Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:40:17.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stance and Being

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2020

JOSEPH ROUSE
JOSEPH ROUSE*
Affiliation:
WESLEYAN [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay builds upon Rebecca Kukla's constructive treatment of Dennettian stances as embodied coping strategies, to extend a conversation previously initiated by John Haugeland about Daniel Dennett on stances and real patterns and Martin Heidegger on the ontological difference. This comparison is mutually illuminating. It advances three underdeveloped issues in Heidegger: Dasein's ‘bodily nature’, the import of Heidegger's ontological pluralism for object identity, and how clarification of the sense of being in general bears on the manifold senses of being. It more sharply differentiates Kukla's and Dennett's understandings of stances and the real. Finally, it allows for further development of Kukla's account of Dennettian stances as embodied. These developments show greater complexity than what Kukla calls ‘the wide and counterfactually flexible repertoire of bodily positions’ that make up an embodied stance. They also show how different stances are compared and assessed even though Kukla rightly denies the possibility of a normative or explanatory philosophical ‘meta-stance’.

Keywords

Intentional stanceembodied cognitionontologyMartin HeideggerQuill Rebecca Kukla
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2021 , pp. 20 - 39
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to Quill R. Kukla, participants in the 2019 meeting of the International Society for Phenomenological Studies, the audience at the University of California at Santa Cruz, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions.

References

Cerbone, David. (2013) ‘Heidegger on Space and Spatiality’. In Wrathall, Mark (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger's Being and Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. (1991a) Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. (1991b) ‘Real Patterns’. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. (2013) ‘Kinds of Things: Toward a Bestiary of the Manifest Image’. In Ross, Don, Ladyman, James, and Kincaid, Harold (eds.), Scientific Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. (2018) ‘Reflections on Rebecca Kukla’. In Huebner, Bryce (ed.), The Philosophy of Daniel Dennett (New York: Routledge), 32–35.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. (1993) ‘Pattern and Being’. In Dahlbom, Bo (ed.), Dennett and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell), 53–69.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. (2013) Dasein Disclosed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1927) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1962) Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1979) Prolegomenon zur Geschichte des Zeitsbegriff. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klosterman.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1982) The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. (1985) History of the Concept of Time. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2002) ‘Ontology and Temporality of Conscience’. Continental Philosophy Review, 35, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2017) ‘Ostension and Assertion’. In Adams, Zed and Browning, Jacob (eds.), Giving a Damn (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 103–30.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2018) ‘Embodied Stances: Realism without Literalism’. In Huebner, Bryce (ed.), The Philosophy of Daniel Dennett (New York: Routledge), 3–31.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca, and Lance, Mark. (2009) Yo! And Lo! Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca, and Winsberg, Eric. (2015) ‘Deflationism, Pragmatism, and Metaphysics’. In Gross, Stephen, Tebben, Nicholas, and Williams, Michael (eds.), Meaning without Representation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. (1981) After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Okrent, Mark. (2007) Rational Animals. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Okrent, Mark. (2018) Nature and Normativity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. (2004) Gut Reactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Don. (2000) ‘Rainforest Realism’. In Ross, Don and Brook, Andrew (eds.), Dennett's Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. (2003) Heidegger Naturalized, and Vice Versa. Unpublished talk, International Society for Phenomenological Studies, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. (2015) Articulating the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. (2019) ‘World-Disclosing Animals’. In Burch, Matthew, Marsh, James, and McMullin, Irene (eds.), Normativity, Meaning and the Promise of Phenomenology (New York: Routledge), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. (manuscript) ‘Social Practices as Biological Niche Construction’. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1×7MT9rdqdmcTfUzMLKRXHvVt6RBSBtdg/view.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. (2016) Death and the Afterlife. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. (2010) Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar