Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:47:32.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DISSEMINATION OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS IN BRAZIL AT THE TURN OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: RUI BARBOSA BETWEEN LAW-MAKING AND POLICY-MAKING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi Open the ORCID record for Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi [Opens in a new window]  and
Alexandre Mendes Cunha
Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi
Affiliation:
Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi: Cedeplar/UFMG, [email protected]
Alexandre Mendes Cunha
Affiliation:
Alexandre Mendes Cunha: Cedeplar/UFMG, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rui Barbosa was a renowned jurist who served as the first finance minister of the Brazilian Republic, established in 1889. Despite his renown as an intellectual, Barbosa faced a severe financial crisis during his ministerial tenure and gained a bad reputation for his economic policy. In the texts produced in this context, he combined different traditions of economic thought from the point of view of the legal expert serving as economic policy-maker. In the field of public finance, while assimilating arguments associated to German state socialism and its North American developments, he was also influenced by French liberal economist Paul Leroy-Beaulieu. Through these international assimilations, Barbosa constructed an assemblage of economic ideas organized not by theoretical affiliations in the contemporary sense but around two main goals: to rationalize and legitimize his policy as finance minister and to influence the legal ordering of the Brazilian fiscal economy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 226 - 245
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Economics Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was funded by CAPES-Brazil through the National Program for Post-Doctors (PNPD).

References

REFERENCES

Adams, Henry Carter. 1887. Public Debts: An Essay in the Science of Finance. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Adams, Henry Carter. 1899. The Science of Finance: An Investigation of Public Expenditures and Public Revenues. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Astigarraga, Jesus, and Zabalza, Juan. 2014. “Public Finance in Spain in the Early Twentieth Century.” European Journal for the History of Economic Thought 21 (4): 605–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. [1888] 1949. “Câmbio—Abolição do curso forçado—Bancos de Emissão.” In Obras Completas de Rui Barbosa. Volume XV–1(2). Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. [1891] 1949. “Relatório do Ministro da Fazenda.” In Obras Completas de Rui Barbosa. Volume XVIII–2 & 3. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. [1892] 1948. “Parecer para o Projeto nº 32.” In Obras Completas de Rui Barbosa. Volume XIX–2. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. [1892] 1949. “Discursos Parlamentares.” In Obras Completas de Rui Barbosa. Volume XIX–1(2). Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Rui. [1898] 1949. “Praxes Presidenciais.” In Obras Completas de Rui Barbosa. Volume XXV–2(2). Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação.Google Scholar
Boianovsky, Mauro. 2013. “Friedrich List and the Fate of Tropical Countries.” History of Political Economy 45 (4): 647–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasil. 1890. Decreto 823-A, de Outubro de 1890. In Coleção de Leis do Brasil. Volume X, p. 2591.Google Scholar
Curi, Bruzzi, Felipe, Luiz. 2017. “From ‘Social Economy’ to ‘National Political Economy’: German Economic Ideas in Brazil.” In Cunha, Alexandre M. and Suprinyak, Carlos E., eds., The Political Economy of Latin American Independence. London: Routledge, pp. 163–184.Google Scholar
Curi, Bruzzi, Felipe, Luiz. 2019. “Adolph Wagner’s Economic Thought in Brazil: Money and Public Finance in the Turn of the 20th Century.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (3): 464–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calógeras, João P. [1910] 1960. A política monetária do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
Cardoso, José Luís. 2003. “The International Diffusion of Economic Thought.” In Samuels, Warren, Biddle, Jeff, and Davis, John B., eds., A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Oxford and New York: Blackwell, pp. 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, José Luís. 2017. “Circulating Economic Ideas: Adaptation, Appropriation, Translation.” In Cunha, Alexandre M. and Suprinyak, Carlos E., eds., The Political Economy of Latin American Independence. London: Routledge, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
Carlson, Benny. 1999. “Wagner’s Legacy in America: Re-opening Farnam’s Inquiry.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (3): 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, José Murilo de. 2002. Cidadania no Brasil: o longo caminho. Third edition. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Coats, Albert W. 1968. “Henry Carter Adams: A Case Study in the Emergence of the Social Sciences in the United States, 1850–1900.” Journal of American Studies 2 (2): 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Wilma P. 1998. “A questão fiscal na transformação republicana—continuidade e descontinuidade.” Economia e Sociedade 7 (1): 141–173.Google Scholar
Facarello, Gilbert. 2010. “Bold Ideas. French Liberal Economists and the State: Say to Leroy-Beaulieu.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (4): 719–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro C. D., and de Lourdes Mollo, Maria. 2012. “Metalistas x papelistas: origens teóricas e antecedentes do debate entre monetaristas e desenvolvimentistas.” Nova Economia 22 (2): 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Gustavo. 1983. Reforma monetária e instabilidade durante a transição republicana. Rio de Janeiro: BNDES.Google Scholar
Gambi, Thiago. 2017. “An Outline of the Economic Thinking of Joaquim José Rodrigues Torres and the Economic Policy of the Brazilian Empire (1848–58).” In Cunha, Alexandre M. and Suprinyak, Carlos E., eds., The Political Economy of Latin American Independence. London: Routledge, pp. 185–204.Google Scholar
Gemie, Sharif. 1992. “Politics, Morality and the Bourgeoisie: The Work of Paul Leroy-Beaulieu (1843–1919).” Journal of Contemporary History 27 (2): 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, Vitantonio. 2016. “The German Historical School in the Italian Debate (1870–1890).” In Cardoso, José Luís and Psalidopoulus, Michalis, eds., The German Historical School and European Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 80–96.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 2001. “The Verein für Sozialpolitik from its Foundation until World War I.” In Augello, Massimo and Guidi, Marco, eds., The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalisation of Economists. Economic Societies in Europe, America and Japan in the Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge, pp. 152–175.Google Scholar
Johnson, Marianne. 2014. “Progressivism and Academic Public Finance: 1880–1930.” History of Political Economy 46 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Waldemar. 1977. “Staatssozialismus.” In Handwörterbuch der Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Volume 3. Stuttgart and New York: Fischer; Tübingen: Mohr; Göttingen, Zürich: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, pp. 200–204.Google Scholar
Leroy-Beaulieu, Paul. 1888. Traité de la science des finances. Fourth edition. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Love, Joseph. 1996. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Underdevelopment in Rumania and Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Christian Edward Cyril. 2014. Da monarquia à oligarquia: história institucional e pensamento político brasileiro. São Paulo: Alameda.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1996. “Public Finance and Finanzwissenschaft Traditions Compared.” Finanzarchiv/Public Finance Analysis 53 (2): 145–193.Google Scholar
Poitier, Jean-Pierre. 2016. “The Reception of the German Historical Schools among French Economists (1857–1900).” In Cardoso, José Luís and Psalidopoulus, Michalis, eds., The German Historical School and European Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 22–41.Google Scholar
Rieter, Heinz. 2002. “Historische Schulen.” In Issing, Otmar, ed., Geschichte der Nationalökonomie. Fourth edition. München: Vahlen, pp. 131–168.Google Scholar
Riha, Thomas. 1985. “German Political Economy: The History of an Alternative Economics.” International Journal of Social Sciences 12 (3/4/5): 2–248.Google Scholar
Salomão, Ivan C., and Fonseca, Pedro C. D.. 2015. “Heterodoxia e industrialização no pensamento econômico de Rui Barbosa.” América Latina en la Historia Económica 22 (1): 150–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Jan-Pieter. 2013. Finanzwissenschaft im deutschprachigen Raum und in den Vereinigten Staaten, 1865–1917. Ursrpung, Inhalt und Wissenschaftstransfer. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schulz, John. 1996. A crise financeira da Abolição. São Paulo: Edusp. [English edition: Schulz, John. 2008. The Economic Crisis of Abolition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.]Google Scholar
Summerhill, William. 2015. Inglorious Revolution: Political Institutions, Sovereign Debt and Financial Underdevelopment in Imperial Brazil. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triner, Gail, and Wandschneider, Kirsten. 2005. “The Baring Crisis and the Brazilian Encilhamento, 1889–1891: An Early Example of Contagion Among Emerging Capital Markets.” Financial History Review 12 (2): 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villela, André. 1999. “The Political Economy of Money and Banking in Imperial Brazil 1850–1870.” PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. 1890. Lehr- und Handbuch der politischen Ökonomie. Vierte Hauptabteiliung: Finanzwissenschaft. Zweiter Teil: Theorie der Besteuerung, Gebührenlehre u. allgemeine Steuerlehre. Second edition. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. 1892. Lehr- und Handbuch der politischen Ökonomie. Erste Hauptabteilung: Grundlegung der politischen Ökonomie. Third edition. Halbband, Erster. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Warshaw, Dan. 1991. Paul Leroy-Beaulieu and Established Liberalism in France. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar