Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:19:56.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial

Part of: Women in the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2018

TAD M. SCHMALTZ
TAD M. SCHMALTZ*
Affiliation:
SPECIAL SERIES IN WOMEN IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY EDITOR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Editorial
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Fall 2018 , pp. 279
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2018 

The Journal of the American Philosophical Association will be running a number of special series, each unified by a given theme designed to introduce readers to a field of philosophy with which they may not be familiar. The editorial conceit is to commission specialists to take a somewhat free hand in writing in an area they are passionate about, but in a way that is accessible to a new audience. In this issue, we kick off our Special Series in Women in the History of Philosophy with a paper by Jessica Gordon-Roth that addresses scholarly disagreement over the nature of the monistic ontology of Anne Finch Conway (1631–1679). Future issues will continue the series on an occasional basis, featuring papers on contributions to Western Philosophy by women from various periods of its history.