Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:01:28.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-weak compactness of the integration map for vector measures

Part of: Set functions, measures and integrals with values in abstract spaces Integral operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

S. Okada  and
W. J. Ricker
S. Okada
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., 7001, Australia
W. J. Ricker
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let m be a vector measure with values in a Banach space X. If L1(m) denotes the space of all m integrable functions then, with respect to the mean convergence topology, L1(m) is a Banach space. A natural operator associated with m is its integration map Im which sends each f of L1(m) to the element ∫fdm (of X). Many properties of the (continuous) operator Im are closely related to the nature of the space L1(m). In general, it is difficult to identify L1(m). We aim to exhibit non-trivial examples of measures m in (non-reflexive) spaces X for which L1(m) can be explicitly computed and such that Im is not weakly compact. The examples include some well known operators from analysis (the Fourier transform on L1 ([−π, π]), the Volterra operator on L1 ([0, 1]), compact self-adjoint operators in a Hilbert space); such operators can be identified with integration maps Im (or their restrictions) for suitable measures m.

MSC classification

Secondary: 28B05: Vector-valued set functions, measures and integrals 45P05: Integral operators
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 287 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]G. P. Curbera, ‘Operators into L1 of a vector measre and applications to Banach lattices’, to appear in Math. Ann.Google Scholar
[2]Diestel, J., Sequences and series in Banach spaces, Graduate Texts in Math. 92 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Diestel, J. and Uhl, J. J. Jr, Vector measures, Math. Surveys Monographs 15 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Egghe, L., ‘The dual of L1 (μ), with μ a vector measure’, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 29 (1984), 467–471.Google Scholar
[5]Kluvánek, I. and Knowles, G., Vectors measures and control systems, North-Holland Math. Stud. vol. 20, (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976).Google Scholar
[6]Okada, S., ‘The dual space of L1(μ) for a vector measure μ’, to appear in J. Math. Anal. Appl.Google Scholar
[7]Okada, S. and Ricker, W. J., ‘Uniform operator σ-additivity of indefinite integrals induced by scalar-type spectral operators’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 101 (1985), 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Ricker, W. J., ‘A concrete realization of the dual space of L1-spaces of certain vector and operator-valued measures’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A) 42 (1987), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Ricker, W. J., ‘Separability of the L1-space of a vector measure’, to appear in Glasgow Math. J.Google Scholar
[10]Schaefer, H. H., Banach lattices and positive operators, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 215 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Zaanen, A. C., Riesz spaces II, North-Holland Math. Library 30 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983).Google Scholar