Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:21:37.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Qualified Immunity: State Power, Vigilantism and the History of Racial Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Extract

Since the historic uprisings sparked by the murder of George Floyd, growing calls to defund the police have upended mainstream political discourse in the United States. Outrage at appalling evidence of rampant police brutality and an entrenched culture of impunity have moved to the very center of public debate what were until recently dismissed as radical demands. This dramatic shift has, among other things, opened up space for discussion of the history of policing and the prison-industrial complex more broadly. In particular, abolitionists have urged examination of the deep roots of our contemporary situation. As the organizer and educator Mariame Kaba argued in an editorial published in The New York Times, “There is not a single era in United States history in which the police were not a force of violence against black people.”1 That a statement like this would appear in the paper of record reflects a paradigm shift in popular understandings of the history of the criminal legal system.

Type
Teaching the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era (SHGAPE)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Microsyllabus: Qualified Immunity: State Power, Vigilantism and the History of Racial Violence

Cothran, Boyd. “Enduring Legacy: U.S.-Indigenous Violence and the Making of American Innocence in the Gilded Age.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 14:4 (Oct. 2015): 562–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coit, Jonathan S.‘Our Changed Attitude’: Armed Defense and the New Negro in the 1919 Chicago Race Riot.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 11:2 (Apr. 2012): 225–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Julie. “Movable Empire: Labor, Migration, and U.S. Global Power During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 15:1 (Jan. 2016): 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Adam J.Understanding A National and Global Red Scare/Red Summer through the Local Invention of Solidarities.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 18:1 (Jan. 2019): 8198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piryaei, Shabnam. “State of Perpetual Emergency: Law, Militarization and State Preservation in the United States.” Journal of American Studies 52:4 (Nov. 2018): 1025–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldrep, Christopher. “Law and Society: Structuring Legal Revolutions, 1870–1920.” Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 5:4 (Oct. 2006): 309–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar