Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:18:41.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON SMALL SUBSPACE LATTICES IN HILBERT SPACE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2013

AIJU DONG
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics and Computer Engineering, Xi’an University of Arts and Science, Xi’an 710065, PR China email [email protected]
WENMING WU*
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, PR China
WEI YUAN
Affiliation:
Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, PR China email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the reflexivity and transitivity of a double triangle lattice of subspaces in a Hilbert space. We show that the double triangle lattice is neither reflexive nor transitive when some invertibility condition is satisfied (by the restriction of a projection under another). In this case, we show that the reflexive lattice determined by the double triangle lattice contains infinitely many projections, which partially answers a problem of Halmos on small lattices of subspaces in Hilbert spaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright ©2013 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

Arveson, W., ‘Operator algebras and invariant subspaces’, Ann. of Math. (2) 100 (1974), 433532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, K. R., Nest Algebras (Longman Scientific & Technical, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
Dong, A. and Hou, C., ‘On some automorphisms of a class of Kadison–Singer algebras’, Linear Algebra Appl. 436 (2012), 20372053.Google Scholar
Ge, L. and Yuan, W., ‘Kadison–Singer algebras, I: Hyperfinite case’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107 (5) (2010), 18381843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ge, L. and Yuan, W., ‘Kadison–Singer algebras, II: General case’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (11) (2010), 48404844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadwin, D. W., Longstaff, W. E. and Peter, R., ‘Small transitive lattices’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 87 (1) (1983), 121124.Google Scholar
Halmos, P. R., ‘Ten problems in Hilbert space’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 887933.Google Scholar
Halmos, P. R., ‘Reflexive lattices of subspaces’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 4 (1971), 257263.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. J., ‘Certain distributive lattices of subspaces are reflexive’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 8 (2) (1974), 5156.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. J., Radjavi, H. and Rosenthal, P., ‘A transitive medial subspace lattice’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (1971), 119121.Google Scholar
Hou, C. and Yuan, W., ‘Minimal generating reflexive lattices of projections in finite von Neumann algebras’, Math. Ann. 353 (2012), 499517.Google Scholar
Kadison, R. V. and Ringrose, J., Fundamentals of the Operator Algebras, Vols. I and II (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1983 and 1986).Google Scholar
Lance, C., ‘Cohomology and perturbations of nest algebras’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 43 (1981), 334356.Google Scholar
Larson, D., ‘Similarity of nest algebras’, Ann. of Math. (2) 121 (1983), 409427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, W. E., ‘Small transitive families of subspaces’, Acta Math. Sinica 19 (3) (2003), 567576.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J., ‘Zur Theorie der Unbeschränkten Matrizen’, J. reine angew. Math. 161 (1929), 208236.Google Scholar
Takesaki, M., Theory of Operator Algebras I (Springer, New York, 1979).Google Scholar
Wang, L. and Yuan, W., ‘A new class of Kadison–Singer algebras’, Expo. Math. 29 (1) (2011), 126132.Google Scholar