Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:37:43.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use-Value, Exchange Value, and the Demise of Marx's Labor Theory of Value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Steve Keen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Karl Marx was the greatest champion of the labor theory of value. The logical problems of this theory have, however, split scholars of Marx into two factions: those who regard it as an indivisible component of Marxism, and those who wish to continue the spirit of analysis begun by Marx without the labor theory of value. In the debate between these two camps, the former has attempted to draw support from Marx's concepts of value, while the latter has ignored them, taking instead as their starting point the truism that production generates a surplus. Nevertheless, a careful examination of the development of Marx's logic uncovers the profound irony that, after a chance rereading of Hegel, Marx made a crucial advance which should have led him to replace the labor theory of value with the theory that commodities in general are the source of surplus. Marx's value analysis is thus consistent, not with those who would defend the labor theory of value, but with those who would transcend it.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 107 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandyopadhyay, P. 1984. “Value and Post-Sraffa Marxian Analysis,” Science and Society, 48, no. 4, 434–48.Google Scholar
Bose, A. 1980. Marx on Exploitation and Inequality, Oxford University Press, Delhi.Google Scholar
Carling, A. 1984. “Value and Strategy,” Science and Society, 48, no. 2, 129–60.Google Scholar
Carver, T. 1975. Karl Marx: Texts on Method, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ehrbar, H. and M., Glick. 1986. “The Labor Theory of Value and Its Critics,” Science and Society, 50, no. 4, 464–78.Google Scholar
Fine, B. 1986. The Value Dimension, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., and S., Bowles. 1981. “Structure and Practice in the Labor Theory of Value,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 12, no. 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
Groll, S. 1980. “The Active Role of ‘Use Value’ in Marx's Economics,” History of Political Economy, 12, no. 3, 336–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
——— and Z. B., Orzech. 1987. “Technical Progress and Values in Marx's Theory of the Decline in the Rate of Profit: An Exegetical Approach,” History of Political Economy, 19, no. 4, 591–613.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. 1982. Capitalism, Value and Exploitation, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. and J. E., King. 1985. The Political Economy of Marx, 2d ed., Longman, London.Google Scholar
Laibman, D. 1980. “Exploitation, Commodity Relations and Capitalism: A Defense of the Labor-value Formulation,” Science and Society, 44, no. 3, 274–88.Google Scholar
Lamb, D. 1987. Hegel and Modern Philosophy, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Maguire, J. 1972. Marx's Paris Writings, Gill and Macmillan, Dublin.Google Scholar
Mandel, E. 1971. The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx, NLB, London.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1846. The Poverty of Philosophy, Charles Kerr, Chicago.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1844. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1847. Wage Labor and Capital, Progress Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1857. Grundrisse, Penguin, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1859. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Progress Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1861. Theories Of Surplus Value, parts 1, 2, 3, Progress Press, Moscow.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1865. Wages, Price and Profit, Progress Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Marx, K.. 1867, 1885, 1894. Capital, I, II, III, Progress Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute, ed. 1951, 1962. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: Selected Works, 1 and 2, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow.Google Scholar
Mclennan, D. 1971. Karl Marx: Early Texts, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1973. Studies in the Labor Theory of Value, 2d ed., Lawrence & Wishart, London.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. 1983, 1985. The Making of Marx's Critical Theory, 2 vols., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1821. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 3d ed., edited by Gonner, E. C. K.. George Bell, London.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. E. 1983. “R. P. Wolff's Reinterpretation of Marx's Labor Theory of Value: Comment,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 122, no. 1, 70–83.Google Scholar
Rosdolsky, R. 1977. The Making of Marx's Capital, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
Sayer, D. 1979. Marx's Method, Harvester Press, Sussex.Google Scholar
Sekine, T. 1980. “The Necessity of the Law of Value,” Science and Society, 44, no. 3, 289–304.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1983. Hegel, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. The Wealth of Nations, 4th ed., edited by M'Culloch, J. R., Adam and Charles Black, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1960. The Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1977. Marx After Sraffa, NLB, London.Google Scholar
Wilde, L. 1989. Marx and Contradiction, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. D., A., Callari and B., Roberts. 1984. “A Marxian Alternative to the Traditional ‘Transformation Problem,’” Review of Radical Political Economics, 16, nos. 2/3, 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, R. P. 1981. “A Critique and Reinterpretation of Marx's Labor Theory of Value,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, no. 2, 89–120.Google Scholar