Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:09:06.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chebyshev subspaces of finite codimension in spaces of continuous functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

A. L. Brown
A. L. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon TyneEngland and University of NewcastleNew South Wales, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A. L. Garkavi in 1967 characterized those compact metric spaces X with the property that the space C(X) of real-valued continuous functions possesses Chebyshev subspaces of fine codimension ≥ 2. Here compact Hausdorif spaces with the same property are characterized in terms of certain standard subspaces of the space [0, 1] × {0, 1} equipped with a lexicographic order topology. Garkavi's result for metric spaces is exhibited as a corollary. The proof depends upon a simplification of a characterization by Garkavi of the Chebyshev subspaces of finite codimension in C(X).

Subject classification (Amer. Math. Soc. (MOS) 1970): primary 41 A 65, 46 E 15; secondary 54 G 99.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , August 1978 , pp. 99 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1978

References

Cheney, E. W. and Wulbert, D. E. (1969), “Existence and unicity of best approximations”, Math. Scand. 24, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, G., Larman, D. G. and Rogers, C. A. (1970), “The directions of the line segments and of the r-dimensional balls on the boundary of a convex body in euclidean space”, Mathematika 17, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garkavi, A. L. (1964), “Approximation properties of subspaces with finite defect in the space of continuous functions”, Dokl Akad. Nauk SSSR 155, 513–516. Translation: Soviet Math., Doklady 5, 440–443.Google Scholar
Garkavi, A. L. (1967), “The Helly problem and best approximation in spaces of continuous functions”, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 31, 641–656.Google Scholar
Garkavi, A. L. (1967a), “On compact metric spaces which possess Chebyshev systems of measures”, Mat. Sbornik (new ser.), 74, 209–217.Google Scholar
Klee, V. L. (1969), “Can the boundary of a d-dimensional convex body contain segments in all directions?” Amer. Math. Month. 76, 408–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, I. (1970), Best Approximation in Normed Linear Spaces by Elements of Linear Subspaces (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, I. (1974), The Theory of Best Approximation and Functional Analysis (CBMS, SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar