Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:50:58.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

0-Hecke algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

P. N. Norton
P. N. Norton
Affiliation:
Technical Education Division Education Department of W.A. 36 Parliament Place West Perth, Western Australia, 6005, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The structure of a 0-Hecke algebra H of type (W, R) over a field is examined. H has 2n distinct irreducible representations, where n = ∣R∣, all of which are one-dimensional, and correspond in a natural way with subsets of R. H can be written as a direct sum of 2n indecomposable left ideals, in a similar way to Solomon's (1968) decomposition of the underlying Coxeter group W.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 337 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1979

References

Bourbaki, N. (1968), Groupes et algèbres de Lie, Chapitres 4, 5 et 6 (Hermann, Paris).Google Scholar
Carter, R. W. (1972), Simple groups of Lie type (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I. (1962), Representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras (Interscience Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
Dornhoff, L. (1972), (Group representation theory, Part B. Marcel Decker, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
Solomon, L. (1968), ‘A decomposition of the group algabra of a finite Coxeter group’, J. Algebra, 9, 220–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. (1967), Lectures on Chevalley groups (Yale University).Google Scholar