Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:43:19.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tragic Flaws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2021

NATHAN BALLANTYNE
NATHAN BALLANTYNE*
Affiliation:
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many tragic plays, the protagonist is brought down by a disaster that is a consequence of the protagonist's own error, his or her hamartia, the tragic flaw. Tragic flaws are disconcerting to the audience because they are not known or fully recognized by the protagonist—at least not until it is too late. In this essay, I take tragic flaws to be unreliable belief-forming dispositions that are unrecognized by us in some sense. I describe some different types of flaws and consider what we might do about them. Then I examine three types of policies for managing our tragic flaws: doxastic, dispositional, and methodological.

Keywords

social epistemologybiasesignoranceself-judgmentintellectual humility
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Spring 2022 , pp. 20 - 40
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments and conversations, I am indebted to a number of people: Teresa Allen, Alex Arnold, Jason Baehr, Michael Bergmann, John Heil, Tomás Bogardus, Charlie Crerar, Carlo DaVia, David Dunning, Peter Graham, Paul Gooch, Noah Hahn, Madeline Jalbert, Samuel Kampa, Hilary Kornblith, Michael Lynch, Gordon Pennycook, Tenelle Porter, Norbert Schwarz, Peter Seipel, Fritz Strack, Joseph Vukov, Craig Warmke, Benjamin Wilson, Lynn Zhang, anonymous referees, and two editors of this journal. Thanks to John Conley and Carlo DaVia for their help translating the epigraph from the Marquise de Sablé. My special thanks go to Shane Wilkins for helpful input on several early drafts and for designing the Tree of Tragic Flaws in LaTeX.

I presented versions of this material to audiences at the University of Arizona, University of California at Irvine, University of California at Riverside, the University of Connecticut's Social Epistemology Working Group, and the New York City Epistemology and Psychology Workshop at Fordham University. I am grateful for questions from audience members.

For generous support during my work on this project, I want to thank the John Templeton Foundation and the University of Connecticut's Humanities Institute.

I learned about Shakespearean tragedy in a high school English class. We were either reading Macbeth or Hamlet—I can't remember which. But I still remember the moment my teacher, Mr. Best, told us about hamartia. I sat there in the classroom, dumbstruck by the certainty that I had some unrecognized flaws. I am grateful to Stephen Best, Rita D'Angelo, Noah Leznoff, David McAdam, and Brenda McLeod.

References

Argyris, Chris. (1976) ‘Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argyris, Chris. (1985) Strategy, Change, and Defensive Routines. Boston, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Argyris, Chris. (2002) ‘Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 206–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. Ross. (1960) Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behaviour. 2d ed. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, Nathan. (2015) ‘The Significance of Unpossessed Evidence’. Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, Nathan. (2019) Knowing Our Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, Nathan. (Forthcoming) ‘A Review of Recent Work on Intellectual Humility: A Philosopher's Perspective’. Journal of Positive Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2021.1940252Google Scholar
Blakemore, Colin, and Cooper, Grahame F.. (1970) ‘Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment’. Nature, 228, 477–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassam, Quassim. (2015) ‘Stealthy Vices’. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 4, 19–25.Google Scholar
Cassam, Quassim. (2019) Vices of the Mind: From the Intellectual to the Political. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, David. (2010) ‘Higher-Order Evidence’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Ian, and Barrett, Justin. (2016) ‘Intellectual Humility’. In Worthington, E. L. Jr., Davis, D. E., and Hook, J. N. (eds.), Handbook of Humility: Theory, Research, and Applications (New York: Routledge), 62–75.Google Scholar
Dalton, John. (1798) ‘Extraordinary Facts relating to the Vision of Colours: With Observations’. Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, 5, 28–45.Google Scholar
Dunning, David, Johnson, Kerri, Ehrlinger, Joyce, and Kruger, Justin. (2003) ‘Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence’. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, Robert. (1965) ‘Hamartia in the Poetics and Aristotle's Model of Failure’. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 4, 658–64.Google Scholar
Elga, Adam. (n.d.) ‘Lucky to be Rational’. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Feldman, Richard. (2005) ‘Respecting the Evidence’. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd. (1991) ‘How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and biases”’. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, and Blanchard, Thomas. (2018) ‘Social Epistemology’. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2018 edition). Accessed September 20, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology-social/Google Scholar
Greco, John. (2012) ‘A (Different) Virtue Epistemology’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85, 1–26.Google Scholar
Haggard, Megan, Rowatt, Wade C., Leman, Joseph C., Meagher, Benjamin, Moore, Courtney, Fergus, Thomas, Whitcomb, Dennis, Battaly, Heather, Baehr, Jason, and Howard-Snyder, Dan. (2018) ‘Finding Middle Ground between Intellectual Arrogance and Intellectual Servility: Development and Assessment of the Limitations-owning Intellectual Humility Scale’. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 184–193.Google Scholar
Hazlett, Allan. (2012) ‘Higher-order Epistemic Attitudes and Intellectual Humility’. Episteme, 9, 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Chip, Larrick, Richard, and Klayman, Joshua. (1998) ‘Cognitive Repairs: How Organizational Practices can Compensate for Individual Shortcomings’. Research in Organization Behavior, 20, 1–37.Google Scholar
Hunt, David M., Dulai, Kanwaljit S., Bowmaker, James K., and Mollon, John D.. (1995) ‘The Chemistry of John Dalton's Color Blindness’. Science, 267, 984–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, Andrew, and O'Riordan, Timothy. (1999) ‘The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Policy and Politics’. In Raffensperger, Carolyn and Tickner, Joel A. (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle (Washington, DC: Island Press), 15–35.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas. (2008) ‘Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization’. Journal of Philosophy, 105, 611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Thomas. (2010) ‘Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence’. In Feldman, Ricchard (ed.), Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press), 111–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Tim. (2014) ‘False Polarization: Debiasing as Applied Social Epistemology’. Synthese, 191, 2529–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Nathan. (2016) ‘Religious Skepticism and Higher-Order Evidence’. In Kvanvig, Jonathan (ed.) Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, vol. 7 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 126–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Justin, and Dunning, David. (1999) ‘Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-assessments’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, Mark R., Diebles, Kate J., Davisson, Erin K., Jongman-Sereno, Katrina P., Isherwood, Jennifer C., Raimi, Kaitlin T., Deffler, Samantha A., and Hoyle, Rick H.. (2017) ‘Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 793–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, Gareth B. (2005) Augustine. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollon, J. D., and Cavonius, L. R.. (2012) ‘The Lagerlunda Collision and the Introduction of Color Vision Testing’. Survey of Ophthalmology, 57, 178–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute, National Eye. (2015) ‘Facts About Color Blindness’. Available at: https://nei.nih.gov/health/color_blindness/facts_about.Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board. (2013) ‘Head-On Collision of Two Union Pacific Railroad Freight Trains Near Goodwell, Oklahoma, June 24, 2012’. Railroad Accident Report NTSB/RAR-13/02, PB2013-107679. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Pronin, Emily. (2007) ‘Perception and Misperception of Bias in Human Judgment’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, Lee, and Nisbett, Richard E.. (1991) The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. London: Pinter and Martin Publishers.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. (2020) ‘The Jerks of Academe’. Chronicle of Higher Education, 31 January 2020. Available at: https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/20200131-the-jerks-of-academe.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Upton. ([1935] 1994) I, Candidate for Governor: And How I Got Licked. Edited by Gregory, James. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sliwa, Paulina, and Horowitz, Sophie. (2015) ‘Respecting All the Evidence’. Philosophical Studies, 172, 2835–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegner, Wallace. (1971) Angle of Repose. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tagg, John. (2007) ‘Double-Loop Learning in Higher Education’. Change, 39, 36–41.Google Scholar
Taleb, Nassim N., and Pilpel, Avital. (2007) ‘Epistemology and Risk Management’. Risk and Regulation, 13, 6–7.Google Scholar
Umpleby, Stuart A. (2009) ‘Ross Ashby's General Theory of Adaptive Systems’. International Journal of General Systems, 38, 231–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara. (2013) ‘“Can” without Possible Worlds: Semantics for Anti-Humeans’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13, 1–27.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . ([1764] 1901) ‘A Philosophical Dictionary, Vol. V—Part II’. In Morley, John and Smollett, Tobias (eds.), Fleming, William F. (trans.), The Works of Voltaire: A Contemporary Version in 21 Vols. (New York: E. R. DuMont).Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1993) ‘Succeeding in Science: Some Rules of Thumb’. Science, 261, 1812–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitcomb, Dennis, Battaly, Heather, Baehr, Jason, and Howard-Snyder, Daniel. (2017) ‘Intellectual Humility: Owning our Limitations’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94, 509–39.Google Scholar
Wu, Kaidi, and Dunning, David. (2017) ‘Hypocognition: Making Sense of the Landscape Beyond One's Conceptual Reach’. Review of General Psychology, 22, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar