Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:07:18.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AN ECONOMIC APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF LAW IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY: GAETANO FILANGIERI AND LA SCIENZA DELLA LEGISLAZIONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

Abstract

This work presents the elements of economic analysis of law that occur in the thought of Gaetano Filangieri. In the pages of La Scienza della Legislazione the Neapolitan writer develops a utilitarian and economic investigation that pays attention to the judgments individuals make over social phenomena at the margin point. A proof of this development can be found in the explanation of the principle of decreasing marginal utility, argued in Head XXXI of Book III, which represents one of the most effective demonstrations that can be found before the end of nineteenth-century literature. The most remarkable fact is that, of all the five parts that compose the Filangierian work, the most rich in economic arguments is dedicated to “Criminal Laws.”

This article will point out this and other innovative results of the Filangerian analysis, and will also offer a reconstruction of the economic theory on crime and punishment presented in La Scienza della Legislazione. Filangieri’s criminal doctrine represents a significant example of the Enlightenment antecedents of “law and economics,” as well as the better known contributions made by Beccaria and Bentham.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonesana di, Beccaria, Cesare, . 1764. Dei delitti e delle pene. Lucca.Google Scholar
Becker, Garry. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” The Journal of Political Economy 76: 169217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanna, Adriano. 2005. Storia del diritto moderno in Europa. Le fonti e il pensiero giuridico II. Milano: Giuffrè editore.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Lucio. 1991. Gaetano Filangieri e l’Illuminismo europeo. Napoli: Guida.Google Scholar
Fassò, Guido. 2008. Storia della filosofia del diritto. Vol. II. L’età moderna. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Faucci, Riccardo. 2000. L’economia politica in Italia. Dal Cinquecento ai nostri giorni. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Francesco. 1955. Trattati italiani del XVIII secolo. Prefazione al vol. III della prima serie della Biblioteca dell’economista, in Opere Complete, vol. II. Roma: Bancaria editrice.Google Scholar
Ferrone, Vincenzo. 2003. La Società giusta ed equa. Repubblicanesimo e diritti dell’uomo in Gaetano Filangieri. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Filangieri, Gaetano. 1780–85. La scienza della legislazione, ed. Ferrone, Vincenzo. Venezia: Centro di studi sull’Illuminismo europeo, 2003.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Friedman, David D. 2000. Law’s Order. What Economy Has to do with Law and Why it Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, David D. and Sjostrom, William. 1993. “Hanged for a Sheep: The Economics of Marginal Deterrence.” The Journal of Legal Studies XXII (2): 345366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frigo, Daniela. 1990. “Principe, giudici, giustizia: mutamenti dottrinali e vicende istituzionali fra Sei e Settecento.” In Berlinguer, Luigi and Colao, Floriana, eds., Illuminismo e dottrine penali. Milano: Giuffrè editore: 338.Google Scholar
Pecora, Gaetano. 2007. Il pensiero politico di Gaetano Filangieri. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1985. “An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law.” Columbia Law Review 85: 11931231.Google Scholar
Romagnosi, Giandomenico. 1791. Genesi del diritto penale. Pavia.Google Scholar
Shavell, Steven M. 1985. “Criminal Law and the Optimal Use of Non-monetary Sanctions as a Deterrent.” Columbia Law Review 85: 12321262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven M. 1992. “A Note on Marginal Deterrence.” International Review of Law and Economics 12: 345355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven M. 2003. Economic Analysis of Public Law Enforcement and Criminal Law. Cambridge: Harvard Law School.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven M., and Polinsky, Mitchell. 1999. The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, Maria T. 2006. “Free Trade, Feudal Remnants and International Equilibrium in Gaetano Filangieri’s Science of Legislation.” History of European Ideas 32: 502524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Fabrizio. 2007. “Diritti umani, repubblicanesimo dei moderni ed equità sociale: le nuove categorie della storiografia su Gaetano Filangieri.” Storia del pensiero economico IV (1): 141154.Google Scholar
Simon, Fabrizio. 2009a. “Il marginalismo giuridico di Gaetano Filangieri.” Studi e Note di Economia XIV (2): 4566.Google Scholar
Simon, Fabrizio. 2009b. “Criminology and Economic Ideas in the Age of Enlightenment.” History of Economic Ideas XVII (3): 1138.Google Scholar
Simon, Fabrizio. 2009c. “The Role of Punishment in the Works of Adam Smith.” Storia e Politica I (2): 303330.Google Scholar
Stigler, Georg. 1970. “The Optimum Enforcement of Laws.” Journal of Political Economy 78(3): 526536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trampus, Antonio, ed. 2005. Diritti e costituzione. L’opera di Gaetano Filangieri e la sua fortuna europea. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Trampus, Antonio. 2008. Il diritto alla felicità. Storia di un’idea. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Venturi, Franco. 1969. Settecento riformatore. Da Muratori a Beccaria. Einaudi: Torino.Google Scholar