Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:56:32.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON BUNDLE GERBES AND INFINITE-DIMENSIONALITY

Part of: Global differential geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2011

MICHAEL MURRAY  and
DANNY STEVENSON
MICHAEL MURRAY*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia (email: [email protected])
DANNY STEVENSON
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Glasgow, 15 University Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let (P,Y ) be a bundle gerbe over a fibre bundle Y →M. We show that if M is simply connected and the fibres of Y →M are connected and finite-dimensional, then the Dixmier–Douady class of (P,Y ) is torsion. This corrects and extends an earlier result of the first author.

Keywords

bundle gerbesDixmier–Douady classinfinite-dimensionality

MSC classification

Secondary: 53C08: Gerbes, differential characters
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 81 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2011

Footnotes

The first author acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council.

References

[1]Atiyah, M. and Segal, G., ‘Twisted K-theory’, Ukr. Mat. Visn. 1 (2004), 287–330.Google Scholar
[2]Bott, R. and Tu, L. W., Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 82 (Springer, New York–Berlin, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bouwknegt, P., Carey, A. L., Mathai, V., Murray, M. K. and Stevenson, D., ‘Twisted K-theory and K-theory of bundle gerbes’, Comm. Math. Phys. 228 (2002), 17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Brylinski, J.-L., Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geometric Quantization, Progress in Mathematics, 107 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Carey, A. L., Mickelsson, J. and Murray, M. K., ‘Bundle gerbes applied to quantum field theory’, Rev. Math. Phys. 12 (2000), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Carey, A. L. and Murray, M. K., ‘Holonomy and the Wess–Zumino term’, Lett. Math. Phys. 12 (1986), 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gotay, M. J., Lashof, R., Śniatycki, J. and Weinstein, A., ‘Closed forms on symplectic fibre bundles’, Comment. Math. Helv. 58 (1983), 617–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Johnson, S., ‘Constructions with bundle gerbes’, PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide, 2003, available as arXiv:math/0312175v1.Google Scholar
[9]Murray, M. K., ‘Bundle gerbes’, J. London Math. Soc. 54 (1996), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Murray, M. K., ‘An introduction to bundle gerbes’, in: The Many Facets of Geometry, A Tribute to Nigel Hitchin (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010), pp. 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Murray, M. K. and Stevenson, D., ‘Bundle gerbes: stable isomorphism and local theory’, J. London Math. Soc. 62 (2002), 925–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Murray, M. K. and Stevenson, D., ‘The basic bundle gerbe on unitary groups’, J. Geom. Phys. 58(11) (2008), 1571–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Pressley, A. and Segal, G., Loop Groups, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar