Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:37:21.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embeddings of quaternion space in S4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Atsuko Katanaga
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba-city, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan e-mail: [email protected]
Osamu Saeki
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider a (real) projective plane which is topologically locally flatly embedded in S4. It is known that it always admits a 2-disk bundle neighborhood, whose boundary is homeomorphic to the quaternion space Q, the total space of the nonorientable S1-bundle over RP2 with Euler number ± 2, with fundamental group isomorphic to the quaternion group of order eight. Conversely let f: Q → S4 be an arbitrary locally flat topological embedding. Then we show that the closure of each connected component of S4f(Q) is always homeomorphic to the exterior of a topologically locally flatly embedded projective plane in S4. We also show that, for a large class of embedded projective planes in S4, a pair of exteriors of such embedded projective planes is always realized as the closures of the connected components of S4f(Q) for some locally flat topological embedding f: Q → S4.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1998

References

[1]Brown, M., ‘A proof of the generalized Schoenflies theorem’. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1960), 7476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brown, M., ‘Locally flat embeddings of topological manifolds’, in: Topology of 3-Manifolds and Related Topics (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1962) pp. 8391.Google Scholar
[3]Crowell, R. H. and Fox, R. H., Introduction to knot theory (Ginn and Comp., Boston, 1963).Google Scholar
[4]Fox, R. H., ‘On the embedding of polyhedra in 3-space’, Ann. of Math. 49 (1948), 462470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Freedman, M. H., ‘The topology of four dimensional manifolds’. J. Differential Geom. 17 (1982), 357453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Freedman, M. H. and Quinn, F., Topology of 4-manifolds (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1990).Google Scholar
[7]Kamada, S., ‘On deform-spun projective planes in 4-sphere obtained from peripheral inverting deformations’, in: Algebra and topology (Taejon, 1990), Proc. of KAIST Math. Workshop 5. Korea, 1990, pp. 197203.Google Scholar
[8]Kamada, S., ‘Projective planes in 4-sphere obtained by deform-spinnings’, in: Knots 90 (ed. Kawauchi, A.) (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1992) pp. 125132.Google Scholar
[9]Kinoshita, S., ‘On the Alexander polynomial of 2-spheres in a 4-sphere’, Ann. of Math. 74 (1961), 518531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kirby, R. C., The topology of 4-manifolds, Lect. Notes in Math., 1374 (Springer, Berlin, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lawson, T., ‘Splitting S 4 on RP 2 via the branched cover of CP 2 over S 4’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 86 (1982), 328330.Google Scholar
[12]Lawson, T., ‘Detecting the standard embeddings of RP 2 in S 4’, Math. Ann. 267 (1984), 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lucas, L. A., Neto, O. M. and Saeki, O., ‘A generalization of Alexander's torus theorem to higher dimensions and an unknotting theorem for Sp × Sq embedded in Sp+q +2’, Kobe J. Math. 13 (1996), 145165.Google Scholar
[14]Massey, W. S., ‘Proof of a conjecture of Whitney’, Pacific J. Math. 31 (1969), 143156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Massey, W. S., ‘Imbeddings of projective planes and related manifolds in spheres’, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 23 (1974), 791812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Montesinos, J. M., ‘On twins in the four-sphere I’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford 34 (1983), 171199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Orlik, P., Seifert manifolds, Lect. Notes in Math., 291 (Springer, Berlin, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Price, T. M., ‘Homeomorphisms of quaternion space and projective planes in four space’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 23 (1977). 112128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Price, T. M. and Roseman, D. M., ‘Embeddings of the projective plane in four space’, preprint, (Univ. of Iowa, 1975).Google Scholar
[20]Rubinstein, J. H., ‘Dehn's lemma and handle decompositions of some 4-manifolds’, Pacific J. Math. 86 (1980), 565569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Yamada, Y., ‘Decomposition of S 4 as a twisted double of a certain manifold’, Tokyo J. Math. 20 (1997), 2333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Yamada, Y., ‘Some Seifert 3-manifolds which decompose S 4 as a twisted double’, in: Knots ' '96 (ed. Suzuki, S.) (World Scientific, 1997) pp. 545550.Google Scholar
[23]Yamada, Y., ‘Decomposition of the four sphere as a union of RP 2-knot exteriors’, in: Proc. Applied Math. Workshop, vol. 8 (eds. Gin, G. T. and Ko, K. H., Center for Applied Math., KAIST, Taejon, 1998) pp. 345351.Google Scholar
[24]Yamada, Y., Saeki, O., Teragaito, M. and Katanaga, A., ‘Gluck surgery along a 2-sphere in a 4-manifold is realized by surgery along a projective plane’, Preprint Series, UTMS 97–42, Univ. of Tokyo, 1997.Google Scholar
[25]Yoshikawa, K., ‘Surfaces in R 4’ (in Japanese), in: Proc. of infinite groups and topology (Osaka, 1986) pp. 7698.Google Scholar