Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:17:19.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite Fourier series and ovals in PG(2, 2h)

Part of: Finite geometry and special incidence structures Designs and configurations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

J. Chris Fisher  and
Bernhard Schmidt
J. Chris Fisher
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Regina, Regina S4S 0A2, Canada, e-mail: [email protected]
Bernhard Schmidt
Affiliation:
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, No. I Nanyang Walk, B]k 5, Level 3, Singapore, 637616, e-mail: bernhard @ ntu.edu.sg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We propose the use of finite Fourier series as an alternative means of representing ovals in projective planes of even order. As an example to illustrate the method's potential, we show that the set {wj + w3j + w−3j: 0 ≤ j ≤ 2h} ⊂ GF (22h) forms an oval if w is a primitive (2h + 1)st root of unity in GF(22h) and GF(22h) is viewed as an affine plane over GF(2h). For the verification, we only need some elementary ‘trigonometric identities’ and a basic irreducibility lemma that is of independent interest. Finally, we show that our example is the Payne oval when h is odd, and the Adelaide oval when h is even.

MSC classification

Secondary: 51E20: Combinatorial structures in finite projective spaces 05B25: Finite geometries
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 2006 , pp. 21 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2006

References

[1]Cherowitzo, W., ‘Hyperoval web page’, http://www-math. cudenver. edu/~wcherowi/research/hyperoval/hypero.html.Google Scholar
[2]Cherowitzo, W., ‘Hyperovals in Desarguesian planes: an update’, Discrete Math. 155 (1996), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cherowitzo, W. E., O'Keefe, C. M. and Penttila, T., ‘A unified construction of finite geometries associated with q-clans in characteristic two’, Adv. Geom. 3 (2003), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fisher, J. C. and Jamison, R. E., ‘Properties of affinely regular polygons’, Geom. Dedicata 69 (1998), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hirschfeld, J. W. P., Projective geometries over finite fields (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
[6]Ilkka, S., ‘A trigonometric analysis of angles in finite Desarguesian planes’, Report-HTKK-MatA44, (Helsinki Univ. of Tech., Institute of Math., SF-02 150 Otaniemi, Finland, 1974).Google Scholar
[7]Korchmáros, G., ‘Old and new results on ovals in finite projective planes’, in: Surveys in Combinatorics (Guildford, 1991), LMS Lect. Note Ser. 166 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991) pp. 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Payne, S. E. and Thas, Joseph A., ‘The stabilizer of the Adelaide oval’, Discrete Math. 294 (2005). 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Penttila, T., ‘Configurations of ovals. Combinatorics 2002 (Maratea)’, J. Geom. 76 (2003), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Schoenberg, I. J., ‘The finite Fourier series and elementary geometry’, Amer Math. Monthly 57 (1950), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Schoenberg, I. J., Mathematical time exposures (Mathematical Association of America, Washington D.C., 1982).Google Scholar
[12]Schröder, E. M., ‘Kreisgeometrische Darstellung metrischer Ebenen und veraligemeinerte Winkelund Distanzfunktionen’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 42 (1974), 154–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Thas, J. A., Payne, S. E. and Gevaert, H., ‘A family of ovals with few collineations’, European J. Combin. 9 (1988), 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar