Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hollander, Samuel
1999.
Jeremy Bentham and Adam Smith on the usury laws: a ‘Smithian’ reply to Bentham and a new problem.
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
p.
523.
Walker, Donald A.
1999.
The Relevance for Present Economic Theory of Economic Theory Written in the Past.
Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Pack, Spencer J.
1999.
The Myth of Adam Smith By SalimRashid. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. Pp. X, 227. $80.00..
Southern Economic Journal,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
661.
Montes, Leonidas
2003.
Das Adam Smith Problem: Its Origins, the Stages of the Current Debate, and One Implication for Our Understanding of Sympathy.
Journal of the History of Economic Thought,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
63.
Davis, Gordon F.
2003.
Philosophical Psychology and Economic Psychology in David Hume and Adam Smith.
History of Political Economy,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
269.
Brink, Alexander
2008.
Trends in Business and Economic Ethics.
p.
153.
Davenport, Stewart
2008.
Das Adam Smith Problemand Faculty Psychology in the Antebellum North.
History of Political Economy,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 5,
p.
243.
Brink, Alexander
2009.
Hirschman’s Rhetoric of Reaction: U.S. and German Insights in Business Ethics.
Journal of Business Ethics,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 1,
p.
109.
Wagner-Tsukamoto, Sigmund
2013.
The Adam Smith Problem Revisited: A Methodological Resolution.
Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
Nohara, Shinji
2021.
A Genealogy of Self-Interest in Economics.
p.
47.
Diesel, Jonathon
2021.
Adam Smith on usury: An esoteric reading.
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,
Vol. 184,
Issue. ,
p.
727.
Ghosal, Sayantan
2023.
MORAL SENTIMENTS AND SELF-INTEREST IN ADAM SMITH: TWO COMMENTS.
National Institute Economic Review,
Vol. 265,
Issue. ,
p.
157.
Bonfiglioli, Riccardo
2024.
Human Nature, Mind and the Self in Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy.
p.
53.