Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:29:40.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uniform boundedness principles for regular Borel vector measures

Part of: Classical measure theory Set functions, measures and integrals with values in abstract spaces Set functions and measures on spaces with additional structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Joseph Kupka
Joseph Kupka
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Monash UniversityClayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The setting is a compact Hausfroff space ω. The notion of a Walls class of subsets of Ω is defined via strange axioms—axioms whose justification rests with examples such as the collection of regular open sets or the range of a strong lifting. Avarient of Rosenthal' famous lwmma which applies directly to Banach space-valued measures is esablished, and it is used to obtain, in elementary fashion, the following two uniform boundedness principles: (1)The Nikodym Boundedness Theorem. If K is a family of regular Borel vector measures on Ω which is point-wise bounded on every set of a fixed Wells class, then K is uniformly bounded. (2)The Nikodym Covergence Theorem. If {μn} is a sequence of regular Borel vector measures on Ω which is converguent on every set of a fixed Wells class, then the μn are uniformly countably additive, the sequence {μn} is convergent on every Borel subset of Ω and the pointwise limit constitutes a regular Borel measure.

MSC classification

Secondary: 28A33: Spaces of measures, convergence of measures 28B05: Vector-valued set functions, measures and integrals 28C15: Set functions and measures on topological spaces (regularity of measures, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 206 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1980

References

Diestel, J. and Uhl, J. J. Jr (1977), Vector measures (Mathematical Surveys 15, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinculeanu, N. (1967), Vector measures (Internat. Series of Monographs in Pure and Appi. Math. 95, Pergamon Press, Oxford; VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T. (1958), Linear operators: I. General theory (Pure and AppI. Math. 7, Interscience, New York).Google Scholar
Grothendieck, A. (1953), ‘Sur les applications linéaires faiblement compactes d'espaces du type C(K)’, Canad. J. Math. 5, 129–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmos, P. R. (1950), Measure theory (Van Nostrand, Princeton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neveu, J. (1965), Mathematicalfoundations of the calculus of probability(Holden-Day, San Francisco).Google Scholar
Seever, G. L. (1968), ‘Measures on F-spaces, Trans.’, Amer. Math. Soc. 133, 267–280.Google Scholar
Traynor, T. (1973), ‘S-bounded additive set functions’, in Vector and operator valued measures and applications, Proc. Sympos., Snowbird Resort, Alta, Utah (editors Tucker, D. H. and Maynard, H. B.), pp. 355–365 (Academic Press, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, B. B. Jr (1969), ‘Weak compactness of measures,’ Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 20, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar