Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:59:45.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perfect effect algebras are categorically equivalent with Abelian interpolation po-groups

Part of: Algebraic logic General logic Ordered structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Anatolij Dvurečenskij
Anatolij Dvurečenskij
Affiliation:
Mathematical InstituteSlovak Academy of Sciences Štefánikova 49 SK-814 73 BratislavaSlovakia e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We introduce perfect effect algebras and we show that every perfect algebra is an interval in the lexicographical product of the group of all integers with an Abelian directed interpolation po-group. To show this we introduce prime ideals of effect algebras with the Riesz decomposition property (RDP). We show that the category of perfect effect algebras is categorically equivalent to the category of Abelian directed interpolation po-groups. Moreover, we prove that any perfect effect algebra is a subdirect product of antilattice effect algebras with the RDP.

Keywords

effect algebrathe Riesz decomposition propertyradicalperfect effect algebrainterpolation po-groupunital po-groupcategorical equivalence.

MSC classification

Secondary: 06F20: Ordered abelian groups, Riesz groups, ordered linear spaces 03G12: Quantum logic 03B50: Many-valued logic
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 183 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[1]Chang, C. C., ‘Algebraic analysis of many valued logics’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1958), 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Di Nola, A. and Lettieri, A., ‘Perfect MV-algebras are categorical equivalent to abelian ℓ-groups’, Studia Logica 53 (1994), 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Di Nola, A., Liguori, F. and Sessa, S., ‘Using maximals ideals in the classification of MV-algebras’, Port. Math. 50 (1993), 87–102.Google Scholar
[4]Dvurečenskij, A. and Pulmannová, S., New trends in quantum structures (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dvurečenskij, A. and Vetterlein, T., ‘Pseudoeffect algebras. II. Group representation’, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 40 (2001), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Foulis, D. J. and Bennett, M. K., ‘Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics’, Found. Phys. 24 (1994), 1325–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Fuchs, L., Partially ordered algebraic systems (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
[8]Glass, A. M. W., Partially ordered groups (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Goodearl, K. R., Partially ordered abelian groups with interpolation, Math. Surveys and Monographs 20 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1986).Google Scholar
[10]Kôpka, F. and Chovanec, F., ‘D-posets’, Math. Slovaca 44 (1994), 21–34.Google Scholar
[11]Lane, S. Mac, Categories for the working mathematician (Springer, New York, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Ravindran, K., On a structure theory of effect algebras (Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, Kansas, 1996).Google Scholar