jules Regnault (1834–1894), inventeur du modèle de marche aléatoire pour représenter les variations boursières.” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 11 (2): 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2006a. “Economic Instruments and Theory in the Construction of Henri Lefèvre’s ‘Science of the Stock Market.’” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 169–190.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2006b. “A Nineteenth-Century Random Walk Hypothesis: Jules Regnault and the Origins of Scientific Financial Economics.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2006c. “Was There a ‘ Vernacular ‘Science of Financial Markets’ in France during the Nineteenth Century? A Comment on Preda’s ‘Informative Prices, Rational Investors’.” History of Political Economy 38 (3): 531–545.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2007. “The Role of the CAPM, the Modigliani-Miller Theorems and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis in the Rise of a Scientific Discipline.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Twentieth-Century Contributions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. 2008. “The Construction of the Canonical History of Financial Economics.” History of Political Economy 40 (2): 213–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck. “Bachelier: Not the Forgotten Forerunner He Has Been Depicted As. An Analysis of the Dissemination of Louis Bachelier’s Work in Economics.” European Journal of Economic Thought 19 (3): 431–451.Google Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck, and Gall, Philippe Le. 2001. “Does God practice a random walk? The ‘financial physics’ of a nineteenth-century forerunner, Jules Regnault.” European Journal History of Economic Thought 8 (3): 332–362.Google Scholar
Knoll, Michael S. 2008. “The Ancient Roots of Modern Financial Innovation: The Early History of Regulatory Arbitrage.” Oregon Law Review 87: 93–116.Google Scholar
Leavens, Dickson H. 1945. “Diversification of Investments.” Trusts and Estates 80 (5): 469–473.Google Scholar
Leroy-Beaulieu, Paul. 1906. L’art de placer et gérer sa fortune. Paris: Librairie Ch. Delagrave.Google Scholar
Lintner, John. 1965. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 47 (1): 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, John. 1969. “The Aggregation of Investor’s Diverse Judgments and Preferences in Purely Competitive Security Markets.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 4 (4): 347–400.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, Henry. 1907. Investment, An Exact Science. London: The Financial Review of Reviews.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” The Journal of Finance 7 (1): 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. [1987] 2000. Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 1999. “The Early History of Portfolio Theory: 1600–1960.” Financial Analysts Journal 55 (4): 5–16.Google Scholar
Markowitz, Harry M. 2002. “Efficient Portfolios, Sparse Matrices, and Entities: A Retrospective.” Operations Research 50 (1): 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschak, Jacob. 1938. “Money and the Theory of Assets.” Econometrica 6 (4): 311–325.Google Scholar
Ménard, Claude. 1978. La Formation d’une Rationalité Economique: A. A. Cournot. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Mossin, Jan. 1966. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica 34 (4): 768–783.Google Scholar
Neymarck, Alfred. 1913. Que doit-on faire de son argent ? Paris: Marchal et Godde.Google Scholar
Preda, Alex. 2004. “Informative Prices, Rational Investors: The Emergence of the Random Walk Hypothesis and the Nineteenth-Century ‘Science of Financial Investments.” History of Political Economy 36 (2): 351–386.Google Scholar
Preda, Alex. 2006a. “Rational Investors, Informative Prices: The Emergence of the ‘Science of Financial Investments’ and the Random Walk Hypothesis.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 149–168.Google Scholar
Preda, Alex. 2006b. “Tracing the Boundaries between Vernacular Science and Academic Theories: A Reply to Franck Jovanovic.” History of Political Economy 38 (3): 547–554.Google Scholar
Pratt, John W. 1964. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica 32 (1/2): 122–136.Google Scholar
Quittard-Pinon, François. 2003. Marchés des Capitaux et Théorie Financière. Third Edition. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Régnault, Jules. 1863. Calcul des chances et philosophie de la Bourse. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier, Castel.Google Scholar
Roy, Arthur D. 1952. “Safety First and the Holding of Assets.” Econometrica 20 (3): 431–449.Google Scholar
Scratchley, Arthur. 1875. On Average Investment Trusts. London: Shaw and Son.Google Scholar
Sharpe, William F. 1963. “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science 9: 277–293.Google Scholar
Sharpe, William F. 1964. “A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” The Journal of Finance 19 (3): 425–442.Google Scholar
Solnik, Bruno H. 1974. “Why Not Diversify Internationally Rather than Domestically?” Financial Analyst Journal (July–August): 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taqqu, Murad S. 2001. “Bachelier and His Times: A Conversation with Bernard Bru.” Finance and Stochastics 5: 3–32.Google Scholar
Telser, Lester G. 1955. “Safety First and Hedging.” Review of Economic Studies 23 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1958. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies 25 (1): 65–86.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, John Burr. [1938] 1964. The Theory of Investment Value. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Heinz, and Hafner, Wolfgang. 2006. “Vincenz Bronzin’s Option Pricing Theory: Contents, Contribution and Background.” In Poitras, Geoffrey, ed., Pioneers of Financial Economics, Contributions Prior to Irving Fisher. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 238–264.Google Scholar