Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:29:27.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2007 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS REFLECTIONS ON THE SECULARIZATION OF AMERICAN ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, Ray H. 1933. Preachers Present Arms. New York: Round Table Press.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachel E.. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachel E.. 2002. “Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (4): 1167–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almodovar, Antonio and Teixeira, Pedro. 2008. “The Ascent and Decline of Catholic Economic Thought, 1830-1960.” In Bateman, Bradley W. and Spencer Banzhof, H., eds., Keeping Faith, Losing Faith: Religious Beliefs and Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 40, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 2008. “United States, Economics in, after 1945.” In Durlauf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 2008. “Faith, Morality, and Welfare: The ‘English School of Welfare Economics’, 1901-1929.” In Bateman, Bradley W. and Spencer Banzhof, H., eds., Keeping Faith, Losing Faith: Religious Beliefs and Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 40, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, William J., ed. 1988. Breaking the Academic Mould: Economists and American Higher Learning in the Nineteenth Century. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, William J. 1991. “Does Scholarship in the History of Economics Have a Useful Future?Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (2): 110–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 1998. “Clearing the Ground: The Demise of the Social Gospel Movement and the Rise of Neoclassicism in American Economics.” In Morgan, Mary and Rutherford, Malcolm, eds., The Transformation of American Economics: From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 1999. “Born Again in 1904: John R. Commons and the Social Gospel.”In Evans, C., ed., Perspectives on the Social Gospel. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 2001. “Make a Righteous Number: Social Surveys, The Men and Religion Forward Movement, and Quantification in American Economics.” In Morgan, Mary and Klein, Judy, eds., The Age of Economic Measurement. Annual Supplement to Volume 33, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 2003. “Race, Intellectual History, and American Economics: A Prolegomenon to the Past.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 711–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 2004. “Why Institutional Economics Matters as a Category of Historical Analysis.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 22A: 193–201.Google Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. 2005. “Bringing in the State?: The Life and Times of Laissez-Faire in the 19th Century United States.” In Medema, Steven G. and Boettke, Peter, eds., The Role of Government in the History of Economic Thought. Annual Supplement to Volume 37, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, Bradley W. and Kapstein, Ethan. 1999. “Between God and the Market: The Religious Roots of the American Economic Association.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (4): 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 2003. “The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.” In Samuels, Warren, Biddle, Jeff, and Davis, John, eds., A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2002. God is Dead: Secularization in the West. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish, eds. 1993. The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1988. “The Educational Revolution and the Professionalization of American Economics.” In Barber, William J., ed., Breaking the Academic Mould: Economists and American Higher Learning in the Nineteenth Century. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1992a. British and American Economic Essays, Vol. 1: On the History of Economic Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. 1992b. British and American Economic Essays, Vol. 2: The Sociology and Professionalization of Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. 2002. The Reconstruction of American Liberalism, 1865–1914. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Colander, David, Holt, Rick, and Barkley Rosser, J.. 2004. The Changing Face of Economics: Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, James E. 1998. Utilitarians and Religion. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Danbom, D. 1987. The World of Hope: Progressives and the Struggle for an Ethical Public Life. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Diner, Steven J. 1998. A Very Different Age: Americans of the Progressive Era. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Furner, M. O. 1975. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Sciences, 1865–1905. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Gorrell, Donald K. 1988. The Age of Social Responsibility: The Social Gospel in the Progressive Era, 1900-1920. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, J. 1965. The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study in the Transfer of Scholarship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 2001. “The Secularization Question and the United States in the Twentieth Century.” Church History 70 (1):132–43.Google Scholar
Knies, Karl. 1853. Die Politische Oekonomie vom Standpunkte der geschichtlichen Methode, Braunschweig: E. A. Schweischke und Sohn.Google Scholar
Knies, Karl. 1855. “Die nationalökonomische Lehre vom Werth.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 11.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “‘More Merciful and Not Less Effective’: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 709–34.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. (2005) “Retrospectives: Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 207–24.Google Scholar
Lienesch, Michael. 2007. In the Beginning: Fundamentalism, the Scopes Trial, and the Making of the Antievolution Movement. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, James. 1997. Pragmatism and the Political Economy of Cultural Revolution, 1850-1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Ralph E. 1991. The Social Gospel in Black and White: American Racial Reform, 1885-1912. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Macy, Jesse. 1894. “History From a Democratic Standpoint.” University Extension 3 (9).Google Scholar
Macy, Jesse. 1933. Jesse Macy: An Autobiography, Macy Noyes, Katherine, ed., Springfield, Il and Baltimore: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin. 1984. Pilgrims in Their Own Land: 500 Years of Religion in America. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin. 1986. Protestantism in the United States: Righteous Empire. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Meardon, Steven. 2008. “United States, Economics in, 1776–1885.” In Durlauf, Steven N. and Blume, Lawrence E., eds., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven. 2008. “‘Losing My Religion’: Sidgwick, Theism, and the Struggle for Utilitarian Ethics.” In Bateman, Bradley W. and Spencer Banzhof, H., eds., Keeping Faith, Losing Faith: Religious Beliefs and Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 40, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M.. 1998. The Transformation of American Economics: From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. and Klein, J., eds. 2001. The Age of Economic Measurement. Annual Supplement to Volume 33, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Paley, William. 1786. The Principles of Morals and Political Philosophy. London: J. Folder, 1810.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. 1999. “Institutionalism as ‘Scientific’ Economics.” In Backhouse, Roger E. and Creedy, John, eds., From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D. P. O'Brien. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. 2000. “Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (3): 277–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard. 1982. Utilitairanism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streissler, Erich W. 1990. “The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall.” In Caldwell, Bruce J., ed., Carl Menger and his Legacy in Economics, Annual Supplement to Vol. 22, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Szasz, Ferenc M. 1892. The Divided Mind of Protestant America, 1880-1930. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. The Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy, ed. 2002. The Future of the History of Economic Thought. Annual Supplement to Volume 34, History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weinbraub, E. Roy. 2005. “Autobiographical Memory and the Historiography of Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonay, Y. 1998. The Struggle for the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar