Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:25:35.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The History of the Concept of Transaction Costs: Neglected Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Matthias Klaes
Matthias Klaes
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy and Economics (EIPE), Erasmus University, FdW 5-06, P.O. Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to the folk history of transaction costs, the concept is due to a seminal article by Ronald H. Coase, written in the 1930s. Failing to provide an operational framework, Coase's article was neglected for a long time, or so the story continues. In the 1970s, after the limits of the Arrow-Debreu paradigm had become obvious, several authors, including Oliver E. Williamson, Kenneth J. Arrow, Armen A. Alchian, and Harold Demsetz, took up the notion of transaction costs and turned it into a useful analytical tool. Partly responsible for this sudden upsurge of interest was an article by Coase in which he allegedly proposed the now famous “Coase Theorem.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 191 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alchian, Armen A. 1965. “Some Economics of Property Rights.” In Alchian, Armen A., ed., Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., Arrow, Kenneth J., and Capron, William M.. 1958. An Economic Analysis of the Market for Scientists and Engineers, Research Memorandum RM-2190-RC. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Allais, Maurice. 1947. Economie & Intérêt, vol. 1. Paris: Librairie des Publications Officielles.Google Scholar
Allen, Douglas W. 1991. “What Are Transaction Costs?” Research in Law and Economics 14: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. “An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics.” In Arrow, Kenneth J., ed., Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In Lamberton, Donald M., ed., Economics of Information and Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963a. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” American Economic Review 53 (12): 941–73.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963b. “Comment [on J.S. Duesenberry].” Review of Economics and Statistics 45 Supplement (02): S24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1965. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care: Reply (The Implications of Transaction Costs and Adjustment Lags).” American Economic Review 55 (03): 154–58.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1969. “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation.” In Arrow, Kenneth J., ed., Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. “Information and Economic Behavior.” In Arrow, Kenneth J., ed., Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J., Harris, Theodore, and Marschak, Jacob. 1951. “Optimal Inventory Policy.” Econometrica 19 (07): 250–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, Robert K., ed. 1988. Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology. New York: Wilson.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J. 1952. “The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 66 (11): 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein: Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1951. “Inconsistency and Indeterminacy in Classical Economics.” Econometrica 19 (04): 152–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Karl and Meltzer, Allan H.. 1964. “Some Further Investigations of Demand and Supply Functions for Money.” Journal of Finance 19 (03): 240–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, Edwin H. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven N.S. 1974. “A Theory of Price Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 17 (04): 53–71.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica N.S. 4 (11): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics 2 (10): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3 (10): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1974. “The Choice of the Institutional Framework: A Comment.” Journal of Law and Economics 17: 493–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1988. “The Firm, the Market, and the Law.” In Coase, Ronald H., ed., The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahlman, Carl J. 1979. “The Problem of Externality.” Journal of Law and Economics 22 (10): 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, M.G. 1896. “Friction in Economics.” In Palgrave, R.H. Inglis, ed., Dictionary of Political Economy, vol. 2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davies, L.E. 1986. “Comment.” In Engerman, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E., eds, Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1959. Theory of Value. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1962. “New Concepts and Techniques for Equilibrium Analysis.” International Economic Review 3 (09): 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. 1996. The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Bryan. 1993. Competitive Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Duncan K. 1970. “Economic Equilibrium with Costly Marketing.” Journal of Economic Theory 2 (09): 276–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomory, Ralph E. and Baumol, William J.. 1960. “Integer Programming and Pricing.” Econometrica 28 (07): 521–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenewegen, John, ed. 1996. Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1971. “Equilibrium with Transaction Costs.” Econometrica 39 (05): 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. 1973. “On Transaction Costs, Inessential Sequence Economies and Money.” Review of Economic Studies 40 (10): 449–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Frank H. and Starr, Ross M.. 1976. “Equilibrium with Non-convex Transactions Costs: Monetary and Non-Monetary Economies.” Review of Economic Studies 43 (06): 195–215.Google Scholar
Heller, Walter P. 1972. “Transactions with Set-up Costs.” Journal of Economic Theory 4 (06): 465–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Martin F. 1993. “The Challenge of Monetary Theory.” European Economic Review 37 (04): 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1974. The Structure of Scientific Inference. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1935. “A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money.” Economica N.S. 2 (02): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1937. “Mr. Keynes and the “Classics: A Suggested Interpretation.” Econometrica 5 (01): 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karni, Edi. 1973. “Transactions Costs and the Demand for Media of Exchange.” Western Economic Journal 11 (03): 71–80.Google Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 1996. “Transaction Costs as Opportunity Costs.” Paper presented at Annual Conference of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy. Antwerp, 7–9 11.Google Scholar
Klaes, Matthias. 1998. The Emergence of Transaction Costs in Economics: A Conceptual History, Ph.D. Thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1951. “Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities.” In Koopmans, Tjalling C., ed., Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. and Beckman, Martin J.. 1957. “Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities.” Econometrica 25 (01): 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1979. Futures Past, transl. Keith, Tribe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Krier, James E. and Montgomery, David. 1973. “Resource Allocation, Information Cost and the Form of Government Intervention.” Natural Resources Journal 13 (01): 89–105.Google Scholar
Kurz, Mordecai. 1974a. “Equilibrium in a Finite Sequence of Markets with Transaction Cost.” Econometrica 42 (01): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, Mordecai. 1974b. “Equilibrium with Transaction Cost and Money in a Single Market Exchange Economy.” Journal of Economic Theory 7 (04): 418–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, Dennis S. 1962. “The Logic of the British National Health Service.” Journal of Law and Economics 5 (04): 111–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, Dennis S. and Rice, Robert G.. 1965. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care: Comment.” American Economic Review 55 (03): 140–54.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Makower, Helen and Marschak, Jacob. 1938. “Assets, Prices and Monetary Theory.” Economica N.S. 5 (08): 261–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshak, Jacob. 1938. “Money and the Theory of Assets.” Econometrica 6 (04): 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshak, Jacob. 1950. “The Rationale of the Demand for Money and of “Money Illusion.” Metroeconomica 2 (08): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1996. “More Than a Caricature: The Coase That Nobody Knows: A Review Essay.” In Warren J. Samuels and Jeff E. Biddle, eds, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 14: 373–383.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1999. “Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics.” Economics and Philosophy 15 (10): 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, H. Laurence. 1965. “Liquidity and Transaction Costs.” Southern Economic Journal 32 (07): 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mises, Ludwig von. 1912. The Theory of Money and Credit, transl. Batson, H. E.. London: Cape, 1934.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1969. “Money in a Static Theory of Optimal Payments Arrangements.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1 (11): 706–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1971. “Money and Barter in General Equilibrium with Transaction Costs.” American Economic Review 61 (12): 773–83.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1987. “Transaction Costs.” In Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 4. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ostroy, Joseph M. and Starr, Ross M.. 1990. “The Transactions Role of Money.” In Friedman, Benjamin M. and Hahn, Frank H., eds, Handbook of Monetary Economics, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1948. “Relative Prices, Say's Law, and the Demand for Money.” Econometrica 16 (04): 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1956. Money, Interest, and Prices. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1965. Money, Interest, and Prices, 2nd ed.New York and Tokyo: Harper & Row and Weatherhill.Google Scholar
Radner, Roy. 1972. “Existence of Equilibrium of Plans, Prices, and Price Expectations in a Sequence of Markets.” Econometrica 40 (04): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed.London: Macmillan, 1935.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, Paul N. 1936. “The Coordination of the General Theories of Money and Price.” Economica N.S. 3 (08): 257–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlicht, Ekkehart. 1996. “Exploiting the Coase Mechanism: The Extortion Problem.” Kyklos 49 (08): 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Screpanti, Ernesto and Zamagni, Stefano. 1993. An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Harold T. 1971. “The Efficacy of Monetary and Fiscal Policies ].” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 3 (05): 550–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shubik, Martin. 1975. “The General Equilibrium Model is Incomplete and Not Adequate for the Reconciliation of Micro and Macroeconomic Theory.” Kyklos 28 (08): 545–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Ross M. 1969. “Quasi-Equilibria in Markets with Non-Convex Preferences.” Econometrica 37 (01): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price, 3rd ed.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tobin, James. 1956. “The Interest-Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash.” Review of Economics and Statistics 38 (08): 241–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulph, Alistair M. and Ulph, David T.. 1975. “Transaction Costs in General Equilibrium Theory—A Survey.” Economica 42 (11): 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veendorp, Emiel C.H. 1972. “Money in a Static Theory of Optimal Payment Arrangements: Comment.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 4 (05): 437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicksell, Knut. 1906. Lectures on Political Economy, vol. 2, 2nd ed., transl. by Classen, E.. London: Routledge, 1935.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1973. “Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations.” American Economic Review 63 (05): 316–25.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1974. “The Economics of Antitrust: Transaction Cost Considerations.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 122 (06): 1439–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1991. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (06): 269–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1996. “Efficiency, Power, Authority and Economic Organization.” In Groenewegen, John, ed., Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar