Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:02:32.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equivariant KK-theory for inverse limits of G-C*-algebras

Part of: $K$-theory and operator algebras Homology and cohomology theories Topological $K$-theory Selfadjoint operator algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Claude Schochet
Claude Schochet
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Kasparov groups are extended to the setting of inverse limits of G-C*-algebras, where G is assumed to be a locally compact group. The K K-product and other important features of the theory are generalized to this setting.

Keywords

Kasparov groupsK K-theoryequivariant K-theorypro-C*-algebrasσ-C*-algebrasinverse limit of G-C*-algebraspro-G-C*-algebrasσ-G-C*-algebras.

MSC classification

Secondary: 19K33: EXT and $K$-homology 19L47: Equivariant $K$-theory 46L80: $K$-theory and operator algebras (including cyclic theory) 55N91: Equivariant homology and cohomology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 183 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1994

References

[1]Choi, M. D. and Effros, E. G., ‘The completely positive lifting problem’, Annals. of Math. 104 (1976), 585–609.Google Scholar
[2]Cuntz, J. and Skandalis, G., ‘Mapping cones and exact sequences in K K-theory’, J. Operator Theory 15 (1986), 163–180.Google Scholar
[3]Kasparov, G. G., ‘Hilbert C*-modules: theorems of Stinespring and Voiculescu’, J. Operator Theory 4 (1980), 133–150.Google Scholar
[4]Kasparov, G. G., ‘The operator K-functor and extensions of C*-algebras’, Math. USSR lzv. 16 (1981), 513–572.Google Scholar
[5]Kasparov, G. G., ‘Equivariant K K-theory and the Novikov conjecture’, Invent. Math. 91 (1988), 147–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Milnor, J., ‘On aximatic homology theory’, Pacific J. Math. 12 (1962), 337–341.Google Scholar
[7]Mingo, J. A., ‘K-theory and multipliers of stable C*-algebras’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 299 (1987), 397–411.Google Scholar
[8]Phillips, N. C., ‘Inverse limits of C*-algebras’, J. Operator Theory 19 (1988), 159–195.Google Scholar
[9]Phillips, N. C., ‘Representable K-theory for σ-C*-algebras’, K-Theory 3 (1989), 441–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Rosenberg, J., and Schochet, C., The Künneth theorem and the universal coefficient theorem for equivariant K-theory and KK-theory, Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. No. 348 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1986).Google Scholar
[11]Rosenberg, J., and Schochet, C., ‘The Künneth theorem and the universal coefficient theorem for Kasparov's generalized K-functor’, Duke Math. J. 55 (1987), 431–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Schmúdgen, K., ‘Über LMC*-Algebren’, Math. Nachr. 68 (1975), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Schochet, C., ‘Topological methods for C*-algebras III: axiomatic homology’, Pacific J. Math. 114 (1984), 399–445.Google Scholar
[14]Schochet, C., ‘The Kasparov groups for commutative C*-algebras and Spanier-Whitehead duality’, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 51 Part II (1990), 307–321.Google Scholar
[15]Skandalis, G., ‘Some remarks on Kasparov theory’, J. Funct. Anal. 56 (1984), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Skandalis, G., ‘Exact sequences for the Kasparov groups of graded algebras’, Canadian J. Math. 37 (1985), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Weidner, J., ‘K K -groups for generalized operator algebras I’, K -Theory 3 (1989), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Weidner, J., ‘K K -groups for generalized operator algebras II’, K -Theory 3 (1989), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar