Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:48:53.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implicit Bias and Epistemic Oppression in Confronting Racism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2022

JULES HOLROYD
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD [email protected]
KATHERINE PUDDIFOOT
Affiliation:
DURHAM UNIVERSITY [email protected]

Abstract

Motivating reforms to address discrimination and exclusion is important. But what epistemic practices characterize better or worse ways of doing this? Recently, the phenomena of implicit biases have played a large role in motivating reforms. We argue that this strategy risks perpetuating two kinds of epistemic oppression: the vindication dynamic and contributory injustice. We offer positive proposals for avoiding these forms of epistemic oppression when confronting racism.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank audiences at the Bias in Context Workshop at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; the University of Sheffield; the University of Edinburgh; and the University of Southampton for feedback on earlier versions of this paper as well as anonymous reviewers for comments that have enabled the paper to evolve significantly since it was first submitted.

References

American Philosophical Association Good Practices Guide. (n.d.) Accessed October 28, 2020. https://www.apaonline.org/page/goodpracticesguide.Google Scholar
Amodio, David M., and Devine, Patricia G.. (2006) ‘Stereotyping and Evaluation in Implicit Race Bias: Evidence for Independent Constructs and Unique Effects on Behavior’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Elizabeth. (2007) ‘Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective’. Ethics, 117, 595622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Saray. (2016) ‘Speech Affordances: A Structural Take on How Much We Can Do with Our Words’. European Journal of Philosophy, 24, 879–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Saray, and Vasilyeva, Nadya. (2015) ‘Explaining Injustice in Speech: Individualistic vs. Structural Explanation’. In R. Dale, C. Jennings, P. P. Maglio, T. Matlock, D. C. Noelle, A. Warlaumount, and J. Yoshimi (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 130–35.Google Scholar
Berenstain, Nora. (2016) ‘Epistemic Exploitation’. Ergo, 3, 569–90.Google Scholar
Bhopal, Kalwant, and Jackson, June. (2013) ‘The Experiences of Black and Minority Ethnic Academics: Multiple Identities and Career Progression’. University of Southampton EPSRC Report.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. (2002) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Lacey J. (2019) ‘When Testimony Isn't Enough: Implicit Bias Research as Epistemic Exclusion’. In Sherman, Benjamin and Goguen, Stacy (eds.), Overcoming Epistemic Injustice (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 269–84.Google Scholar
Davis, Emmalon. (2016) ‘Typecasts, Tokens, and Spokespersons: A Case for Credibility Excess as Testimonial Injustice’. Hypatia, 31, 485501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Emmalon. (2018) ‘On Epistemic Appropriation’. Ethics, 128, 702–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Patricia G., Forscher, Patrick S., Austin, Anthony J., and Cox, William T. L.. (2012) ‘Long-term Reduction in Implicit Race Bias: A Prejudice Habit-breaking Intervention’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, Michael. (2018) ‘Resisting Structural Epistemic Injustice’. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 4, Article 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. (2011) ‘Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing’. Hypatia, 26, 236–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. (2012) ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression’. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 33, 2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. (2018) ‘On Intellectual Diversity and Differences that May not Make a Difference’. Ethics and Education, 13, 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie, and Gilbert, Marita. (2014) ‘Curious Disappearances: Affectability Imbalances and Process-Based Invisibility’. Hypatia, 29, 873–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, John F., and Gaertner, Samuel L.. (2000) ‘Aversive Racism and Selection Decisions: 1989 and 1999’. Psychological Science, 11, 315–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddo-Lodge, Reni. (2017) Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People about Race. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon-Reed, Annette, and Takagi, M.. (1997) Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy. University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Green, Alexander R., Carney, Dana R., Pallin, Daniel J., Ngo, Long H., Raymond, Kristal L., Iezzoni, Lisa I., and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. (2007) ‘Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients’. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1231–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslanger, Sally. (2015) ‘Distinguished Lecture: Social Structure, Narrative and Explanation’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, J., and Saul, J.. (2018) ‘Implicit Bias and Reform Efforts in Philosophy’. Philosophical Topics, 46, 71102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, Jules, Scaife, Robin, and Stafford, Tom. (2017) ‘What is Implicit Bias?’. Philosophy Compass, 12, 1-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurston, Zora Neale. (1950) ‘What White Publishers Won't Print’. Negro Digest, 8, 8589.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Rudman, Laurie A., Blair, Irene V., Carney, Dana R., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Glaser, Jack, and Hardin, Curtis D.. (2009) ‘The Existence of Implicit Bias is beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Refutation of Ideological and Methodological Objections and Executive Summary of Ten Studies that no Manager should Ignore’. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 3969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre. (1990) ‘Foreword’. In Braxton, Joanne and McLaughlin, Andree (eds.), Wild Women in the Whirlwind: Afra-American Culture and the Contemporary Literary Renaissance (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), xixv.Google Scholar
Madva, Alex. (2016) ‘A Plea for Anti-Anti-Individualism: How Oversimple Psychology Misleads Social Policy’. Ergo, 3, 27.Google Scholar
McConnell, Allen R., and Leibold, Jill M.. (2001) ‘Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, José. (2013) The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2007) ‘White Ignorance’. In Sullivan, Shannon and Tuana, Nancy (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance (SUNY Press), 1338.Google Scholar
National Centre for Education Statistics. (2020) Accessed March 23, 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61.Google Scholar
Oswald, Frederick L., Mitchell, Gregory, Blanton, Hart, Jaccard, James, and Tetlock, Philip E.. (2013) ‘Predicting Ethnic and Racial Discrimination: A Meta-analysis of IAT Criterion Studies’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilkington, Andrew. (2013) ‘The Interacting Dynamics of Institutional Racism in Higher Education’. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 16, 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankine, Claudia. (2014) Citizen: An American Lyric. Graywolf Press.Google Scholar
Rollock, Nicola. (2019) ‘Staying Power: The Career Experiences and Strategies of UK Black Female Professors’. https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/10075/Staying-Power/pdf/UCU_Rollock_February_2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine. (2016) ‘Hermeneutical Injustice: Blood-sports and the English Defence League’. Social Epistemology, 30, 592610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. (2013) ‘Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy’. In Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona (eds.), Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? (Oxford University Press), 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. (2018) ‘(How) Should we Tell Implicit Bias Stories?’. Disputatio, 10, 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shilliam, Robbie. (2015) ‘Black Academia: The Door is Open but the Architecture Remains the Same’. In Claire Alexander and Jason Arday (eds.), Aiming Higher (Runnymede Perspectives), 3234.Google Scholar
Sharma, Meera. (2014) ‘Claudia Rankine on Blackness as the Second Person’. Nov 17, Guernica Magazine. Accessed October 20, 2020. https://www.guernicamag.com/blackness-as-the-second-person/.Google Scholar
Singal, Jesse. (2017) ‘Psychology's Favourite Tool for Measuring Racism Isn't Up To The Job’. The Cut. Accessed July 18, 2018. https://www.thecut.com/2017/01/psychologys-racism-measuring-tool-isnt-up-to-the-job.html.Google Scholar
Sue, Derald Wing, Capodilupo, Christina M., and Holder, Aisha. (2008) ‘Racial microaggressions in the life experience of Black Americans’. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Táíwò, Olúfémi O. (2020) ‘Being-in-the-Room Privilege: Elite Capture and Epistemic Deference’. The Philosopher, 108, (“What is We?”). https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/essay-taiwo.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. (1992) ‘Moral Deference’. Philosophical Forum, 24, 233–50.Google Scholar
Wanzo, Rebecca. (2009). The Suffering will not be Televised: African American Women and Sentimental Political Storytelling. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Fannie Barrier. (1905) ‘The Colored Girl’. The Voice of the Negro, 2, 400403.Google Scholar
Yamato, Gloria. (2004) ‘Something about the Subject Makes it Hard to Name’. In Anderson, Margaret and Collins, Patricia Hill (eds.), Race, Class and Gender, 5th ed. (New York: Thomson/Wadsworth), 99103.Google Scholar