Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T18:19:54.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transitional Anger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2015

MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF [email protected]

Abstract:

A close philosophical analysis of the emotion of anger will show that it is normatively irrational: in some cases, based on futile magical thinking, in others, based on defective values.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Averill, James. (1982) Anger and Aggression. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom. (2012) Punishment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chrysippus. Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, III.478.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard. (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie. (1988) ‘Forgiveness and Resentment’. In Murphy, Jeffrie and Hampton, Jean, Forgiveness and Mercy (New York: Cambridge University Press), ch. 1.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie, and Hampton, Jean. (1988) Forgiveness and Mercy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. (2013) Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. ([1962] 1968) ‘Freedom and Resentment’. Repr. in Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 7196.Google Scholar
Tavris, Carol. (1982) Anger: The Misunderstood Emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. (1994) Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar