Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:56:33.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transcendental Argument of the Novel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2017

GILBERT PLUMER
GILBERT PLUMER*
Affiliation:
LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL (RETIRED)[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Can fictional narration yield knowledge in a way that depends crucially on its being fictional? This is the hard question of literary cognitivism. It is unexceptional that knowledge can be gained from fictional literature in ways that are not dependent on its fictionality (e.g., the science in science fiction). Sometimes fictional narratives are taken to exhibit the structure of suppositional argument, sometimes analogical argument. Of course, neither structure is unique to narratives. The thesis of literary cognitivism would be supported if some novels exhibit a cogent and special argument structure restricted to fictional narratives. I contend that this is the case for a kind of transcendental argument. The reason is the inclusion and pattern of occurrence of the predicate ‘believable’ in the schema. Believability with respect to fictional stories is quite a different thing than it is with respect to nonfictional stories or anything else.

Keywords

literary cognitivismtranscendentalitybelievabilityhuman naturemindreadingtruth in fiction
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Summer 2017 , pp. 148 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, Noël. (2002) ‘The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 60, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul. (1981) ‘Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes’. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 67–90.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory, and Jureidini, Jon. (2004) ‘Narrative and Coherence’. Mind & Language, 19, 409–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2010) Narratives and Narrators: A Philosophy of Stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2011a) ‘Telling Stories’. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 54, 44–49.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2011b) ‘Literature and the Psychology Lab’. The Times Literary Supplement, August 31.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2012) ‘Literature and Truthfulness’. In Maclaurin, J. (ed.), Rationis Defensor: Essays in Honour of Colin Cheyne (Dordrecht: Springer), 23–31.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2013) ‘Does Great Literature Make Us Better?’ The New York Times, June 1. Available at: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/01/does-great-literature-make-us-better/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0. Accessed May 27, 2017.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2014a) ‘Creativity and the Insight that Literature Brings’. In Paul, E. S. and Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Philosophy of Creativity: New Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 39–61.Google Scholar
Currie, Gregory. (2014b) ‘Getting out of the Armchair to do Aesthetics’. In Haug, M. C. (ed.), Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory (London: Routledge), 435–49.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1991) ‘Three Varieties of Knowledge’. In Phillips-Griffiths, A. (ed.), A. J. Ayer: Memorial Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 153–66.Google Scholar
Evnine, Simon J. (2008) ‘Kinds and Conscious Experience: Is There Anything That it is Like to Be Something?’. Metaphilosophy, 39, 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Walter R., and Filloy, Richard A.. (1982) ‘Argument in Drama and Literature: An Exploration’. In Cox, J. R. and Willard, C. A. (eds.), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press), 343–62.Google Scholar
Fisher, Walter R. (1987) Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Friend, Stacy. (2014) ‘Believing in Stories’. In Currie, G. et al. (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 227–48.Google Scholar
Gier, Nicholas F. (1980) ‘Wittgenstein and Forms of Life’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 10, 241–58.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. (2007) ‘Sociobiology and the Theory of Natural Selection’. In Ruse, M. (ed.), Philosophy of Biology, 2d ed. (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books), 251–61.Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell. (2010) ‘How and What We Can Learn from Fiction’. In Hagberg, G. L. and Jost, W. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanfling, Oswald. (2002) Wittgenstein and the Human Form of Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hospers, John. (1958) ‘Literature and Human Nature’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 17, 45–57.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lester H. (2009) ‘Literature as Fable, Fable as Argument’. Philosophy and Literature, 33, 369–85.Google Scholar
Kafka, Franz. ([1915]2003) The Metamorphosis . In The Metamorphosis and Other Stories (New York: Barnes & Noble Classics), 5–52.Google Scholar
Kishik, David. (2008) Wittgenstein's Form of Life. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter. (2004) ‘On Not Expecting Too Much from Narrative’. Mind & Language, 19, 393–408.Google Scholar
Lamarque, Peter. (2014) The Opacity of Narrative. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1948) The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Mikkonen, Jukka. (2013) The Cognitive Value of Philosophical Fiction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. (1974) ‘What is it Like to be a Bat?’. Philosophical Review, 83, 435–50.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1990) Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olmos, Paula. (2014) ‘Classical Fables as Arguments: Narration and Analogy’. In Ribeiro, H. J. (ed.), Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy (Cham: Springer), 189–208.Google Scholar
Palmer, William J. (1973) ‘Two Dramatists: Lovelace and Richardson in Clarissa’. Studies in the Novel, 5, 7–21.Google Scholar
Plumer, Gilbert. (2015) ‘On Novels as Arguments’. Informal Logic, 35, 488–507.Google Scholar
Plumer, Gilbert. (2017) ‘Analogy, Supposition, and Transcendentality in Narrative Argument’. In Olmos, P. (ed.), Narration as Argument (Cham: Springer), 63–81.Google Scholar
Rodden, John. (2008) ‘How Do Stories Convince Us? Notes towards a Rhetoric of Narrative’. College Literature, 35, 148–73.Google Scholar
Schultz, Robert A. (1979) ‘Analogues of Argument in Fictional Narrative’. Poetics, 8, 231–44.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert. (2007) ‘Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty’. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74, 143–61.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen P., and Nicols, Shaun. (2003) ‘Folk Psychology’. In Stich, S. P. and Warfield, T. A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 235–55.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Daniel. (2016) ‘The Semantics of “What it's Like” and the Nature of Consciousness’. Mind, 125, 1161–98.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. (1968) ‘Transcendental Arguments’. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 241–56.Google Scholar
Swirski, Peter. (2007) Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution and Game Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilghman, Benjamin R. (1991) ‘What is it Like to be an Aardvark?’. Philosophy, 66, 325–38.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas, Reed, Chris, and Macagno, Fabrizio. (2008) Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Martin. (2016) The Aesthetics of Argument. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, William B. (1979) ‘Proposal and Habitation: The Temporality and Authority of Interpretation in and about a Scene of Richardson's Clarissa’. Boundary 2, 7, 169–200.Google Scholar
Weir, Andy. (2014) The Martian. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar