Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:41:30.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LOG-SINE EVALUATIONS OF MAHLER MEASURES

Part of: Algebraic number theory: global fields Other special functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

JONATHAN M. BORWEIN  and
ARMIN STRAUB
JONATHAN M. BORWEIN
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia (email: [email protected])
ARMIN STRAUB*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA (email: [email protected])
*
✉For correspondence; e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We provide evaluations of several recently studied higher and multiple Mahler measures using log-sine integrals. This is complemented with an analysis of generating functions and identities for log-sine integrals which allows the evaluations to be expressed in terms of zeta values or more general polylogarithmic terms. The machinery developed is then applied to evaluation of further families of multiple Mahler measures.

Keywords

log-sine integralsMahler measuremultiple polylogarithmsmultiple zeta valuesClausen functions

MSC classification

Secondary: 33E20: Other functions defined by series and integrals 11R06: PV-numbers and generalizations; other special algebraic numbers; Mahler measure
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 15 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 2012

Footnotes

Borwein was supported in part by the Australian Research Council and the University of Newcastle.

References

[1]Akatsuka, H., ‘Zeta Mahler measures’, J. Number Theory 129(11) (2009), 2713–2734.Google Scholar
[2]Borwein, J. M., Bailey, D. H. and Girgensohn, R., Experimentation in Mathematics: Computational Paths to Discovery, 1st edn (A K Peters, Natick, MA, 2004).Google Scholar
[3]Borwein, D., Borwein, J. M., Straub, A. and Wan, J., ‘Log-sine evaluations of Mahler measures, II’, Integers, in press.Google Scholar
[4]Borwein, J. M., Bradley, D. M., Broadhurst, D. J. and Lisoněk, P., ‘Special values of multiple polylogarithms’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353(3) (2001), 907–941.Google Scholar
[5]Borwein, J. M., Broadhurst, D. J. and Kamnitzer, J., ‘Central binomial sums, multiple Clausen values, and zeta values’, Experiment. Math. 10(1) (2001), 25–34.Google Scholar
[6]Borwein, J. M., Chan, O.-Y. and Crandall, R. E., ‘Higher-dimensional box integrals’, Experiment. Math. 19(3) (2010), 431–446.Google Scholar
[7]Borwein, J. M. and Crandall, R. E., ‘Closed forms: what they are and why we care’. Notices Amer. Math. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
[8]Borwein, J. M. and Straub, A., ‘Special values of generalized log-sine integrals’. Proceedings of ISSAC 2011 (36th International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation) San Jose, CA, June 2011 (ACM, New York, 2011), pp 43–50.Google Scholar
[9]Borwein, J. M., Straub, A., Wan, J. and Zudilin, W., ‘Densities of short uniform random walks (with an appendix by Don Zagier)’. Canadian J. Math., published electronically at http://dx.doi.org/10.4153/CJM-2011-079-2.Google Scholar
[10]Borwein, J. M., Zucker, I. J. and Boersma, J., ‘The evaluation of character Euler double sums’, Ramanujan J. 15(3) (2008), 377–405.Google Scholar
[11]Boyd, D. W., ‘Speculations concerning the range of Mahler’s measure’, Canad. Math. Bull. 24 (1981), 453–469.Google Scholar
[12]Davydychev, A. and Kalmykov, M., ‘New results for the ε-expansion of certain one-, two- and three-loop Feynman diagrams’, Nuclear Phys. B 605 (2001), 266–318.Google Scholar
[13]Finch, S., ‘Modular forms on SL 2(ℤ)’, Preprint, 2005.Google Scholar
[14]Fuchs, W., ‘Two definite integrals (solution to a problem posed by L. Lewin)’, Amer. Math. Monthly 68(6) (1961), 580–581.Google Scholar
[15]Kalmykov, M., ‘About higher order ϵ-expansion of some massive two- and three-loop master-integrals’, Nuclear Phys. B 718 (2005), 276–292.Google Scholar
[16]Kurokawa, N., Lalín, M. and Ochiai, H., ‘Higher Mahler measures and zeta functions’, Acta Arith. 135(3) (2008), 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Lalín, M. and Sinha, K., ‘Higher Mahler measure of cyclotomic polynomials and Lehmer’s question’, Ramanujan J. 26 (2011), 257–294.Google Scholar
[18]Lewin, L., Polylogarithms and Associated Functions (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).Google Scholar
[19]Lewin, L., ‘On the evaluation of log-sine integrals’, The Mathematical Gazette 42 (1958), 125–128.Google Scholar
[20]Olver, F. W. J., Lozier, D. W., Boisvert, R. F. and Clark, C. W., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).Google Scholar
[21]Poorten, A. v.  d., ‘A proof that Euler missed…Apéry’s proof of the irrationality of ζ(3)’, Math. Intelligencer 1(4) (1979), 195–203.Google Scholar
[22]Sasaki, Y., ‘On multiple higher Mahler measures and multiple L values’, Acta Arith. 144(2) (2010), 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar