Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:31:48.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimality criteria in set-valued optimization

Part of: Existence theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

C. S. Lalitha ,
J. Dutta  and
Misha G. Govil
C. S. Lalitha
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Rajdhani CollegeRaja Garden New Delhi-110015, India
J. Dutta
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics India Institute of TechnologyKanpur-208016India e-mail: [email protected]
Misha G. Govil
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Shri Ram College of Commerce University of DelhiDelhi-110007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The main aim of this paper is to obtain optimality conditions for a constrained set-valued optimization problem. The concept of Clarke epiderivative is introduced and is used to derive necessary optimality conditions. In order to establish sufficient optimality criteria we introduce a new class of set-valued maps which extends the class of convex set-valued maps and is different from the class of invex set-valued maps.

Keywords

set-valued optimizationcontingent epiderivativeClarke epiderivativeconearcwise connectednessoptimality

MSC classification

Secondary: 49J53: Set-valued and variational analysis 90C30: Nonlinear programming
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 2003 , pp. 221 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Aubin, J.-P., ‘Contingent derivatives of set-valued maps and existence of solutions to nonlinear inclusions and differential inclusions’, in: Mathematical analysis and applications. Part A (ed. Nachbin, I.), Adv. in Math. Suppl. Stud. 7a (Academic Press, New York, 1981) pp. 159–229.Google Scholar
[2]Aubin, J.-P., ‘Ioffe's fans and generalized derivatives of vector valued maps’, in: Convex analysis and optimization (London, 1980) (eds. Aubin, J.-P. and Vinter, R.), Research Notes in Math. 57 (Pitman, Boston, 1982) pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
[3]Aubin, J.-P. and Ekeland, I., Applied nonlinear analysis (Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
[4]Avriel, M., Nonlinear programming: theory and method (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1976).Google Scholar
[5]Clarke, F. H., Optimization and nonsmooth analysis (John Wiley, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
[6]Corley, H. W., ‘Optimality conditions for maximizations of set-valued functions’, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 58 (1988), 1–10.Google Scholar
[7]Craven, B. D., Control and optimization (Chapman and Hall Mathematics, 1995).Google Scholar
[8]Gotz, A. and Jahn, J., ‘The Lagrange multiplier rule in set-valued optimization’, SIAM J. Optim. 10 (1999), 331–344.Google Scholar
[9]Jahn, J. and Rauh, R., ‘Contingent epiderivative and set-valued optimization’, Math. Methods Oper. Res. 46 (1997), 193–211.Google Scholar
[10]Luc, D. T., ‘Contingent derivatives of set-valued maps and applications to vector optimization’, Math. Programming 50 (1991), 99–111.Google Scholar
[11]Sach, P. H. and Craven, B. D., ‘Invexity in multifunction optimization’, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 12 (1991), 383–394.Google Scholar