Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:35:30.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ADAM SMITH’S LAST TEACHINGS: DIALECTICAL WISDOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2016

Lorenzo Garbo
Lorenzo Garbo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Redlands, Redlands (CA), [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the teachings and admonitions regarding wisdom found in the sixth edition of Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments (TMS). Following a mind-path marked by the seminal contributions of Glenn Morrow (1923), Donald Winch (1978), and Laurence Dickey (1986), the paper offers an interpretation of the higher moral standard (superior prudence) introduced by Smith in the last edition of TMS, as his response to the socio-economic and cultural changes that took place in Great Britain in the second half of the eighteenth century. Between the first and last editions of TMS the taste for luxury and conspicuous consumption became widespread and contagious both geographically and across ranks. Prudence and other-approbation, sufficient gatekeepers of moral conduct and character in the previous editions of TMS, became progressively less effective in keeping society away from moral deception and in regulating reputation and the distinction of ranks. The paper examines the introduction of superior prudence in the last edition of TMS as Smith’s vision of a dialectical process between external and internal approbation that is capable of transforming individual dependence on social praise into a dialogue between materialistic and moral concerns, which would lead to a progressively wiser, although conflictual, existence.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 41 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvey, James E. 2007. “The ‘New View’ of Adam Smith and the Development of His Views over Time.” In Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, J., eds., New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments.’ Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 66–83.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce. 1976. “Ideology and Theory: The Tension between Political and Economic Liberalism in Seventeenth century England.” The American Historical Review 81, 3 (June): pp. 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, Walter. 1968. “Adam Smith as a Person.” In St John-Stevas, Norman, ed., The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Volume III. London: The Economist, pp. 85–112.Google Scholar
Campbell, Roy H., and Skinner, Andrew S., 1982. Adam Smith, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1976. “Adam Smith’s View of Man.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (3): pp. 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbett, William. [1830] 1983. Rural Rides. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, John, eds. 2007. New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments.’ Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. [1826] 1972. On the Constitution of Church and State. In The Collected Works of S. T. Coleridge. Bollingen Series LXXV.5. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefano, Whatmore, Richard, and Young, Brian, eds. 2000. Economy, Polity, and Society. British Intellectual History 1750–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropsey, Joseph. 1957. Polity and Political Economy: An Interpretation of the Principles of Adam Smith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Uyl, Douglas J., and Griwsold, Charles L.. 1996. “Adam Smith on Friendship and Love.” Review of Metaphysics 49: 609–637.Google Scholar
Dickey, Laurence. 1986. “Historicizing the ‘Adam Smith Problem’: Conceptual, Historiographical, and Textual Issues.” Journal of Modern History 58: 579–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, William, and Wilson, David. 2010. “Thomas Chalmers: The Market, Moral Conduct, and Social Order.” History of Political Economy 42 (4): 723–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, William, and Wilson, David. 2013. “The Emergence of Modern Agency Considered in Relation to the Parts of the Internal and External in the Formation of Order.” Paper presented at ESHET 2013, Kingston Business School, Kingston-upon-Thames, UK.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1983. “From Applied Theology to Social Analysis: The Break between John Locke and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, John. 1987. Virtuous Discourse Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 1987. “The Two Voices of Adam Smith: Moral Philosopher and Social Critic.” History of Political Economy 19 (3): 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 1989. “The Evolution of Adam Smith’s View on Political Economy.” History of Political Economy 21 (1): 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, Ann. 2007. “Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy as Ethical Self-formation.” In Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, John, eds., New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments.’ Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 106–123.Google Scholar
Garbo, Lorenzo. 2012. “Early Evolution of the Assumption of Non-Satiation.” Review of Political Economy 24 (1): 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboy, Elizabeth W. 1934. Wages in Eighteenth-century England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. 1976. “Public Virtue and Private Virtues.” Eighteenth Century Studies 9: 477–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grampp, William D. 1948. “Adam Smith and the Economic Man.” Journal of Political Economy 56 (4): 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Henry. 1963. An Economic History of Scotland in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2009. Adam Smith and the Character of Virtue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert L. 1982. “The Socialization of the Individual in Adam Smith.” History of Political Economy 14 (3): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Fred. 1978. Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. [1977] 1999. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 1983. “The ‘Rich-Poor Country’ Debate in Scottish Classical Political Economy.” In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael, eds. 1983a. Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael . 1983b. “Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nations: An Introductory Essay.” In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 1983. “John Millar and Individualism.” In Hont, Istvan, and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Peter, and Skinner, Andrew S., eds. 1992. Adam Smith Reviewed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Knights, Ben. 1978. The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, David M. 1995. “The Partial Spectator in the Wealth of Nations: A Robust Utilitarianism.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 2 (2): 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfie, Alec L. 1967. The Individual in Society: Papers on Adam Smith. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre. 2008. “Adam Smith, the Last of the Former Virtue Ethicists.” History of Political Economy 40 (1): 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, Neil. 1982. “The Consumer Revolution of Eighteenth-century England.” In McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, John Harold, The Birth of a Consumer Society. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, ch. 1, pp. 9–33.Google Scholar
McPherson, Michael S. 1982. “Mill’s Moral Theory and the Problem of Preference Change.” Ethics 92: 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, John. [1803] 2006. “The Effects of Commerce and Manufactures and of Opulence and Civilisation upon the Morals of a People.” In Salber Philips, M. and Smith, D. R., eds., An Historical View of the English Government. The Online Library of Liberty, Volume III, book II, chapter VI. http://oll.libertyfund.org. Accessed 05 October 2015.Google Scholar
Montes, Leonidas. 2004. Adam Smith in Context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1923. The Ethical and Economic Theories of Adam Smith. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Neale, Ronald Stanley. 1981. Bath 1680–1850. A Social History or A Valley of Pleasure yet a Sink of Iniquity. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Oncken, August. 1897. “The Consistency of Adam Smith.” The Economic Journal 7, 27 (September): 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otteson, James. 2002. Adam Smith’s Marketplace in Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2008. “Th Adam Smith Problem in Reverse: Self-Interest in The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” History of Political Economy 40 (2): 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paganelli, Maria Pia. 2011. “Theory of Moral Sentiments 1759 vs Theory of Moral Sentiments 1790: A Change of Mind or a Change in Constraint?” Studi e Note di Economia XVI (2): 123–132.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas. 1974. “Culture and Society in the 18th Century Province: The Case of Edinburgh and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Stone, Lawrence, ed., The University in Society. Volume 2. Two volumes. Princeton and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 405–448.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas. 1983. “Adam Smith as Civic Moralist.” In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1991. English Society in the 18th Century. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Porter, Roy. 2000. The Creation of the Modern World. The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Raphael, David D. 1975. “The Impartial Spectator.” In Skinner, Andrew S. and Wilson, Thomas, eds., Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, David D. 1985. Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, David D. 2007. The Impartial Spectator. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, David D., and Macfie, Alec L.. 1976. “Introduction to The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” In Raphael, David D. and Macfie, Alec L., eds., Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Ross, Ian Simpson. 1995. The Life of Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments. Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smollett, Tobias. [1771] 2008. The Expedition of Humphrey Clinker. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. First edition. London: A. Millar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1937. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1790] 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Sixth edition. Edited by Raphael, David D. and Macfie, Alec L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smout, T. Christopher. 1983. “Where Had the Scottish Economy Got to by the Third Quarter of the Eighteenth Century?” In Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, eds., Wealth and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. 1984. “The New Eighteenth Century.” The New York Review of Books 31, 005 (March 29).Google Scholar
Temple-Smith, Richard. 2003. “Adam Smith’s Treatment of the Greeks in The Theory of Moral Sentiments: The Case of Aristotle.” In Cockfield, Geoff, Firth, Ann, and Laurent, John, eds., New Perspectives on Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century.” Past and Present 50 (February): 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1958. The Long View and the Short. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, David, and Dixon, William. 2006. “Das Adam Smith Problem: A Critical Realist Perspective.” Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2): 251–272.Google Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1996. Riches and Poverty. An Intellectual History of Political Economy in Britain, 1750–1834. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar