Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2022
Motivating reforms to address discrimination and exclusion is important. But what epistemic practices characterize better or worse ways of doing this? Recently, the phenomena of implicit biases have played a large role in motivating reforms. We argue that this strategy risks perpetuating two kinds of epistemic oppression: the vindication dynamic and contributory injustice. We offer positive proposals for avoiding these forms of epistemic oppression when confronting racism.
We thank audiences at the Bias in Context Workshop at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; the University of Sheffield; the University of Edinburgh; and the University of Southampton for feedback on earlier versions of this paper as well as anonymous reviewers for comments that have enabled the paper to evolve significantly since it was first submitted.