Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:17:03.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monoidal closed structures on categories with constant maps

Part of: Basic constructions Special categories Categories with structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Alessandro Logar  and
Fabio Rossi
Alessandro Logar
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mathematica Università Degli Studi di TriestePiazzale Europa, 1 34100-Trieste, Italy
Fabio Rossi
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mathematica Università Degli Studi di TriestePiazzale Europa, 1 34100-Trieste, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to study the so-called canonical monoidal closed structures on concrete categories with constant maps. First of all we give an example of a category of this kind where there exists a non canonical monoidal closed structure. Later, we give a technique to construct a class of suitable full subcategories of the category of T0-spaces, such that all monoidal closed structures on them are canonical. Finally we show that “almost all” useful categories of topological compact spaces admit no monoidal closed structures whatsoever.

MSC classification

Secondary: 18D15: Closed categories (closed monoidal and Cartesian closed categories, etc.) 18B30: Categories of topological spaces and continuous mappings 54B30: Categorical methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 175 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1985

References

[1]Booth, P. and Tillotson, J., ‘Monoidal closed, cartesian closed and convenient categories of topological spaces’, Pacific J. Math. 88 (1980), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Činčura, J., ‘On a tensor product in initially structured categories’, Math. Slovaca 29 (1979), 245–255.Google Scholar
[3]Greve, G., ‘How many monoidal closed structures are there in Top?’, Arch Math. (Basel) 34 (1980), 538–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Greve, G., Rigid spaces and monoidal closedness, 105–111, (Lecture Notes in Math., 915, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Greve, G., General construction of monoidal closed structures in topological, uniform and nearness spaces, 100–114, (Lecture Notes in Math., 962, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Herrlich, H., Categorical topology 1971–1981, General topology and its relations to modern analysis and algebra V, Proc. 5th Prague Topol. Symp. 1981 (1983), 279–383.Google Scholar
[7]Isbell, J., ‘Function spaces and adjoints’, Math. Scand. 36 (1975), 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Manes, E., Algebraic theories, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Nel, L. D., ‘Initially structured categories and cartesian closedness’, Canad. J. Math. 27 (1975), 1361–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Porst, H. and Wischnewsky, M., ‘Every topological cateogory is convenient for Gel'fand duality’, Manuscripta Math. 25 (1978), 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Porst, H. and Wischnewsky, M., Existence and applications of monoidally closed structures in topological categories, 277–292, (Lecture Notes in Math., 719, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Wyler, O., Function spaces in topological categories, 411–420, (Lecture Notes in Math., 719, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar