Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:13:26.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epicompletetion of archimedean l–groups and vector lattices with weak unit

Part of: Topological linear spaces and related structures General theory of categories and functors Peculiar spaces Maps and general types of spaces defined by maps Ordered structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Richard N. Ball  and
Anthony W. Hager
Richard N. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Boise State UniversityBoise, Idaho 83725, U.S.A.
Anthony W. Hager
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Wesleyan UniversityMiddletown, Connecticut 06457, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the category W of archimedean l–groups with distinguished weak order unit, with unitpreserving l–homorphism, let B be the class of W-objects of the form D(X), with X basically disconnected, or, what is the same thing (we show), the W-objects of the M/N, where M is a vector lattice of measurable functions and N is an abstract ideal of null functions. In earlier work, we have characterized the epimorphisms in W, and shown that an object G is epicomplete (that is, has no proper epic extension) if and only if G ∈ B. This describes the epicompletetions of a give G (that is, epicomplete objects epically containing G). First, we note that an epicompletion of G is just a “B-completion”, that is, a minimal extension of G by a B–object, that is, by a vector lattice of measurable functions modulo null functions. (C[0, 1] has 2c non-eqivalent such extensions.) Then (we show) the B–completions, or epicompletions, of G are exactly the quotients of the l–group B(Y(G)) of real-valued Baire functions on the Yosida space Y(G) of G, by σ-ideals I for which G embeds naturally in B(Y(G))/I. There is a smallest I, called N(G), and over the embedding G ≦ B(Y(G))/N(G) lifts any homorphism from G to a B–object. (The existence, though not the nature, of such a “reflective” epicompletion was first shown by Madden and Vermeer, using locales, then verified by us using properties of the class B.) There is a unique maximal (not maximum) such I, called M(Y(G)), and B(Y(G))/M(Y(G)) is the unique essentialBcompletion. There is an intermediate σ -ideal, called Z(Y(G)), and the embedding G ≦ B(y(G))/Z(Y(G)) is a σ-embedding, and functorial for σ -homomorphisms. The sistuation stands in strong analogy to the theory in Boolean algebras of free σ -algebras and σ -extensions, though there are crucial differences.

MSC classification

Secondary: 06F20: Ordered abelian groups, Riesz groups, ordered linear spaces 46A40: Ordered topological linear spaces, vector lattices 54C40: Algebraic properties of function spaces 18A40: Adjoint functors (universal constructions, reflective subcategories, Kan extensions, etc.) 54G05: Extremally disconnected spaces, $F$-spaces, etc.
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 25 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1990

References

[1]Ball, R. N. and Hager, A. W., Charaterization of epimorphisms in archimedean l-groups and vector lattices, Ch. 8 of Lattice-Ordered Groups, Advances and Techniques, Glass, A. and Holland, W. C., Editors, Kluwer Acad. Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989.Google Scholar
[2]Ball, R. N. and Hager, A. W., ‘Epicomplete archimedean l–groups’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
[3]Bigard, A., Keimel, K. and Wolfenstein, S., Groups et anneaux réticulés (Springer Lecture Notes 608, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Conrad, P. F., ‘The essential closure of an archimedean lattice-ordered group’, Proc. London Math. Soc. 38 (1971), 151–160.Google Scholar
[5]Dashiell, F., Hager, A. W. and Henriksen, M., ‘Order-Cauchy completions of rings and vector lattices of continuous functions’, Canad. J. Math. 32 (1980), 657–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Engelking, R., Outline of general topology (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968).Google Scholar
[7]Fremlin, D. H., ‘Inexetensible Riesz spaces’, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 77 (1975), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions (Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, 1960, reprinted as Springer-Verlag Graduate Texts 43, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hager, A. W., ‘Algebras of measurable functions’, Duke Math. J. 38 (1971), 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hager, A. W., ‘C (X) has no proper functorial hulls’, Rings of continuous functions, pp. 149–164, (Aull, C. E., Editor, Dekker Lecture 95, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
[11]Hager, A. W. and Madden, J. J., ‘Essential reflections versus minimal embeddings’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 37 (1985), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hager, A. W. and Robertson, L. C., ‘Representing and ringifying a Riesz space’, Symposia Mathematica 21 (1977), 411–431.Google Scholar
[13]Halmos, P. R., Lectres on Boolean algebras (Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, N.J, 1963).Google Scholar
[14]Hausdorff, F., Set theory (2nd edition, Chelsea Publ. Co., N.Y., 1962).Google Scholar
[15]Henriksen, M. and Johnson, D. G., ‘On the structure of a class of archimedean latticeordered algeebras’, Fund. Math. 50 (1961), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Herrlich, H. and Strecker, G., Category theory (Allyn and Bacon Co., Boston 1973, reprinted as Springer-Verlag Graduate Texts).Google Scholar
[17]Hewitt, E. and Ross, K. A., Abstract harmonic analysis, I, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963).Google Scholar
[18]Kruse, A. H., ‘Badly incomplete normed linear spaces’, Math. Z. 83 (1964), 314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Madden, J. J. and Vermeer, J., ‘Epicomplete archimedean l–groups via a localic Yosida theorem’, to appear.Google Scholar
[20]Rieger, L., ‘On free ℵξ-complete Boolean algebras’, Fund. Math. 38 (1951), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Sikorski, R., Boolean algebras (1st edition), Springer-Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
[22]Sikorski, R., Boolean algebras (3rd edition), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Stone, M. H., ‘Boundedness properties in function-lattices’, Canad. J. Math. 1 (1949), 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Tzeng, Z., Extended-real-valued functions and the projective resolution of a compact Hausdorff space (Thesis, Wesleyan University, 1970).Google Scholar
[25]Veksler, A. I., ‘P-sets in topolgical spaces’, Soviet Math. Dokl. 11 (1970), 953–956.Google Scholar
[26]Vermeer, J., ‘The smallest basically disconnected preimage of a space’, Topology Appl. 17 (1984), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Vulikh, B. Z., Introduction to the theory of partially ordered spaces (Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, 1967).Google Scholar
[28]Weinberg, E., Higher degrees of distributivity in lattices of continuous functions (Thesis, Purdue Univ., 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Yaqub, F. M., ‘Free extension of Boolean algebras’, Pacific J. Math. 13 (1963), 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar